A Few More Thoughts About Change

After giving the matter careful thought and consideration, I believe that I might end up converting to the ingenious idea forwarded by the almighty BHO/JFK that this election is all about “change.” I know that I have humorously pointed out on a few occasions that the only “change” the left is truly concerned with is what they ask me for in front of the grocery store or the mall. Well, I have seen the error of my ways and I am now open to the concept of “change” and I am thinking about swallowing the Socialist Eucharist at the next Obama tent revival that manages to make its way through my town.

I was wondering though, being that I wish to be a part of the “big tent of inclusion and fairness”, if I could make a few suggestions relative to all of this “change” business. That is if my opinion actually matters, like you liberal folks like to let on that it does whenever the flash bulbs are popping and while the microphones and the scribblers are in sight. I was hoping that my newfound candidate who espouses “change” would be open to some of my suggested “changes”. Here we go..

Is there any chance that you could “change” the Democratic Party’s addiction to the plague of liberalism? I know that this is a big one but I figured that if you would consider making that important “change” up front, a lot of the following “changes” would more or less happen as a matter of political osmosis. Just in case that this initial request appears to be too much to ask for, I will go through a few more of the individual “changes” that I feel are important to me. These are my “feelings” now and I know how important a person’s “feelings” are to the left..

What is the chance that you could “change” the Democrats obvious enthusiasm for destroying the public school system? Is the ruination of the public schools one of the Democratic Parties goals because that appears to be the case based upon the Democrats previous history of actions and inactions. Since the liberals abhor the concept of “outcome based education” (grades) among other things, why do you reflexively blame the public school’s constant failures upon a “lack of funding”? On a related note, if the teachers in the public school system can’t figure out how to teach second graders how to do simple addition how is it that they are then sufficiently capable to instruct those same children in sex education? And as well, why do you allow imbecile instigators to forward the destructive fiction that 2+2=racist?

Is there any possibility that you could “change” the Democrats predilection and adoration of the ACLU? In case you have been a little too busy to notice, the ACLU spends all of their time trying to destroy those who defend America and defending those who are trying to destroy America.

Could you possibly “change” the liberal allergy to the Constitutional “freedom of religion”? I had always thought that freedom OF religion also meant freedom FROM religion as well, that this was an individual’s “choice”. I thought this “choice” thing was what the left was all about?

Speaking of “choice”, what is the chance that you could “change” the liberal inclination towards murdering the unborn? I know that most of you look good sporting your rubber aprons and your monogrammed ice tongs, but possibly, if the fifty million abortions you’ve “provided” had actually been brought to term, you wouldn’t have to encourage the millions of illegal aliens who violate our borders in order to “do the jobs no one else will do”.. This “liberal Dr. Mengele wanna-be infanticide infatuation” has got to go..

Is there any probability that we could “change” the left’s preference towards the blatant discrimination that is carefully couched within the sledgehammer semantics of “quotas and set asides”? It is hard to envision a “level playing field” when everyone is not allowed to participate based upon his or her achievements and his or her pigmentation and plumbing mysteriously takes precedence over an individual’s accomplishments.

Could we “change” the Democratic Party’s dependence upon exorbitant taxation? I have heard that you guys are big on handing out free needles and that you get all weepy about “intervention” and “rehabilitation” so couldn’t we create a Methadone clinic dedicated to the left and its need for its habitual “tax fixes” and “injections”? I suppose that with that startling realization the liberals might understand that their ponderous version of government does not create jobs, it systematically oppresses those who do.

Is there any chance that you could stop worshiping the likes of Al $harpton , Je$$e Jack$on, Al Gore, Harry Reid, Nancy “Where’s my 747″ Pelosi and Dhimmi Carter for a “change”? All of the heady references to FDR, JFK and others in the Democratic pantheon fall short of being genuinely convincing when you are sharing a podium with these trolls. What happened to the “Zell Miller Democrats”? I swear that I saw an example of one stuffed and mounted at the Smithsonian Institution categorized as a “Democratic conservative, placed upon the United States endangered species list in 1966. Totally extinct shortly thereafter”..

Could we begin to “change” the liberal perpetual enslavement of the lowest class through the ball and chain of welfare? I know that you have made great strides towards ending the curse of “poverty” ever since the inception of the “Great Society” and if just given a little more time and a few trillion more tax dollars feloniously stolen form the working class, that you would cure this malignant malaise. But if that plan which hasn’t seemed to address and alleviate this problem for over forty years doesn’t pan out during your time in office, is there any way could we get a “timetable” and an “exit plan” relative to this useless “War on Poverty”?

I know that this is just a partial list and if given more time, I could have been more thorough but I didn’t want to “tax” my Democratic friends too much. (See. I am a bad Democrat already, I am trying to cut taxes..) If you get around to these kinds of real and tangible “changes”, you will gain more converts than you can possibly win with your hollow and unsubstantial promises and the vacuity and vapidity of your meaningless calls for the illusory and translucent phantasms of “hope and change.”