Easing Kremlin Concerns

Our lovable but gullible galoot sat down yesterday with Dmitry Medvedev, the President of Russia..or is he the Prime Minister of Russia..or is Putin the President or is he the Prime Minister.. Never mind, the engineer of the “erratum express” is negotiating with world leaders regardless of what their clumsy and confusing titles seem to be.. Why wasn’t the “Obama Gaffe Czar” around to properly chaperone the 143-day wonder? It’s hard to determine if having Obama yakking with Presidents and Prime Ministers is better or worse than having Rodham doing it..

Everything from cutting off South Korean dignitaries by going to the wrong podium, reading the wrong teleprompter, handing out idiotic and thoughtless gifts or confusing the titles of world leaders convinces the entire planet that this President and Vice President are sorely in need of a accompanying laugh track or at least prerecorded rim shots.. (“I suspect when I speak to President..eh..Prime Minister Putin tomorrow..” Obama trips over Russian leadership tandem Reuters)

Let me spell it out for the Obama administration free of charge: Putin: Geppetto. Medvedev: Pinocchio.. Second clue for the brilliant liberals: Look for the strings attached to the appendages of marionette Medvedev..

Obama immediately described Medvedev as “straightforward, professional and trustworthy”, three descriptors that have eluded Obama throughout his short and amazingly inept political career.

Obama was there to “usher in a new era of friendship after the damage” that was done “during the Bush administration.” (In Confidence- Building Effort, Obama Trusts, Medvedev Empathizes” Foxnews) You have to wonder why Obama doesn’t understand that maybe, just maybe, something done or not done by Prime Minister/President/KGB Chief Putin led to this alleged “damage”.

After all when Bush met with Putin in Camp David in 2001, Bush said, “I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy..” I suppose that Obama, who is not unfamiliar with the plagiarizing of others, just “borrowed” the words from Bush to describe Medvedev as a matter of convenience..

Obama said that Medvedev is “also interested in finding out what the interests of the United States are.” If Medvedev is at all concerned about what Obama’s interests are, I can save him the trouble as I will wager that he already has the appropriate texts on his bookshelves. Just find any tome written by Marx and find any history book covering the “works” of Stalin and you will have a concise read of the “interests” of Obama..

In case no one has “briefed” Obama, the “damage” that was done to the Bush/Putin “relationship”, came to a head when Putin started crowing about “missile defense” in Europe. Also the “relationship” between Russia and Iran might have played a role.. Here Russia began “trading” missile technology (not to mention nuclear technologies as well..) to the Iranians and the American missile defense if implemented in the region would have made the technology that Iran just bought moot. The Iranians wanted the Russians to start telling tall tales about how this missile “defense” would threaten the Russians in hopes of causing the United States to back down. It didn’t work. Yet.. Now with a limp wristed liberal in office, the chances for capitulation are infinitely higher.

“There was no statement of Russian readiness to help the United States persuade Iran to abandon its nuclear ambitions..” In case Obama is kind of in the dark (sorry for the pun) on this one, Russia is the one that has been enabling this whole Iranian nuclear ambition business, probably with both hardware and raw materials.. They are probably screwing the oil rich Iranians to death on this and they will never be all too enthusiastic about killing the goose-steppers that are laying the golden eggs..

When your job is to stand up for America, “damage” is occasionally done to those whose ulterior motives aren’t in the best interests of the United States or it’s allies. If Obama is all about being “friends” and repairing “damage”, then why did he say during an interview prior to this summit that “Putin still had one foot in the old, Cold War way of doing things..”? Wow, both acrimonious and accurate for once. Now however, all bets are off and it is time to cuddle and cajole..

Obama is “hoping to ease Kremlin concerns” by promising that “an assessment of whether the missile defense would actually work would be finished by late summer and he would share initial U.S. thoughts with Medvedev..” (Obama, Medvedev agree to cut nuke weapons” apnews myway) Here a man who habitually lies to American public wants to be honest with the Russians to “ease their concerns”..

He continued on by saying that the missile defense installations “were not being built to intercept missiles from ‘a mighty Russian arsenal.’” If the “mighty Russian arsenal” sends a few missiles towards any of the American allies in the region, this system had better do some serious intercepting.. The “concerns” of the American allies in the region had better turn to deciding whether or not Obama will come to their aid or sell them down the river so that he can be “friends” with Medvedev and Putin..

There were allegedly eight “deals” made between the two, one of which will allow American arms and military personnel to cross Russian land and air space in route to Afghanistan. In case the Russians might have forgotten, we are trying to do what the “mighty Russian arsenal” couldn’t do from 1979-1989. (With Obama as the “Commander in Chief”, will this now become the same type of “engagement” as Russia’s was, an exercise in futility where the troops pay the ultimate price for his tomfoolery?)

The “White House” immediately said that this deal would “save $133 million a year”. “A year?” What is Obama’s “exit plan” for this war? What is his “time table” for withdrawal from this campaign? Just how many “years” is he talking about? You may also write this “$133 million a year” off as the same numerical nonsense as his “save a million jobs” baloney.. (He had better get around to “saving” a few, he and his “stimulus plans” have already hemorrhaged nearly three million..)

