The liberals insist in over involving themselves in anything and everything. Acknowledging that the “liberal definitional inversion” is deeply embedded within each their moronic mantras is of paramount importance in order to dissect their demagoguery with surgical precision. For example, the “equality of opportunity” in their dirty hands morphs into the “equality of outcome”. Since the left demands an “equality of outcome” as opposed to an “equality of opportunity”, they have to immerse themselves to an illogical degree in the “day to day operations” of everything that they “selflessly” impose themselves upon. Combining their nonsensical nomenclature with the instinctively intrusive idea of “government”, unfortunately creates the progressive “perfect storm”..
Up until quite recently, the liberal “over involvement” has been manifestly apparent when it comes to the “environment”. The liberals will never realize that their “concern” more often than not, actually retards the environment, which if left to its own devices, is a self-sustaining entity. As an example, one group of liberals will bellow for windmills as an “alternative energy source” and another group of liberals will sue the previous group of liberals because their windmills will “kill too many birds”.. Liberals apparently don’t even trust each other to protect the Earth..
That’s right, in July of 2005, the “Center For Biological Diversity” filed suit against the wind farm operators of Altamount Pass “to reduce bird deaths” related to their production of “clean, renewable energy”.. The “Center” only requested six and a half million dollars to preserve bird habitats in the area from the dangerous Altamont Pass liberals..
The liberal embittered enviro-eccentrics have an innate propensity for being embarrassingly wrong but they have never been taken to task for it. In a number of cases, they have actually been rewarded and bestowed accolades for their intellectual ineptitude.
In the April 1975 edition of Newsweek magazine, Peter Gwynne contributed an article entitled “The Cooling World”. The prevailing winds back then, hopefully not provided by the aforementioned “murderous windmills”, contained the bleating of “scientists” convinced that the “New Ice Age” was upon us..
Dr. Paul Ehrlich, Stanford biologist and “author” of “The Population Bomb”, (located in the “infantile fiction” section of your local used book store..) in the late 1960’s (the epicenter of imbecilic “thought”) made a name for himself by not only predicting “mass famines in the United States in the 1970’s and the 1980’s..” but also claiming that “hundreds of millions will die in smog disasters in New York and Los Angeles”.. Not to be outdone by the sonority his own stupidity, he further postulated that “U.S. life expectancy will drop to 42 years by 1980 due to cancer epidemics..”
The “name that he made for himself” was “laughingstock”.. We certainly expect nattering nincompoops like Al Gore to embrace such hilarious hysteria for the profit, but tenured “scientists” like Ehrlich who are obviously overwhelmed by the undertow of their insipid liberalism should be euthanized for the sake of humanity..
So that they may properly propagate, the left must manufacture exorbitant amounts of hysteria, catastrophe and alarm. One of the “global cooling” gurus who conveniently became one of the “global warming” goons, Stephen Schneider, actually said, “to capture the public imagination, we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified dramatic statements and little mention of any doubts one might have. Each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective and being honest”..
Understanding this inherent imbalance of intellectualization leads us from the environment to the “financial crisis”, the “economic stimulus plan” and the Obama/Pelosi caliphate..
The “environment” now becomes the “free market” and again, if left to its own devices and if the moronic meddlers of the left would cease with their communism, the free market would take care of itself. When working with, not against, the free market, the government should relinquish responsibilities, not reinforce them.
There is nothing “new” relative to anything that the liberals do. This Obama “plan” is beginning to stink more and more like the “New Deal” each and every day. Years after the Roosevelt mystique has worn off, economists are concluding that the policies of the New Deal actually prolonged the Great Depression. The “economic stimulus package”, based upon the same utopian collectivist governmental intrusion as the New Deal will have the same exasperating effect upon us and the economy.
UCLA economists Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian have studied the New Deal intensely for over four years and they have concluded that the Democratic impertinence added years of unnecessary suffering to the Great Depression. The “Depression” then became “Great” under the totalitarian tutelage of the Democrats. That is not only Obama-esque “change”, it is another pristine example of “progress, progressive style” and “we ain’t seen nothin’ yet”..
In 2004, Ohanian said that, relative to the Great Depression, “a relapse isn’t (wasn’t) likely unless lawmakers gum up a recovery with ill-conceived stimulus policies.” This proves that the “rush” demanded by Pelosi and Obama, a “rush” that didn’t allow for economists to properly “vet” this bill, will bring about another Great Depression because “lawmakers (will) gum up a recovery with ill-conceived stimulus policies.” That isn’t even taking into account the multiple billions in “ill-conceived policies” that have nothing at all to do with the economy that have been “liberally” (criminally) interlarded into this “bill”..
Cole said that, “He (Roosevelt) came up with a recovery package that would be unimaginable today, allowing businesses in every industry to collude and (for) workers to demand salaries about 25 percent above where they ought to have been..” That seems to prove that occasionally, economists aren’t always the best prognosticators of the progressive political pogroms, circa 2009 because yesterday’s “unimaginable” is here today.. Here the collusion involves the lack of “accountability” and the liberal enabling and subsequent rewarding of the sub prime scandal and all of its parasitical participants.
Cole said, “The fact that the Depression dragged on for years convinced generations of economists and policy makers that capitalism could not be trusted to recover from depressions..” The only “economists and policy makers” who would not trust capitalism were and are the Marxist ones who perennially voted and vote “liberal”. “Depressions” of their own making were just their “convenient excuse” or the “inconvenient truth” for them to come out of the collectivist closet, so to speak..
Cole continued on, “..and that significant government intervention was required to achieve good outcomes..” “Good” for whom, I would ask.. Here the economists become perfect prognosticators as the liberals truly and childishly believe that their oppressive oligarchy, which can easily be termed “significant government intervention”, will achieve “good outcomes” when history has proven that their carcinogenic contact with capitalism invariably begets communism. This “bill” will prove to be no different.
If the liberals could keep their hands off of the free market and capitalism, (“Keep your laws off my life savings”, if I may paraphrase the disgusting liberal abortion mongers..) this “Depression”, which they themselves have cultivated, would pass much quicker because the free market, “free” in this case of liberals, is a self sustaining entity.
1995 Nobel Laureate in economics Robert E. Lucas Jr., in 2004 said, “The prevention and cure of depressions is a central mission of macroeconomics, and if we can’t understand what happened in the 1930’s, how can we be sure it won’t happen again?” The only way that “we can make sure it won’t happen again” is to place the liberal genus on the “political endangered species list” because it is the “central mission” of the progressive pathos to facilitate and ferment “depressions” of any and all kinds. The “Greater”, the better..