Princess Porcelain Puss, or Nancy “Where’s my 727” Pelosi is without question the premier “purveyor of partisan politics”. If you ask her, the “problem” lies with others. No, the “problem” is Pelosi’s lies..
In an article entitled, “Pelosi Denies She’s Partisan, Accuses GOP of ‘Process’ Politics”, Pelosi, a nearly seventy year old liberal with absolutely no conscience (or wrinkles..) whatsoever, isn’t “bothered” by what others have to say about her. You have to admire her feral concentration, the defiled Demokrats have a “mission” and this shameless serpent is the best choice to “lead” the progressive pogrom. “Pelosi denies she’s partisan”? Next we will hear, “Moore denies he’s obese” or “Reid denies he’s a rodent”..
Nancy Pelosi comes from the left coast, specifically the “city by the gay”. Pelosi hails from one of the “safest Democratic districts in the country”. The dystrophic deviants there have voted Demokratic since 1949 and Pelosi has been sent back eleven times to continue her dirty work. She has never participated in a debate or forum against other candidates and she is one of the largest contributors to other like-minded Demokratic destructivists. Another reason for that “dis-stink-tion” is that she is one of the richest members of Congress, estimated to have at least fifty million dollars in allegedly above board assets. As with all of the “monied” liberals, if you were allowed unfettered access to all of their bank books and “portfolios”, a large number of multi-million dollar “accidental oversights” or “mistakes” would undoubtedly be unearthed.
The lapse in logic that prompted Dick Gephardt to run for the Presidency in 2004, allowed the veteran virago to step up from House Minority Whip (With liberal racism being so “transparent”, I find this “Minority” and “Whip” title for a Demokrat to be all too coincidental and all too appropriate..) to the Minority Leader spot in 2002.
One of the Pelosi “bipartisan” victories very early into her tenure as Minority leader was the defeat of the privatization of Social Security. The Demokratic dominatrix “imposed intense party discipline” (she just can’t get away from the Whip thing..) which led to the defeat of the measure. Please note that in 2009, this type of party “unanimity” is otherwise known as being “acrimonious” or “process politics”.
Pelosi also worked against the bringing of impeachment proceedings against Bush. In a way, you have to feel for someone whose primary responsibility it is to hand out the psychotropic medications to her parasitic party members who caper and cavort under the liberal hammer and sickle flag before they expose their Demokratic disorders to the CSPAN cameras in the gallery..
This was no “bipartisan” favor for Bush. The primary difference between the impeachment of Clinton and the ridiculous rumors of an impeachment for Bush was that Clinton was GUILTY of at least one impeachable offense. On the other hand, the maladjusted mental meanderings of lunatic liberals like Dennis “I’ve seen a UFO” Kucinich and Robert Wexler had absolutely no basis in fact. (Fact: a liberal four letter word, to be included with “work” and “soap”..)
The liberal histrionics and diarrhea epidemics had to do with America and its War on Terror, a war that still frightens the liberals more than their friends, the radicals on the rugs.. Pelosi knew that the liberal “Chamberlainian impulse” along with a spotlight suddenly cast upon their cowardly “appeasement gene” and the liberal aversion to defending America from attack, would all stand in the way of the plan to take the midterm elections by deceit.
Even through the “historic moment for the women of this country ” driven drivel of her speech in acceptance of her new role as Speaker of the House, the liberal urge to lie was too much to restrain, “I accept his gavel in the spirit of partnership, not partisanship”.. “We may belong to different parties but we serve one country”.. The only people who actually get the olive branch from the liberals are the terrorists and their enablers because the fact is, they both share similar objectives for the American economy and its citizens which makes for a perfect progressive partnership.
Compulsive lying is reflexive to the Botox Bolshevik who was quoted in the article as saying, “There seems to be a market for saying that I am very partisan.” A “market”? Not big enough, try a “mall”.. She prattled on, “Republicans were complaining about the legislative process as a political ploy because they were losing the battle.”
To the left, “the legislative process” has become null and void because, “I won.” The “complaining” was the result of the liberal demands for complete compliance with their desire to “hurry” their chicanery through and the LACK of what used to pass for a “political process”. Here was a bill that truly made “history”, nothing of this ridiculous magnitude had ever been tabled before and the liberals wanted it passed sight unseen. The reality was that the left was “complaining” that their “political ploy” of subverting the “political process” was meeting with sensible resistance.
“If you can’t win on policy, then you go to process”. “If you can’t win on process, then you go to personality”.. Try, if you can, to follow the bouncing Bolshevik ball.. Any step away from the rote recitations of the stock Demokratic diversions always causes the liberals to stumble. (They invariably remind me of when Private Louden Downey is on the stand in “A Few Good Men” .. “Hal…Hal..”)
The opposition disagreed with the “policy” of “infinite deficits and perpetual promissory notes”, they were not allowed to be a part of the “process” and identifying Pelosi as being politically “partisan” is “personal”. “Partisan” is not defamation of character when applied to Pelosi, it is definition of character.
Allow me just TWO examples of liberal credibility/partisanship. FLIP: “The deficit is going to be a symbol of their credibility problem, and the budget is going to be the document we use”, Rham Emanuel (L-Ill. then, Obama Generalissimo now) over a $375 billion dollar deficit.. (USA Today 02/21/04 “Democrats will use deficits to attack Bush, GOP credibility”.) FLOP: The opposition also disagreed with the “speed” demands from the formerly methodical Marxists who used to weep and moan, “Where’s the exit plan?”/”We rushed into war”..
Who can forget the “good old days” when “complaining” was progressively patriotic.. Connecticut, 2003: “I am sick and tired of people who say that if we debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you are not patriotic.. (Liberals absolutely aren’t and to prove it, their idea of being “patriotic” is having everyone else paying more taxes, right, Joe?) “We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration..” The “acrimonious” ways of old have to give way to the “historic” President and Speaker and their Demokratic destructiveness.
“I can’t be bothered about what they say about me, all I am interested in is getting the job done”.. When Pelosi speaks, combined with the liberal aversion to “definitional specificity”, this “job” part is what concerns the cognizant amongst us.