The news just keeps getting worse for the Obama oligarchs.. Which means that the news just keeps getting better for America.
What a wonderful few days it has been. Kathleen Sebelius decide to try out her “John Kerry autographed model Flip-Flops” as she and Obama got into a hilarious version of “He said, she said” in public over his “public option” pogrom.. This is the result of trying to govern based upon the progressive popularity polls of months past combined with “Doctor Barack’s Bolshevik Bulimia” plan of gorging the nation with his “trans fatty fascism”. He and his zombies have grossly underestimated the nation’s ability to keep their progressive poisons down..
Next we have Barney “Thufferin’ Thucatash” Frank, showering the audience with socialist saliva in Dartmouth Massachusetts. Here Obama thought that trotting (or prancing) out one of the uber-liberal demigods in front of the hometown Massachusetts crowd might elicit some sound bites fit for the liberal media’s consumption. Wrong again..
Barney was thimply flabbergasted by the crowd. “I thought you were thoughtful people here to have a conversation..” (“Rep. Frank, Critics Face Off At Town Hall Event” FoxNews) Within the liberal lexicon, a “thoughtful conversation” involves the liberals telling you what is best for you at which point you are to follow their orders without any semblance of discord or disagreement. The liberals have always been so “thoughtful” and respectful when they have disagreed in the past. What about the “Democratic Duchess of Deceit” and her statement from 2003, “I’m a fan of disrupters”? Some in the Dartmouth crowd called Frank “liar” which is nearly as obvious as calling him “poofter”, “light in the loafers” or “Democrat”..
The liberals have all forgotten the previous months and their “100 day/yard dash” to unbridled socialism and the affects of the Obama lunacy upon the public. They can’t draw the conclusion that it is the equivalent of the Nathan’s Hot Dog eating contest at Coney Island upon the digestive tract of its participants.. The next stop will be to have the Secretary of State BILL (not Hill) Clinton, back out from the Bolshevik bullpen for yet another encore relief performance as he will tour the nation heroically exposing himself (literally and figuratively..) while singing the socialist sonnet for his “historic” headmaster.. The left is desperately flailing to find a liberal, any liberal, that won’t be pelted with spitballs and raspberries while trying to “sell” the “Mengele/Kevorkian Health Care Debacle of 2009”. Good luck with that..
Again it seems that the nonsensical nitwits will have to go back to the Demokratic drawing board which means that it is time to figure out how to lie to the public more efficiently.. The story from the Wall Street Journal says it all, “White House Rethinks How It Will Sell Health Overhaul”. Here is the liberal libel front and center for the world to see.
From the article, “a democratic strategist said, ‘If you are going to sell something as big and monumental and transformative as health care, you cannot get small with it. You’ve got to be larger’”. The left is acting as though they are “selling” us a car or a refrigerator, not “selling” us down the river.
This “being large” is exactly what they WANTED to do and it was exactly what they WERE doing until they were finally called out on it. It was all about the “hurry up and sign it, no one was supposed to read it, just pass it now” plan. It doesn’t get much “larger” than that. Then a funny thing happened. The PUBLIC decided to get “small” with it, not the liberal elitists.
We read that the liberals are “trying to regain control of the health care debate” and that Obama will “shift his pitch in September”. This is not a “pitch”, it is the trillion dollar debacle that is the fifth “number one priority” of the Illinois interloper. Now Obama wants to emphasize the “moral imperative”. The liberals talking about the “moral” imperative is almost as funny as Rosie O’Donnell seriously discussing pulchritude..
We read that “the rethinking comes amid a struggle by the White House to clarify its view on a public insurance plan..” Please keep in mind the theory of “liberal lexical inversion”. The liberals “clarify” things by making things vastly more obtuse. The liberals “clarify” things by becoming more polysyllabic, using a full page to “say” what they could in less than a sentence. Lets go back to Bath house Barney’s little town hall..
When asked for “clarifications”, Barney wanted to know “on what planet do you spend most of your time?” He then proceeded to expound upon the Obama LIES by claiming that “some of the money” to pay for the Obama health scare would come from “a tax hike on people making more than $325,000 a year..” It would appear that Barney is allowing for the Obama inflation to be factored in because Obama says that that figure is $250,000.. Please keep in mind the Obama administrations lack of mathematical specificity based upon all of their tax returns.. Again, when the liberals tell you they want to “clarify” they aim to obfuscate. “Clarify” to a liberal means to “divert”.
Now the soft dirty underbelly of liberalism is beginning to come down from their high and now THEY are getting verbal about what THEY want Obama to do. After all, it was their repetitive votes that put him in this “historic” position in the first place. “The president is expected to present a more emotional appeal during a conference call Wednesday with liberal religious groups”.. The word is out, there will be no seances, Wiccan covans or any other progressive pagan parade or ceremony today as Obama will be making “a more emotional appeal”..
The best way to “clarify” your position is to become all “emotional” about it. Nothing clears the air like a good old fashion “cry”, so it sounds like we may be hearing about Obama’s grandma again.. The left has based their actions upon emotion versus logic from time immemorial so this tacky tack is long overdue. Even so, “the new strategy envisions speeches rather than informal town-hall meetings”.. There you have it, according to the liberals, the best way to “listen” to the constituents is to “talk at them” in such a way that no one can respond.. No one can gather outside of a “conference call” to at least try to voice what was their former constitutional right of free speech.. Note to self, the liberals believe that the First Amendment only applies to those that “think correctly”..
Could you logically say that those who disagree with Obama have seen the “emotional” build up in their response swell due to the stunning lack of recognition of their viewpoints by the liberal leader? Possibly if he had not callously disregarded the vast majority of citizens since he assumed the totalitarian throne, there may not have been any need for their “emotion” at these town hall meetings. Obama’s “emotional appeal” will be acceptable, the citizens “emotional appeal” for common sense, which stems from being slighted by the disinterested Demokrat, is unacceptable..
“Obama has come under criticism from supporters who say that the president has been mired in the details of insurance regulation, rather than promoting the lofty themes that got him elected.” The only thing that the left is “mired” in is “the Russian Revolution circa 2009”. The left has been purposely avoiding the “details”, details that they weren’t going to even discuss with anyone until the wit hit the fan. “Lofty themes” are the liberal lies that everyone suffered through during his ridiculous shampaign.
The left seems so far in denial that they may never be extricated. “White House officials say the massage on improving health care is getting through.” Were they not addicted to their own stupidity they would drop the word “improving” because the “message on health care is getting through” whether they want to hear it or not..
Pollster William McInturff, in noting the decided and devastating drop in the Obama polling numbers, not only over the health care scam but also relative to his imploding administration said “something is wrong with the Obama health-care effort..” The glaring understatement aside, shouldn’t McInturff’s statement have started with “everything” instead of “something”?