Then it was onto the “START” replacement pact. “Each side” is to reduce a number of warheads, launch vehicles and the range with which they can travel. My question is, where will the warheads “travel” once the Russians “reduce” them.. North Korea? Iran? Barack “The True Believer” won’t care, it’s all about being friends and signing treaties..

Medvedev called the plan a “reasonable compromise”. I wonder why such “reasonable compromises” are so easily obtained with foreign dignitaries but the concept is all but extinct when it comes to Obama and his commerce and transactions with American Republicans?

It was all about “easing concerns”. Obama had to ease the concerns of Biden that he would not forget to bring back a few potent potables so that he can restock his cabinet but primarily it was about “easing Kremlin concerns”..

With this President and his staff of “Keystone Cop Communists”, I wish that he could find a way to “ease” America’s concerns first..


41 responses to “Easing Kremlin Concerns

  1. It’s EASY, just push the RESET button. Now, don’t feel better?

  2. Excellent, excellent article Larry. Excuse my naivety but shouldn’t Hillary be doing a bit more world hopping? Where is she and what is she doing? Nobody seems to know. And poor old, confused Obambi calling Putin president…that must be the mother of all faux pas! I love your Pinocchio/Geppetto analogy. And you are absolutely right about the Russia/Iran relations. We will probably never know how much damage the Russians have caused by hopping into a uranium laced bed with the Ayatollahs and the sheep herder Ahmadinejad. But only wide-eyed Obambi could refuse to accept certain facts especially if it involves his beloved Muslim world. Bush was hard on Putin as he knew exactly what Putin was/is. We should keep a distance from them and not declaring a new ‘friendship’ with them which is doomed to failure.

    Thanks and best regards – you do realise we are still in the minority don’t you?


  3. noleftturnz


    Yes ma’am, I do..

    The “not-so-silent” minority..

    Thanks for your kind words,


  4. Take Manuel Zaleya, Honduras, and 2009. Substitute Obama, United States, and 2011 and you have the exact same story…..The pro-liberty forces threw that lying marxist Zaleya out for breaking constitutional law. Obama thinks international backing will help him when the 2011 U.S. coup kicks his ass out. Honduran Style…

  5. Larry,
    By the way, Great article as usual!!!

  6. noleftturnz


    Thanks for the comments and welcome aboard.

    Honduras decided that the Constitution meant more than the dictator.

    THAT is what has Obama sweating..The idea of “freedom” in Honduras making its way to “Amerika”..

    Thanks as always,


  7. Patton understood how the Russians play chess but never was allowed near the board. Our mahogany messiah and his liberal minions are way out of their league. Putin is probably laughing all the way to the bank. I was suprised he even met with Obamayomommantaxthehelloutofthemiddleclasslikesheepmanureoffateflonshovelbeforetheyall wakeupandkickourrearendsoutofoffice.

  8. “mahogany messiah” Too funny.

    What’s not funny is this inexperienced, incompetent ass making a fool out of himself (and America, indirectly) all over the world.

  9. Spot on and hilarious as usual. Obama can’t wait to give away the farm signing all sorts of unilateral disarmament agreements. As it stands like you pointed out, the domestic opposition ought to take a page from foreign leaders, such as the Soviets er… I mean “Russians”. They obviously are running this guy like a dutch uncle and are fleecing him at his own game. They simply say NO. Now if the domestic opposition would just do the same instead of demurring to his historic election and all that bullshit, we might be able to get rid of this loser. Its so patently obvious that this is probably the most incompetent administration in history, (apologies to the Carter administration). The only thing keeping the lid on this disaster is the culpability of the MSM which says absolutely nothing about the amateurish mismanagement of the affairs of state by these impostors. Frankly I don’t think they are qualified to run a lemonade stand.

  10. Is this the softer, kinder, gentler, easy diplomacy that he calls change? Or is it hope? It literally makes me uptight and nervous to listen to him speak. So, I don’t listen and depend on Larry to hit the highlights. Thanks again, Larry@

    My hope is that the rest of the world knows that all Americans are not like Obama! I would think that the real MEN in this country are quite embarrassed by the Pres. And, the real WOMEN in this country wouldn’t want this guy anywhere near them.

    This is not the articulate guy that everyone promoted last year. If he does not have a teleprompter and has to wing it he is disastrous at the podium. I wasn’t the least surprised that he bungled the titles.

    It’s a very dark time for America. I continue to believe BO is dangerous. I’m just glad he didn’t give all our defense weapons to Russia.

  11. beyond disgusted


    Again, you have so nailed the Marxist! I continue to be embarrassed and ashamed that BHO was ever elected in the first place.

    On that note, there is an excellent article in nationalreviewonline that I totally agree with. It is way past time we started using their own tactics against them. How about it, Republican politicians, do any of you have a set? Here is the link:


  12. noleftturnz


    The media is also being played here..

    When Helen Thomas gets her dander up you know that something is about to pop.

    If the MSM had even a shread of dignity they would really unload. OUR opinion of them must not mean that much to them. Their opinions of each other is a different story.

    Thanks as always,


  13. Bob Bartoe

    You know, Larry, every paragraph in this article is document to the blatant abuse being performed against this country by the camel jockey in charge.

