The word is that BHO/JFK/LBJ is “troubled” about his “massive spending bill”. He is nowhere near as “troubled” as the rest of us justifiably are. Obama wants to knock off Smithfield Foods, Incorporated of Virginia as the largest pork producer in the United States.. “Mission Accomplished”, Commander in Thief..
The blowsy and vacuous campaign promises of the progressive poltroon have all but disappeared, now replaced by the “historic” nature of his election. Just because a slim majority bought into the last vestige of the “Affirmative Action” ruse, doesn’t mean that his failures and his inherent liberal destructiveness aren’t available for dissection and discussion. With the left it is always folderol over fact, sophistry over substance.. Especially when the frivolous wasting of the middle class’s hard earned tax revenues are in the balance.
In an article entitled, “Obama to Sign Spending Bill, Push for Earmark Reforms”, we learn that the Obama spend-a-thon “is stashed with the very kinds of pet projects that the campaigning Obama promised to resist.” It’s only $410 billion in “spending”, so why all of the hubbub, bub?
The bill is to be signed even though Obama is “troubled” about the earmarks that “Republicans and moderate Democrats have eviscerated as unworthy pork barrel spending.” Obama isn’t “troubled” enough about the 7,991 earmarks totaling 5.5 billion dollars to demand that they be removed from the bill, that would be considered “responsible” during a time of economic troubles.. Obama is “planning” on working on the “earmark” problem AFTER he gets this bill signed. We must “move forward”. Remember that it is all about “motion” with the lefties. “Direction” is irrelevant.
The liberals take one giant leap backwards, which is followed by two tiny steps “forward”, which leaves you at least eight steps farther back from where you began and this is “moving forward” for the lachrymose liberals. If they are called out by anyone on the “eight steps back”, then it is the fault of the “economy that they inherited” (from themselves).. It’s the “collectivist conundrum” for those who fail to see the progressive pattern.
Obama lackeys have “been dismissing criticism of the earmarks in the bill saying the legislation was a remnant of last year.” Obama will “turn his attention to future spending instead of looking backward..” See, I told you.. A “remnant” of last year? It is actually a remnant of “The New Steal”. It is a remnant of every liberal redistribution rook and racket that they have ever perpetrated.
“Aides say that the administration would move to introduce new “rules of the road” that could allow Obama greater sway over lawmakers, particularly on politically embarrassing spending that generated mockery from pundits and rival politicians..” That sounds to me like a “line item veto” for Obama, or the “Liberal Longshanks”. “Greater sway”? For someone who is allegedly “so popular”, couldn’t he just wave his magic wand and spread his fairy dust so that everyone would prostrate themselves before him and cooperate? Demagogue AND dictator..
Obama’s budget plan calls for a $1.8 trillion dollar deficit. Pray tell, what happened to all of the liberal sob sister soliloquies of days past where the “deficit” was as frightening to the inherently incontinent liberals as global warming, the population explosion and the impending ice age? Suddenly the “we will just print more” Marxists have bigger and smellier fish to fry than the deficit..
Whatever you do, do not do as the liberals of yesteryear used to advise, “Question authority.” When the liberals are in charge, “authority” is a good thing so no one needs to be disputatious or argumentative. What happened to the 2003 Rodham railings at the Jefferson Jackson Bailey dinner in Connecticut? “I am sick and tired of people who say that if we debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you are not patriotic.. (You aren’t, your idea of being “patriotic” is paying more taxes, right, Joe?) “We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration..” Where did harpy Hillary’s enthusiasm for “debate” go after January of 2009?
This “massive spending bill to keep the federal government running contains significant increases in food aid for the poor, energy research and other programs”. “A 14 percent boost for a popular program that feeds infants and poor women (who do little else except create more of the afore mentioned infants/enslaved future liberals..) and a 10 percent increase in housing vouchers for the poor..” THIS is the kind of government that the liberals create and this is the kind of government that NEEDS to be shut down..
This new “super hero”, our new “man of action” is chiefly concerned with his image in the history books yet to be written by those who idolize him, not with the waste within his “pasta against the wall” inspired alleged “stimulus packages” and “spending” bills.
Obama is quite fond of “talking”. He “talks” to the Syrians, the Palestinians, the Iranians and any other Middle Eastern malcontents and soiled savages. The excuse always used by the liberals is that the “earmarks” are the concessions needed to secure the passage of their bloated bill. IF Obama was concerned with “efficiently” addressing the problem created by his contemporaries from the nineties, he would TALK directly to THE PEOPLE with his demand that the Demokratic congress do what is best for the nation. The only time that the will of THE PEOPLE is of any concern to a liberal is during the “election process”. After the election, the roar of the constituents becomes a whisper and the whispers of the lobbyists become a roar..
What we are left with is the socialists trying to “fix” capitalism, so what could possibly go wrong there? All of this proves conclusively that, like the environment, the LESS that the liberals are involved in anything, the better the chances that things will improve..
So who is it that wants to “change” the “rules of the road”? The group that history has proven to be the worst “drivers” in America. Here we have the psychotic and under medicated liberals “driving” the economy around, a group who figures that if they make enough left turns, they eventually might arrive at their destination. It’s this “destination” that worries us..