The Bolshevik Barnstormer is at it again. Yesterday, he was off to Montana pitching his socialist snake oil to yet another crowd of antiseptically scrubbed lemmings.. Obama winged his way to Montana, coincidentally the home state of Max Baucus, the unfortunate liberal who chose the short straw and was left with the formidable task of turning the Obama health scare socialist “takeover” into a warm and fuzzy “overhaul”..
According to the New York Times, (Obama Says Insurers Are Trying To Block Change” 08/15/09) the paranoid progressive believes that insurance companies are out to get him.. The Party that still wets the bed over the “Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” can’t possibly imagine that ANYONE would disagree with their Solomonic perspicacity..
“In some cases what we’ve seen is also funding in opposition by some other insurance companies to any kind of reform proposals..” Here again we are witnesses to the illness that is invariably spawned by those who have devoured the liberal Eucharist. In twenty-two words, Obama has placed the leftist’s psychosis upon the table for dissection. Lets scrub up and begin the operation..
“In some cases..” Please name these “cases”. Please name just ONE case.. This portion of the puffery sounds as if the liberals have some kind of specific “proof” or “evidence” to support their allegations. The need for specifics with the left is irrelevant because their minions have been hypnotized as “true believers”. Their leaders are therefore dumbfounded when everyone else who isn’t anesthetized doesn’t just reflexively buy into their bunk without at least flinching.
“..funding in opposition by some other insurance companies..” Now his asinine and amorphous allegation sounds even more ominous, therefore it is imperative at this point that Obama be specific about the culprits. He apparently at least knows that this “funding” is coming from “some other insurance companies”, so why not NAME THEM? Obama did name one company that has “been constructive” in this pogrom, so why not name all of these companies guilty of liberal apostasy? Obama named Aetna as the “constructive” company. What a stunning surprise it is to learn that Aetna’s chief executive Ronald A. Williams, is “a major Obama supporter..”
When the left stumbles into the “problem” of not having anything remotely resembling “proof” or “evidence”, they then run holding their skirts up toward the nurturing nonsense of “conspiracy theories”. There is always a dark and sinister “plot” by person or persons unknown when the liberals are “out there” (literally..) trying to “do good.” Their individual “God” complex doesn’t allow them the sense to comprehend that everyone with a measurable IQ will disagree with their inherent intrusiveness. They have occupied their own delusional moral high ground within their minds for so long that they are always stunned to learn that everyone else can’t see their capes and thrones, let alone their sanctimonious halos..
“..to any kind of reform proposals.” “Any kind”, or is the problem more along the lines that they don’t agree with OBAMA’S proposal? If you disagree with the left, it won’t take them long to unearth all kinds of fictitious hobgoblins and pixies that have been perilously placed in the progressive path by the dissenters, real or imaginary, even though the intellectual wizards of the left can’t name a single conspirator.. Note the plural usage, “reform proposals”. Have the liberals floated any “reform proposals”, other than the Obama nightmare package that Obama and his minions keep trying to resuscitate? If they have, could they please NAME THEM??
“Obama the Whiney” continually refers to the “unsubstantiated claims” surrounding his bogus bill. I find the “unsubstantiated claims” surrounding this “bill” to be the ones emanating from His Eminence.. Here are just a few of these gems: “we aren’t going to pull the plug on grandma” or the “claim” that this bill will not add to his already impressive budget deficit or that he will not raise taxes, “not one dime”, on families earning less than $250,000..
The paranoia that has invaded the liberal leader has now caused him to lash out at his BFF’s in the “impartial” media. It is easy to understand the Obama gullibility on this point. The media have showered him with so much “historic” praise for so long, he began to believe his own press, which with a typically egomaniacal liberal isn’t the hardest thing in the world to do.. “TV loves a ruckus. What you haven’t seen on TV and what makes me proud are the many constructive meetings going on all over the country..” Is he now “proud of his country for the first time” in his life? I would imagine that he is “proud” of these liberally orchestrated communist cake walks and socialist square dances like the one he was attending in Montana..
The BIGGEST problem from Obama’s perspective is not why the media is covering the discontent, it is why the discontent is there in the first place.
The liberals can’t see the forest for the trees. Back in the halcyon days, the liberals would take their “discontent” straight to Def Con 5. They would immediately assemble with their misspelled placards and posters, they would instinctively gather to throw bottles, scream and yell while making a complete nuisance out of themselves for the benefit of the “news” crews who were always conveniently “on location” whenever the liberals would “protest”. Since the left disagreed with “the system”, “protest” was cool, man..
Now “the opposition” is becoming verbal about their “discontent”. Now the liberals are running “the system”. (Into the ground, I might add..) The liberals don’t understand anyone or anything outside of their intellectual cesspool. It takes quite a lot for the “average Joe” to get up and act “like a liberal”. By ignoring the questions and requests of the majority, the constituents, they now feel as though they have no other way for their voices to be heard. Is there media coverage because the media themselves, as liberal fellow travelers, don’t understand how the leftists who preach the virtues of “free speech” are doing everything in their power to deny that right to those who disagree? The left definitely understands that the “violence” wasn’t introduced to the “dissent of the masses” until the liberals “organized” their union friends who then spontaneously began to appear at these “dog and phony shows”.
The liberals have a congenital ability to lie without hesitation. The Obama administration is the perfect example of this. However, their biggest weakness is their lack of control. Had the liberals just gone about all of this socialist upheaval in a more methodical fashion, those who are “dissenting” would have never known. It takes a lot to get the moderates and conservatives to “act” on the acts of the liberal oligarchs and this group certainly can say that their poison has been administered in epic proportions..
John Podesta, psychotic liberal head of the “Center for American Progress” (which is as inappropriately named as the “Howard Dean School of Logical Liberal Thought”..) said that dissenters are out to “destroy his (Obama’s) presidency..” I would hope that Podesta is more than aware that no one is doing a better job of that than Obama himself..
Obama, ever the stand up comedian, started off this little gathering in Montana by saying, “Montana has bears, moose and elk, and in Washington you mostly have bull..” Randy Rathie, an attendee at the “event” later told CNN, “Now he has given me his word, personally, that he is not going to raise my taxes..” Sir, when it comes to the amount “bull” that comes from Obama, the amount “bull” that he has already unleashed and that which has yet to unleash, you are not even getting the tail..