    He is Muslim. He is an Indonesian citizen born in Kenya. His initial citizenship, at birth, was British. This man is a fraud and a traitor! We will most likely find that he is an illegal alien.

    Please go to AmericanGrandJury.org and find out how you all can help to throw out the usurper. He is evil and fatal to our country. He and his ilk must be removed as quickly as possible.

  14. noleftturnz


    Well put..

    All liberals believe in their “hearts of darkness” that they are articulate, brilliant and vastly more intelligent than you or I.

    The bluster and the blather is all just a cover for the reality of their individually overwhelming simplicity bordering upon ignorance..

    They love to parody Republicans as “dumb”. Case in point, President Reagan.

    Carter: Genius.

    Kerry: Brilliant

    Bush: Dumb..

    When they get together at their elitist gatherings where they enjoy the aroma of each other’s farts, they giggle and snort about their Solomonic perspicacity. An insight that is based upon the monosyllabic and baseless retorts to the evidence presented by others which systematically dismantles their intellectual straw men..

    I laugh at their unquestionable imbecility and their questionable hygiene..

    Thanks as always,


  15. noleftturnz


    This little story has never gone away..

    The left with only occasinally refer to it as “nonsense” at which time they quickly change the subject..

    If the story is all buncome, Obama could nip it in the bud by “transparently” displaying all of the evidence to disprove the theory and the “story” would then go away..

    If it is all a lie, disprove it and everyone will be done with it.

    Simple, right?

    Thanks as always,


  16. Tamara and et al,

    For those who wonder where Hillary is I think I can say what’s going on with the Clinton’s and Obama. He is one shrewd dude, that’s for sure. Always remember he is a conniving and manipulative SOB who will take down his critics even before they realized they were played..

    Let’s start with who started this type of politics. In the mid 1960’s, Lyndon Johnson started hiring his politic rivals to his cabinet because he could keep a better eye on them. He just said it in a more comical way. The full quote is… “I’d rather have them inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in.”

    This is another “steal” that Obama has taken from another politician. Hillary Clinton has the title “Secretary of State” but to be honest she has no real power in this administration. Obama has others doing the diplomacy.

    It may appear odd to describe a Secretary of State as marginalized, but Obama has surrounded Hillary Clinton with his people and carved up her jurisdiction geographically. Former Sen. George Mitchell (D-Maine) is in charge of Arab-Israeli relations. Dennis Ross has Iran. Former U.N. Ambassador Dick Holbrooke has Pakistan and Afghanistan. And Hillary has to share her foreign policy role on the National Security Council (NSC) with Vice President Biden, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, CIA chief Leon Panetta, and NSC staffer Samantha Powers (who once called Hillary a “monster”). He has his people watching her and he recently gave Bill some minor duties.

    These peers who are competitors and subordinates who can deal directly with the president, Hillary was reduced to announcing foreign aid packages for Pakistan while Holbrooke does the heavy lifting. She has no real diplomacy duties and I cannot think if she had known this is what she would be doing she would have stayed in the Senate. We all know that Obama doesn’t want to give the details on anything.
    But, part of Hillary’s problem and frustration is the institutional shrinking of the State Department in the Obama Administration. Knowing what a manipulator he is. I would not put it passed him to have given her the wrong Russian word for “restart” as an embarrassment for her, I would bet that she went on one of her verbal tirades and colorful vocabulary that she is well known for. Obama wants total control at all times so I cannot imagine he would not take control of that. Do not piss her off but I’m sure is playing this close to the vest.
    During the Bush years, while war raged, the Defense Department became more relevant to the conduct of foreign policy. And, under Obama, the financial crisis has propelled the Treasury to the forefront of this Administration. The State Department, with its emphasis on traditional diplomacy, has been forced to take a back seat. Even though Obama appointed Hillary, he clearly has not been willing to make her a co-president and confines her to the diminished role of her department.
    For his part, Bill Clinton has been asked to be a special envoy to Haiti. Yes, Haiti. Obama’s predecessor George Bush asked the former president to orchestrate the response to the Asian tsunami and then to Hurricane Katrina. Obama gives him Haiti.
    Meanwhile, both Clintons are effectively muzzled and cannot criticize Obama even as he reverses President Clinton’s free market proclivities and budget balancing discipline. Hillary, the supposed friend of Israel, must sit by quietly and watch Iran get the bomb while trying all the while to stop Israel from preventing it. Bill had to give up his “relationship” with the emir of Dubai and the United Arab Emirates because Hillary took that post and part of the offer from Obama was they had to give that up. So, the Clinton’s are two pissed off politicians.
    Obama has hidden and silenced his predecessors and has hidden his rival in plain sight at the upper reaches of the government and his Administration. It’s quite a brilliant move on his part; they cannot criticize him so long as his popularity numbers remain high. Hillary would just get ripped by the media the same way they did when she ran for the seat that Obama got.
    Hillary won’t keep quite for long, she’s hired a publicist to mold and change her imagine. She’s still a bitch (no offense to female dogs the world over, which have more elegance and poise than Ms. Rodham has). She’s still very angry and hurt when the media’s turned on her. The question to Obama is how long will Hillary subject herself to this political discipline straight-jacket? Until his popularity numbers are above 50, Hillary will have to grin and bare it. Should his high ratings fade (and the public is getting tired of the “we inherited this economy deal) and they most likely will since the Stimulus isn’t doing what they said it would. The more he tries to control 50 balls in the air, both she and Bill will be there to jump ship and try to save themselves. We will hear how they argued with Obama and felt she could no longer do her job and be effective.. But while he is on top of his game, she’ll stay loyal to their party.
    But she and her once powerful position are shrinking by the day. Once Obama’s equal — and before that his superior — she now looks tiny compared to the president, she’s more vulnerable. Her current role is more like a senior staff member hoping to rise in the bureaucracy. No longer at the head of a movement or the symbol of rising women in politics, she has faded into the State Department woodwork. She is much less visible than her predecessors Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, James Baker, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell or Condi Rice because Obama doesn’t want her talking with the press. One has to go back to the likes of Warren Christopher (Bill Clinton’s first Secretary of State) or William Rogers (Richard Nixon’s first Secretary of State) to find a secretary of State as far down the totem poll as possible. Obama is using the same trick as Clinton did with Warren Christopher. This diminished status has got to exasperate her and Bill both, especially knowing what will happen in their future, which will be the same as Christopher. But they are trapped in Obama’s web and cannot easily escape.

