BHO/JFK is just about to wing his way off to Europe so that his beatification on that continent can proceed as planned. Children generally get a bit antsy on long plane trips, so I hope that his chaperones will bring plenty of coloring books and hard candy to keep the tyke amused. But before he goes, I found a story on the wire, “Obama steers clear of Michigan Muslims he may need to win state”, that has a need for further scrutiny.
I hear that statistically, Michigan has the distinct pleasure of being the most ‘Muslim state in America.’ All that means to me is that anyone looking for a Slurpee or wanting a cab anywhere in Michigan probably does not have that long of a wait. That bellicose bunch generates four percent of the votes cast in Michigan. The concern, (it is impossible to talk about the left or any of their marionettes without there being a “concern” or two to weep over..) according to the story, is that Senator Obama has not “visited a mosque or met with Muslim leaders.” Here is a news flash for all of the hirsute members of the “Mosque of the Ticking Turban” in Dearbornistan. I am here to tell you that you do not need to rush over and pull down or cover up the “Magnificent nineteen” posters that you bow before, because BHO/JFK is in “persuade/fool the undecideds” mode. I don’t think that he would possibly consider stopping by to use the restroom, even if you had one available, anytime soon..
“Inside Michigan Politics” says Obama has to “strike a delicate balance”, which translates to “again keep persuading/fooling the undecideds at all costs”. They claim that Obama “doesn’t have to pander” (that shows how little Inside Michigan Politics knows about politics in general..) to those “who are likely to back him anyway”, though he can not afford to, “dismiss them in an arrogant fashion…” (that shows how little they also know about liberal Democratic politics in particular..)
The story said that it would be a mistake for him not to court Michigan’s Muslims because they “went for Kerry four years ago and George Bush in 2000.” Two points. 1) In order for the Senator to “court” a group of potential voters, it will be necessary for him to actually address an issue or two. That is a political risk that the inexperienced little fella has yet to undertake. 2) The “American” Muslims went for Bush in 2000 because even the Muslims couldn’t bring themselves to vote for a doofus like Al Gore..
Osama Siblani of the “Arab American News” located in Dearborn (surprise!!) says that Obama must view “Muslims as (a) liability..” Since Obama won’t address this issue, or any other for that matter, as a public service, allow me to do so on his or any other candidate’s behalf. What makes the Muslims a “liability” is the inability for any of you to stand up and formally denounce some of your fellow rugmates who have adopted the propensity for spontaneously exploding when there are a large number of innocent non believers around. No matter how many Korans are fictitiously flushed or how many nude pyramids are assembled by rootin’ tootin’ Army she men, no one disgraces your religion more than the Islamic terrorists who pervert the words of the Koran while claiming to be following your deities orders. Period.
Further the story reports that “only 8 percent of Muslims identify themselves as Republican, compared with 49 percent who say that they are Democrats.” A few points, if I may.. 1) With the immigration system as screwed up as it is, I’d be happy if 100 percent of the Muslims taking up space here, really are who they “claim” that they are, regardless of their alleged political affiliation. 2) I am nothing even remotely resembling a mathematical wizard, but I believe that those numbers add up to 57 percent. What do the other 43 percent claim that they are, politically speaking? Independents? Green Party-ers? Just a second, given Obama’s well documented inexperience, doesn’t he seem to be the clear and logical choice for the “Green” party too? 3) Only 49 percent? The liberals haven’t concentrated enough on taking their “you are an oppressed and targeted victim in the Evil States of America” road show and sing song to the nations Muslims, or else that number would probably be somewhere in the neighborhood of 90 to 95 percent..
Those “statistics” were supplied by the CAIR who also claim that in 2006, those numbers were 17% Republican and 42% Democratic. That proves that the Muslims were pretty quick on the uptake. In a relatively short amount of time, they have properly deduced through careful observation, that the Democrats have virtually the same anti American agenda as the Middle Eastern Islamofascist puppet masters that send the CAIR their marching orders. They’re just listening to the Democrats now in order to save on the long distance bills..
The closest Obama came to “dispelling” or addressing this “Muslim” issue came during an interview with Larry King. BHO/JFK criticized the recent New Yorker magazine cover, calling it an “insult to Muslim Americans.” Fact check: there were only two “Americans” portrayed on the New Yorker cover. The only other “person” portrayed was Bin Laden, who was in a portrait above the fireplace. How could the cover be an insult to Muslims when there were no Muslims (other than Bin Laden) on the cover, nor were there any references to them either? Is he saying that he and his wife are “Muslim Americans”? (For all of you JFK fans and since BHO is being touted as the Second Coming, how about ‘Ich bin ein Muslim American’?) The American flag burning in the fireplace didn’t bother Obama as he has probably been told that the burning of American flags is also a Democratic aphrodisiac. His allergy to specifics justifiably fuels the fires of innuendo and speculation.
Silbani squawked on, saying that Obama is not going to get “the overwhelming support of our community.” Silbani needs to understand that that is not an overriding concern for the Democrats right now. The lefties won’t publicly share their personal fantasy of camels grazing on the lawn of the White House, and how high a priority it is for them, until after they steal the reigns of power through their “centrist deception”.
If this whole “voting thing” is so important to Silbani, how come he isn’t working harder to bring “freedom” and the “right to vote” to those who remain imprisoned within the cesspool that is the Middle East?
Hassan Habhab said he “supported Obama until the incident” involving the two women who were ejected from the photo op for wearing hijabs. As another public service, I would like to clear this “hijab controversy” up once and for all.
Here is what actually took place during all of the chaos and noise that surrounded the anointed ones visit to Detroit. An enthusiastic Obama staffer asked another who the two women were. The other staffer said that they didn’t know but they pointed out that “the women had hijabs.” The first staffer thought that the second had said that “the women had JOBS.” The appearance of two “employed” Democrats in the picture would have completely skewed the Democratic demographics therefore the women were quickly rushed from the stage. Their removal had nothing to do with their headgear, it had everything to do with the transparently false imagery and fiction of “employed Democrats”, and the staffers knew that they would be called onto the carpet over the ruse. I hope this brings this controversy into better focus and finally puts it to rest…
Ron Amen, an Obama volunteer said that there is an “Islamophobic wave” in America. Amen to that Ron, and we hope that that wave’s undertow will take the Democrats and their dystrophic dinghy of “hope and change” right to the bottom of the political sea.