Today, “writers” (the term here is used loosely) for the Associated Press (please take note of the first three letters of the word Associated..) are reflexively reinforcing what was summarily covered in “The Pot Calling the Kettle” back in June of this year. If I may summarize, the only possible reason that Barack Hussein Obama can lose the upcoming election is due to the “white racial prejudice” that is rampant in America. Just to keep things “fair”, the story and the “poll” (a mere 2,227 people..) included professed Democrats as well as the requisite and obviously racist Republicans as well.. Brace yourselves, you are all racists.
The story, “Poll: Racial misgivings of whites an Obama issue” is a cornucopia of gibberish that differs only slightly from the “they’re going to scare you about me” tripe that Obama himself has been laughingly advancing since the beginning of his sham-paign.
These “racial misgivings” are “deep seated” as well. According to the AP-Yahoo News poll (Sounds to me like they managed to find 2,227 yahoos who were then included..) “One third of white Democrats harbor negative views towards blacks”. A few points if I may..
The only “negative views” of consequence would be those relative to Barack Hussein Obama. The “generalizations” of some random “poll” about “blacks in general” are completely irrelevant. These Democrats or Republicans for that matter, aren’t calling Barack Obama “violent”, “complaining”, “lazy” and irresponsible”. The inference is that if you aren’t going to vote for Obama, the reason has to be that you are a racist. You are not allowed to disagree with his policies, (whatever they are..) you are not allowed to disagree with his take on the issues. (whatever they are..) If you aren’t going to vote for him, you are a racist, get it?
This ridiculous fairy tale (Thanks to Bill Clinton for that one.) goes askance right from the starting blocks “One-third of white Democrats harbor negative views towards blacks.” If that were actually true, wouldn’t Hillary Clinton have been the nominee of the Democratic Party? Maybe Dennis Kucinich could have gotten the nomination had not the Democratic voters harbored a negative view towards crackpots. Is it possible for the transparency of this “story” to be any more self-evident?
The story (which surprisingly didn’t humorously call this hokum an “epidemic” or “a crisis” as so many others before it have) says that, “40 percent of all white Americans hold at least a partly negative view towards blacks.” Mind you, this is based upon the “Yahoo” poll of yahoos done on line and by computer, of 2,227 people. Again, their inferred liberal syllogism falls short: 40 percent of “all white Americans” (“all”: fallacy of evidence) hold a negative view of blacks. (In this case we are only talking about 40 percent of the 2,227 people polled.) Obama is black. (Another fallacy of evidence. 50 percent, actually.) Ergo, 40 percent of all white Americans hold a negative view of Obama.
Utilizing this typically empty and vapid liberal logic, let’s try another Socialist “silly-gism”. 95 percent of all blacks support Obama. John McCain is white. Therefore, 95 percent of all blacks have a “negative view” of whites.. 95 percent is a vastly larger sum than 40 percent, isn’t it? Where are the cries of “black racism”? There are none because black Americans are entitled to support the candidate of their choice without all of the baseless charges others in this country are “subjected to” (AKA: harassed) in order to help them towards “changing their mind.” The blacks have already made “the right choice, which ain’t the white choice” and it’s only the racist whites of America that “need convincing”..
The liberal authors of this “piece”, who are trying so very hard to disguise their puppy love for Obama, also called Obama’s nomination a “seminal moment for a nation that enshrined slavery in its Constitution.” As Ronald Reagan said, “There you go again..” This farfetched Constitutional “stretch” tacitly involves the following: Section 9 of Article I, Section 2 of Article IV, Section 2 of Article I and Article V. I saved them the trouble of actually “researching” their flaccid, hollow and baseless statements. None of those four could even be remotely construed as “enshrined”, but when you have a liberal agenda to support, proof is irrelevant. It is nothing more than the liberal axiom, “I believe it, therefore it is so.” I supposed that Whoppi Goldberg helped vet this article for the AP..
The article again says, “Just seven in 10 people who call themselves democrats support Obama..” As well as, “The survey also focused on the racial attitudes..” Again, remember that this was a survey of 2,227 people. This article even called this survey “exhaustive.” 2,227 people.. Not much was said about “policies”. Not much was said about “the issues”. It’s all about the inherent racism of those who have the audacity to vote against the “143 Day Wonder” and his senseless sidekick Joe Lieden.
The groundless assumptions within this article are almost too much to bear. “Obama’s support would be as much as 6 percentage points higher if there were no white racial prejudice.” Brace yourself, there will be a lot more where that came from.. How much higher would McCain’s support be if there were no black racial prejudice? Or are we to assume, as the liberals have, that the concept of “black racial prejudice” is non existent?
“Nearly 17 percent of Clinton’s white backers plan to vote for McCain..” This apostasy can be quickly and efficiently renamed, “White backers equals red necks.” How many of that 17 percent were females? Females who have the right to be upset at the manhandling/disrespect showed to their candidate by the Democratic elitists? It is just too easy to re-categorize the Clinton supporter’s justifiable “feelings” into the imaginary pre election excuse of “white racism”.
I am sure that this will not be my last word on this topic simply because this will not be THEIR last word on the topic. Wait until the Obama yard signs start getting bogusly burned or destroyed as election day grows near..
The liberals are of the opinion that those of us who do not swoon over Germany’s favorite candidate are busy pressing our white sheets and building wooden crosses for some unfortunate’s front yard. The reality is that they are the ones busy pressing their brown shirts and polishing their jackboots.
Brace yourselves, unless you have an Obama sticker on your Prius or an Obama sign stuck in the compost heap in your front yard, you will be considered a de facto racist.