  17. DA STROV YA! A Russian salute in the Kremlin by the two (three) liars.

    Great article Larry. So true and don’t we all wish he would ease the “concerns” of the American people instead of the Russian government.

  18. Did anyone happen to see the interview BHO had with Fox? The one that when asked about the United States winning the cold war he replied that “There were a whole bunch of people, uh, through out Eastern Europe that showed enormous courage , and I think that it is very important in this part of the world to acknowledge the degree to which people struggled for their own freedom. We don’t have to diminish other people uh, to uh, recognize our role in that history” So let me see, the president once again goes to a foreign country and puts us down, says that we, The United States of America, had nothing to do with the fall of communism. Hmmm… How much more of our history will he re-write? Not only is he going to turn this great nation of ours into a socialist state, he thinks that he can diminish the role that we have played in bringing freedom to folks all over the world. So what’s next? That we played a minor part in freeing Europe from the nazis and fascists? That we really didn’t have that much to do with driving the imperialists from the Pacific? Where does it end? Hopefully next year the people will wake up and start by putting some candidates in office that can counter our esteemed president, before it’s to late.

  19. noleftturnz


    Great work as always but give me your thoughts on this:

    Both Clintons have what I like to call “screw you” money. They don’t NEED to work ever again.

    At what point does the loss of one’s personal dignity cause them to say “enough!”?

    Imagine if either Clinton came forward and gave an “expose”..Such a bold move would signify one thing.. Thinking 2012.

    In my opinion, the possibility for that happening isn’t as far fetched as you might imagine.

    Fast forward to 2011..Obama has made a complete mess of everything that he has touched.. Watch the timeframe that the Clintons begin to distance themselves, the earlier the more this becomes plausable..Bill first.

    Bill will do so to “test the waters”. Hillary still WANTS to be a political player. Bill has had the brass ring (and tarnished it too, but that’s another story..)

    The same carpet bombing that the media poured onto the Republicans in ’08 will be replicated by the internet against the Demos in ’11. Who knows, maybe they too might rediscover their dignity and go all “Helen Thomas” on Obama.

    Hillary might give it another try as she sprints to the “middle” and starts waving the flag to beat the band. A clue to this might be an olive branch and alot of time in public with John McCain, the conduit between center and right..Will the “gang of fourteen” become the gang of fifteen?

    The “big chance” given to the Demos which was then sufficiently mangled by them will spell the need for “change”.

    Hillary will have to try..this may also explain why someone with such an affection for the spotlight suddenly has no problem relinquishing it..It’s just another page on a basically empty resume.

    Time will tell but when was the last time that either of the Clintons were as far out of the spotlight as Howard Dean?

    Thanks as always,


  20. noleftturnz


    It would be nice if America was occasionally a “concern” for him as opposed to an experiment in twenty first century socialism..

    Thanks as always,


  21. noleftturnz

    Michael P.,

    Maybe he isn’t trying to rewrite history..

    No one can seem to find his college transcripts so the possibility exists that he has never read or studied history.

    He could be just taking a guess based upon his comic books and the Saturday morning cartoons he is allowed to watch when he isn’t grounded..

    Just a thought.

    Thanks as always,


  22. G. Nichols

    A retarded monkey could handle our foreign policy better than thses clowns running things into the ground in Washington. None of them bothered to do their homework and at least find out whom does what over there. Obama has eased Kremlin concerns alright, they know they have nothing to worry about from here.

  23. Alabama Redneck

    Larry: Another fantastic article shedding light on our mentally challenged fake president. Granted he has made some domestic political decisions by bringing the Clintons down to their lowest level since the Watergate scandals but I would not put money on whether or not they can make a come back. They still have many FOB’s and they learned some new lessons for the Great One. Which by the way reminded me of an email I received>

    “Obama and God have only one thing in common…NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE.. The difference is – God does not think He is Obama.

