According to the Washington Post, (“Obama says Iran’s energy concerns legitimate”) our “Peerless Leader” has now said that Iran has “some right to nuclear energy”.. Here is the important part: “..provided it takes steps to prove its aspirations are peaceful..” Mr. “No Details” also left out the MOST IMPORTANT part: What is he willing to do to ASSURE that these “aspirations” are “peaceful” other than TAKING THEIR WORD FOR IT..
During the BBC interview which was broadcast on June 2nd, Obama even in his own words continued his tradition of speaking “without going into specifics..” NOTHING demands the need for specificity MORE than the terrorist greenhouse of Iran and it’s “nudge, nudge, wink, wink..” nuclear “energy” aspirations..
Obama’s answer to the issue? “Direct diplomacy with Tehran to encourage it to set aside any ambitions for nuclear weapons it might harbor..” Pray tell, who will be doing all of this “diplomacy” business? Barack “Present” Obama and Rodham, otherwise known as “Ms. Pantsuit Moot”.. Our Secretary of Statists, who couldn’t “diplomatically” convince the “First Philanderer” to keep his weenie out of every campfire in sight is going to “convince” Iran that it should keep its “aspirations peaceful”?
Since Obama feels that “Iran may have some right to nuclear energy”, could he convey that same right to America? If he and the liberals are as concerned about “energy independence” (oxymoron) as they bray that they are, then why haven’t they produced a few dozen nuclear power plants here in America? The bottom line is that more people have died as a direct result of being in the Clinton administration than have died as a result of nuclear power in the United States of America..
If the sagacious socialist took the time to dissect the quote within the article, he might see the concerns that go beyond his destructively driven agendas. “..encourage it to set aside any ambitions for nuclear weapons that it might harbor..” His Muslim friends and those who are percolating within the cauldrons of radical Islam within this “country” have “ambitions” that they “harbor” that Obama’s approval of their “right to nuclear energy” will enable to come to an explosive fruition.
“Iran has insisted its nuclear program is aimed at generating electricity”. No one wants to believe that tripe more than Barack Hussein Obama. I am of the opinion that Iran’s “nuclear program” is aimed at ISRAEL.
With the liberal’s insistence upon the neutering of the CIA and their demands that the military be emasculated, there will be no substance behind the empty rhetoric that Obama and Rodham will humorously call “direct diplomacy”. Another “signed document” from another Hitler with a different shaped moustache and a greasy leisure suit is of no consequence to anyone other than the appeasement-oriented progressives and the pimply “don’t draft me” campus cowards.
“But the U.S. and other Western governments accuse Tehran of seeking atomic weapons.” Since the “U.S.” accuses Tehran, what are “they” going to do about it? “They” is Obama and his crew of “progressive pacifisters”. Their answer? “Direct diplomacy”. “Open a dialogue.” “Reach out.” In short, the liberals want to talk the Muslims to death. The rest of us would prefer a more expeditious/explosive method as opposed to the useless verbal calisthenics endorsed by the left.
Obama says, “the international community has a very real interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in the region.” Who is this “international community”? Can they speak for themselves or did the United States elect a “King of the World” back in November? This “international community” talk invariably arises whenever Obama wants to act as though he is not imposing “values on another country with a different history and a different culture..” (More on this juicy quote later in the program..)
The left is so afraid of acting in the best interests of America and it’s allies that it HAS to create an “international community”. There is no doubt that when the topic of nuclear weapons in Iran is being discussed, there IS an “international community” with a “very real interest”. Would they please step forward and speak up with an alternative plan or two, other than another round of useless chin wagging by the “ego with ears”? If not, your “de facto spokesman” will continue his “politics of passive persuasion” which might negatively “impact” your country..
A man that would willingly “trade” our ballistic missile defense capabilities in order to get a hug from any demented despot or delusional dictator isn’t someone that I would want speaking for me within the “international community”.. It’s bad enough that he now speaks for “America”.. (60,000,000 actual “Americans” in November disagreed with that dangerous irrationality..)
In Prague last month, Obama said he would “support Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections”..(which is something that the green weenies here in America would not allow..) “If Iran proves it is no longer a nuclear threat..” “Proves” to whom, Barack “The True Believer” Obama? Will the vaunted U.N. be handling these “rigorous inspections”? Will we need to call Hans Blix out of retirement again? Will the Iranians shudder with fear at the thought of the powder blue helmets amassing on their borders? Doesn’t this “international community” understand by now that the Obama “defense strategy” is “roll over and play dead”?
“Timetables” when the left disagrees are mandatory but here Obama says, “Although I don’t want to put artificial time tables on that process, Tehran has until the end of the year to show it wants to engage..” Sounds like a timetable to me.. That will be plenty of time for the Iranians to step up their “peaceful” nuclear weapons program to the point of no return. As the Iranians “engage” the idiot liberals, as the flash bulbs pop, as another progressive parchment is signed and there are wet kisses and hugs all around, as his liberal predecessor has done before him, Obama will have produced “peace in our time..”
Talk is cheap and that is why it is so important to the progressive poofters. “What we want to do is open a dialogue.. you know, there are misapprehensions about the West on the part of the Muslim world and obviously there are some big misapprehensions about the Muslim world when it comes to those of us in the West..” Let’s take a look at two very important words in that protracted paragraph of piffle..
“Obviously”. When used by the gullible galoot, this is intended as a swipe at the “obvious” “Islamophobia” within the backwards United States.. The word “obvious” for those of us who have not forgotten, involves the “Magnificent Nineteen” as they are known in the Muslim “world” (cesspool) and their actions which have never been denounced with any ferocity by the those within the fetid “Muslim world”..
“Big”. Why according to Obama whose father was a Muslim, are the “misapprehensions” “big” from “those of us in the West”? Would it have anything to do with that rather large hole in lower Manhattan that the practitioners of the “religion of peace” put there? Remember that place, the one where you just did a “drive by shooting” for over $328,000.00 tax dollars? How about the Pentagon which went from a five-sided building to a four-sided one for awhile? What about the Shanksville Pennsylvania monument to the victims of flight 93? The Muslim “extremists” who have the tacit approval of the “Muslim world” have some pretty “Big” misapprehensions themselves and in case you have forgotten Mr. President, a number of them carrying box cutters carried them out in 2001..
“Obama added that there is a danger “when the United States or any other country, thinks we can simply impose these values on another country with a different history and a different culture..” Nonsense, the REAL danger involves Obama or any number of his flaccid administration “negotiating” with Iran over their nuclear “ambitions” while being gulled by their alleged “peaceful aspirations”..