    O ne
    B ig
    A ss
    M istake
    A merica

    Eileen: Your insight and take on the entire situation concerning the Clintons and their diminised political role is truly outstanding. You and Larry make a great team in honestly analyzing the corrupt and illegal power structure in DC. Please keep you comments coming.

    Another issue: Would be nice if we could organizes all the tea party people into a million or two march on Washington at about the time they get ready to vote on this monstrous Health Care bill. Just a thought.

    Kudos to all the family and their comments. I know I am not alone.

  24. Larry,
    Both Clintons have what I like to call “screw you” money. They don’t NEED to work ever again.
    Well, that is true but their egos most likely could not handle living off 20 million. Specifically Bill’s ego certainly needs to be “massaged” on a regular basis. I believe the Clinton’s think the more money you have the more powerful you become. So they both want to get as many dollars that they can before taking down Komrade Obama. They clearly saw how much money Obama made during the 2008 election. So if they want to seek higher political offices, they need to get a lot of dough. This may be why Obama said they would have to give that up. I’m sure they weighed the pros and cons but had no idea that Obama would played them both. They are supposedly hypothetical to be very savvy to political games and they met their rival who turns out to be better at it. I’m sure both are livid at being played so shrewdly by their Master.
    At what point does the loss of one’s personal dignity cause them to say “enough!”?
    Uhm, they’re the Clinton’s. Look at the things they have done over the years; when have they ever had dignity? I think power overweighs dignity in their eyes. I’m sure there is much more to this whole thing. They have knowledge of Obama and he has it on them. Who will make the first move?
    Imagine if either Clinton came forward and gave an “expose”..Such a bold move would signify one thing.. Thinking 2012.
    The Clinton could “expose” Obama’s secrets, do they know whether Obama isn’t a natural citizen (and wasn’t Hillary the one who brought that up during the elections of both McCain and Obama birth records were challenged, McCain give his birth certificate, Obama, not). I’m sure they do and will also reveal that should the media turn against Obama and his administration. They will have to again wait until the time is right before exposing that sham. I think it goes deeper then that and Obama knows it. Bill and Hillary want to return to the White House and they will do anything to go back. I cannot find the evidence to this, this is only my personal viewpoint. I think the Clinton’s found a way to bypass the Constitutional mandate that a person couldn’t run for President more then twice. They can put Hillary out in front while Bill does the day to day decisions as the real President. We have never had a President and First Lady who were both political. They could pull it off so long as the Democrats and the press would allow them to do this.
    In my opinion, the possibility for that happening isn’t as far fetched as you might imagine.
    See the above comment.
    Fast forward to 2011..Obama has made a complete mess of everything that he has touched.. Watch the timeframe that the Clintons begin to distance themselves, the earlier the more this becomes plausible.. Bill first.
    Well, I’m sure they both will time it just right, if they do it too soon the other Democrats will label them as spoil sports. Too late the public could question why they chose to not voice their concerns, Obama has already reverse some of Clinton policies, and I’m betting it’s not sitting to well with Bill. Let’s not forget that there are a large number of Clinton Administration appointees in this current administration. Who are they loyal too? Those that are loyal to the Clinton could be their Obama spies and passing information that is going behind the scenes. This type of politics is generally hated by the public. If it’s done too contrived or appears too scheming the results could backfire on the Clinton’s.
    Bill will do so to “test the waters”. Hillary still WANTS to be a political player. Bill has had the brass ring (and tarnished it too, but that’s another story..)
    He could put a Clinton PAC into place to, as you said to test the waters to see if the public would be amendable to having her run again. I personally don’t think they will. We’ve are done with the political games, American in generally fed up with the Federal Government. The Clinton’s are known as game players and Bill wrote many of the rules so I don’t think the public would be so amenable to have them back in the White House. If Hillary tries to re-run for her Senate seat, she wouldn’t get re-elected.
    The same carpet bombing that the media poured onto the Republicans in ‘08 will be replicated by the internet against the Demos in ‘11. Who knows, maybe they too might rediscover their dignity and go all “Helen Thomas” on Obama.
    I’d have serious doubts about that Larry. The Democrats have a hard time acknowledging or listening to the public. How many times have they listened to us over the last 6 months. They are more interested in helping the lobbyist and special interest groups that have barrels of cash at their disposal. To the democrats, money talks, but will the public balk and I think the public will see through the calculated political realignment.
    Hillary might give it another try as she sprints to the “middle” and starts waving the flag to beat the band. A clue to this might be an olive branch and a lot of time in public with John McCain, the conduit between center and right. Will the “gang of fourteen” become the gang of fifteen?
    Probably not it would mean admitting to defeat from the democrats and the press will eat her alive if she aligned herself with John McCain but, McCain might be open to it through he wanted a female Vice President he just chose the wrong female so it would be what type of taxpayers does he want to reach. The moderate republican or a moderate democrat. He’s the moderate republican and Hillary tried running as a moderate democrat but either are moderates. The public is fed up with these labels and most of the candidates say one thing and do another. The next election the general public will be looking for a candidate who hasn’t been in politics all their lives. Which would hurt the Clinton’s political future? They are sick to death of these career politicians. Running for office should be limited, not a lifetime job. There are tons of lawn signs and billboards here in Mobile that say… Got Term Limits? Or Just says Term Limits. One is very clever and has a milk mustache with politician’s faces above the lip of those that have served far too long. People here have just had it and some are worried about where Obama is taking us. Let’s see… since the election in November, we have had a gun show every month. They are arming themselves knowing eventually Obama and the liberal Supreme Court, especially if Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed, will go after the guns.
    What I think will happen is states run by democratic governors and state legislators will bring up anti-gun legislation that will be challenge by the National Rifle Association (who are big lobbyist for the Republicans) that will take the challenge to the Supreme Court which will rule in favor of States banning gun laws. But that’s another discussion for the future.
    The “big chance” given to the Demos which was then sufficiently mangled by them will spell the need for “change”.
    I agree.
    Hillary will have to try.. this may also explain why someone with such affection for the spotlight suddenly has no problem relinquishing it.. It’s just another page on a basically empty resume.
    Are you referring to Bill, Hillary or both? Because both lap up the spotlight like a moth or insect to a bright light. If they get to close they’re dead. We already know them as game players so Hillary will have to live with political disappointment. I cannot recall a former President who still needs to be in the spotlight as much as him. Jimmy Carter has suddenly decided to make it known that he’s still alive, and just as stupid as he was when he was President. They distance themselves from the foreign policies from this administration, which could be hard to do knowing she’s the Secretary of State. So expose this sham could backfire on them. They will have to be subtle which both have no idea what that means.
    Time will tell but when was the last time that either of the Clintons were as far out of the spotlight as Howard Dean?
    Dean is their nemesis, who holds them responsible for going from the top of the democratic ticket in 1992 to the very bottom. He got his revenge with Obama and has stepped down from the post that Bill Clinton gave him as the head of the Democratic National Committee.

  25. What a glorious mess we are in – thanks to the Kenyan Disaster taking up valuable space in the White House. He will get his comeuppance when one of our major cities is nuked. Make that “we” – when his amateurish experiment in dealing with deadly, Godless foreign powers fails. I’m waiting for Israel to launch a preemptive strike at Iran’s nuke facilities. That could open a Pandora’s box of reactions and cross-reactions worldwide.

  26. Remember years ago when Bush was asked by a reporter about the name of some piddly nation’s president and Bush didn’t know? The lamestream liberal media went on and on about that for DAYS and DAYS.

    Yet, Obama goes abroad and makes multiple, uh, “missteps,” mangles our own history and, depending on his foreign audience, merrily merely makes up what kind of nation we are — and gets away with it. What a crock!

  27. Here is a great youtube video that is getting a lot of play. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWFb1Yvlem4

  28. Amazing, isn’t it? BHO wants to ease the concerns of the Former Soviet Union while at the same time he is attempting to clone it here in the United States!

  29. here’s another excellent vignette on You Tube( with apologies to Frank Sinatra…I’m sure he would approve).

  30. Anyone one with a real brain (liberals excluded, of course) would know Rasputin’s grandson is in charge of Russia and he, like Khushev, wants to “bury” us. Neither Medvedev or the “real” head of Russia, Putin , is “straightforward, professional and trustworthy.” If the naive ninny in OUR White House thinks the Russians will reduce any of its weapons, he’s in for a big surprise. If anything, they’re probably building them up. The old ones will continue to be distributed to our enemies all over the world.

    By the way, I wonder if the boy wonder visited the Gore family’s oil companies while he was in Russia.

  31. Kudos on the “limp wristed liberal” description of the chosen one- might have to use that one. Thanks for the article Larry!

  32. Republicans were able to stop the Senate from passing the E-verify Bill with the help from 8 Democrats who broke rank from the lying sack of crud and blinded by the light Hapless Harry. They be place in the corner for disappointing him I’m sure. Who went home to celebrate the 4th of July and got an earful from their constituents. Here are the names of those democratic Senate representatives.

    Kent Conrad (D-N.D.)
    Bryon Dorgan (D-N.D.)
    Kay Hagan (D-N.C.)
    Mary Landrieu (D-La.)
    Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.)
    Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.)
    Mark Pryor (D-Ark.)
    John Rockefeller (D-W.Va)

    Maybe we could send them a Thank you note.

  33. Here’s another video to watch from the Right to Work agency. http://righttoworkfoundation.org/LDFVPMG1T.htm

  34. Received an email this morning regarding this next Government protest. I thought I would share it with you.

    A message to all members of Patriotic Resistance

    My name is Randy Smith, President of the Western Region for One-Step promotions and
    Incentives, Inc. One Step has been designated as the as the official travel coordinators
    by the presenting sponsors (Grassfire, ResistNet and Tea Party Patriots) and co-sponsors
    for the 9/12 TaxPayer March in DC.

    All 9/12 Attendees need to do two things for the March.

    1. Register to Attend the March

    2. Arrange for your Travel and Hotels

    If you have not yet registered to attend the March, please do so immediately. Once you
    have registered for the march (click here http://www.grassfire.org/118/signup.asp) you will be
    directed on how to secure your travel arrangements. You will be redirected to the Travel
    Reservation Web Page.

    This page has tabs with info on the March, daily schedules,hotel info, maps of DC, and
    the route of the March.

    PAGE). The site is protected by VeriSign for your privacy and security.

    You will only be booking your hotel through this site. You will be asked youÔÇÖre your
    travel plans (air, bus, personal car) to help our staff prepare travel quotes. We will
    get back with them regarding quotes for air and/or bus within 24 hours.
    We are also putting bus groups together in their state that might be able to assist them
    in lowering their costs.

    We know that many attendees will have to make financial sacrifices to attend the March.
    No one will argue that money is important, but patriots realize that freedom, free
    enterprise, democracy, freedom of speech and integrity are priceless.

    Randy Smith

    President, Western Region

    One-Step Promotions and Incentives, Inc.


    (214) 986-4123

    Visit Patriotic Resistance at: http://www.resistnet.com

    To control which emails you receive on Patriotic Resistance, go to:

  35. Send a fax to Obama and Janet Napolotano to demand the withdrawal of the racist judge Sonia Sotomoyer from being confirmed. http://www.minutemanpac.com/fax.html

    There is a $20.00 donation.

  36. Another great insight on the Great Obami. Lately Ive been wondering if we really are in the minority.

    This guy is now already such a colossal failure I’m just stunned at how fast he has fallen. I never imagined he would be this incompetent or clueless (never mind arrogant, or as you Larry say, “inept”) but the whole rest of the world seems to be clued in – everywhere else in the world they know what a jackass this guy is – he makes George Bush look like a warm-up.

  37. Dan,

    All of this is actually “programmed”..

    The Statute of Limitations is about to run out on the “we inherited this mess” mantra.. It’s become akin to a package of hamburger with an expiration date, they are going to use it until it stinks to high heaven and attracts more flies than a Democratic caucus..

    This ruse will be used right up until the mid term in 2010.

    The original “plan” as revealed by Joe “Stoli”, was for this to “pay out” right about the time the mid term rolls along.

    Enter the “Blight Knight” and his freshly printed trillions..

    Just where they are going, just what will be effected is moot, he will claim to have saved the day.

    Planned and programmed. However, they just fell a little short on their “timetable”..

    Thanks as always,


  38. Margaret in CT

    Hillary has been assigned a prestigious reserved parking place–the State Department. It must make Obama giggle to think that she actually fell for his plan to sideline her. He was done with her before he appointed her.

  39. The Clinton’s brought into the same thing 52 million did as well. They have always believed they were always the smartest people in the room; they underestimated how bad he wanted it. They obviously hadn’t read or heard about this pass challengers and his clever use of local and state election policies. But in really Hillary was played just as much as Alice Palmer. Your a friend so long as you don’t get in his way.

    Larry based on the negative polls on Obama it appears that America has had enough of the “we inherited” crap. Unemployment is up and quickly rising as Obama is trying to usher in his socialist agenda before America realizes what he is doing. Unemployment here in Alabama was already high prior to the “hope” and “change” liberal clown policies have only enhanced those numbers even higher. Birmingham, Alabama is 2nd in the Country for unemployment numbers. Here is a map I found that shows just how bad his unstimulus bill not only didn’t save jobs it has only created more unemployment.

    Note the black states and no white, yellow and gold states. http://www.bls.gov/web/mstrtcr1.gif

    If you narrow it down by Metropolitan areas in the Country the statistics are very, very scary. These are the percentages from May, 2009. Here are just a few:

    El Centro, CA 26.8%
    Yuma, AZ 23.3
    Kokomo, IN 18.8
    Flint, MI 17.3
    Detroit, MI 14.9
    Los Angeles, CA 10.7
    Waterbury, CT 10.8
    Port St. Lucie, FL 12.3
    Fort Myers, FL 12.4
    Atlantic City NJ 11.3
    Lima, OH 11.4
    Myrtle Beach, SC 11.5
    Portland, OR 11.6
    Las Vegas, NV 11.1
    Sacramento, CA 11.1
    Decatur, AL 10.7
    Terre Haute, IN 10.5
    Chicago, IL 10.5
    Washington, DC 10.7
    St. Louis, MO 9.0
    Puerto Rico 14.4

    Looking at these numbers and when they started to fall is very interesting. We already know about Detroit and Flint, Michigan. In less then a year Oregon was at 5.7 to 12.4 percentage of unemployment. Portland went from 4.9 to 11.6. What happened in Oregon that changed in less then a year? I was trying to locate when the changes to the unemployment numbers occurred. Thanks to the pioneering environmentalist Oregon was once a major timber production and logging states, but thanks to the mega-lawsuits filed against Willamette Industries and others over the proper management of the extensive federal forest holdings have reduced the amount of timber produced by this state. Between 1989 and 2001 the amount of timber harvested from federal lands dropped some 96%, from 4,333 million to 173 million, although harvest levels on private land have remained relatively constant. Even the shift in recent years towards finished goods such as paper and building materials has not slowed the decline of the timber industry in the state. The effects of this decline have included Weyerhaeuser’s acquisition of Portland-based Willamette Industries in January 2002, the relocation of Louisiana-Pacific’s corporate headquarters from Portland to Nashville, and the decline of former lumber
    company towns such as Gilchrist. But note that the lumber type jobs were never replaced with other blue collar jobs, they mostly were replaced with white color technical/electronics jobs in which you most likely needed an advance degree. So that explains why the drop in employment was so sudden in less then one year. With an estimated population is 3.7 million in 2007 in total state population. The Portland metropolitan area has 2.1 million populations (2007 estimate), the 23rd-largest U.S. metro area. Shows that most residents live in or around the Portland area. Oregon’s largest for-profit private employer is Intel, located in the Silicon Forest area on Portland’s west side and employs over 16,000 employees.

    The high tech industry that seems to be drawn to the northwest region of the United States, but when the dot.com bust that hit in 2001, Oregon was hit hard. Many high technology employers reduced the number of their employees or went out of business. Open Source Development Labs made news in 2004 when they hired Linus Torvalds, developer of the Linux kernel. Recently, biotechnology giant Genentech purchased several acres of land in Hillsboro in an effort to expand its production capabilities. The world headquarters of Nike, Inc. are located near Beaverton. Also Harry and David Operations Corp. have a facility in Medford, Oregon. So that explains the rise in unemployment numbers in Oregon.
    There is a pattern to the unemployment numbers just as it shows when the economy started to tank, that’s when the Democrats took control of Congress. I would love to see if the companies that laid off their employees were also contributors to the Democrats re-election campaigns. I don’t know where you could find that information on the internet. Anyone here know where? Donations aren’t suppose to be hidden so where would I find that and wouldn’t that information fall under the heading of Personal financial disclosure reports and the Freedom of Information Act? Specifically were jobs lost so that the republicans couldn’t get elected back into the White House so once the liberals gained control over the White House and Congress and would give those that played along the Stimulus money?

    Honesty, I believe these lying swine in Congress and specifically Mrs. Pelosi; Reid is too dumb to pull it off. Where are the headquarters of AIG, Morgan Stanley and all the others? I was able to locate what Oregon Company donated or gave money to their US Senators. Oregon tends to be Democratic. I located the name of the Senator and was able to pull up what Corporation donated to his campaign for re-election. Since I don’t know what I’m looking at I’m not sure what the data says. If there is anyone who understands investment, transactions, income and assets, Top 5 Contributors, Campaign Cmte and the Top 5 Industries. Are these funds their own personal funds or what companies contributed to their campaigns? What goes into their PAC and what goes to their campaign committee? If anyone wants to look at what I found go to OpenSecrets. org. When I went into Barack Obama’s profile there’s something strange there. If I am reading it correctly.

    Source of Funds Barack Obama
    Individual contributions $656,357,572 88%
    PAC contributions $1,830 0%
    Candidate self-financing $0 0%
    Federal Funds $0 0%
    Other $88,626,223 12%

    They rated him as incomplete/no disclosure. So, he has withheld disclosure of those who donated for his run for President and received close to over 745 million. Can someone do that? It looks that John McCain was more forthcoming. But again I don’t understand what I’m looking at.

    I think this chart is the donor one and how much they donated. It states… This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate; rather the money came from the organization’s PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

    University of California $1,564,490
    Goldman Sachs $994,795
    Harvard University $854,017
    Microsoft Corp $833,617
    Google Inc $803,436
    Citigroup Inc $699,790
    JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
    Time Warner $589,334
    Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
    Stanford University $586,557
    National Amusements Inc $550,683
    UBS AG $543,219
    Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
    Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
    IBM Corp $527,572
    Columbia University $526,802
    Morgan Stanley $514,881
    General Electric $499,130
    Latham & Watkins $493,835
    US Government $491,420

    It’s interesting to see so many Stimulus recipients and bailout buddies on the list, but of course that has no meaning. To be fair McCain has his share of Stimulus recipients and bailout buddies but he also received a lot of donations from well known Lobbyist groups. If you click on the link it pulls up the company profile and who got what. “Employees” donated 61% to the Democrats, Republicans got .39%. Also interesting is looking at the two political parties. The Democrat has already over spent this year and is 27.9 million in debt whereas the Republicans are 9.9 million in debt.

    If someone understands of this gobbley-gook maybe they could simply it.

  40. About all this media attention focusing on Obama’s gaze upon a 16-year-old female’s gluteus maximi: nonsense! Now, if there was a picture/video of the President’s picking his nose–that would REALLY prove he is not–read the last two words very quickly–God! (Despite what his current belief is about that subject.)

    By the way, someone published a book with photos of very famous people picking their nose–including Queen Elizabeth II!

    Also, I believe God does not leave any excess material in His body, which means that He does not sneeze, urinate or defecate!

  41. Obama – he’s talking about America or Africa?Cant tell the difference. Sounds to me like the same bullshit, just a different place. Is this guy clueless or what?

    “No business wants to invest in a place where the government skims 20 percent off the top, or the head of the Port Authority is corrupt. No person wants to live in a society where the rule of law gives way to the rule of brutality and bribery.

    “That is not democracy, that is tyranny, even if occasionally you sprinkle an election in there,” he said, “and now is the time for that style of governance to end.”

    Amen Brother Barack! Its time for your style of government to end. We just may need to take to the streets with pitchforks and torches soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s