Lost between the liberal cracks of deceit and diversion last week was the revelation that the Obama administration will be raising the ten year deficit outlook from their admitted seven trillion dollar total to nearly ten trillion dollars.. The mathematical dynamics and technicalities that have always illuded the Obama liberals right around tax time invariably confuses them when it comes to accepting the damage that they have done to the nation with their Marxist meddling.
The oily and evasive liberals are hard to pin down when it comes to their numerical insufficiencies. Back in April of this year, Depressed Secretary Robert “Chuckles” Gibbs said that, “Only in Washington, D.C. is one hundred million (dollars) not a lot of money. It is where I come from. It is where I grew up..” That being the case, where does goofy Gibbs stand on a monetary difference of at least two TRILLION dollars? (That’s just the difference between the perpetually spiraling Obama deficits, that’s not counting the TWENTY times larger deficit of Obama versus Bush..) Such fiscal discrepancies should have Assachusetts Representative Barney Frank asking Gibbs, “On what planet do you spend most of your time?”
Just a short time ago, the licentious liberals used to claim that one of the biggest problems that George Bush had was that he would not admit that he was wrong. Where would Obama fit into that paradigm with his “we inherited this mess” mantra whenever he and his acolytes are called to task for their ample failings, fascist flailings and their mathematical miscalculations?
Here is the latest example of this progressive puling pattern. According to the Reuters article, “Obama to raise 10-year deficit to $9 trillion”, “the new forecasts are based on new data that reflect how severe the economic downturn was in the late fall of last year and the winter of this year..” Mind you, this “statement” came from “the administration official who is familiar with the budget session review that is slated to be released next week..” Nineteen words wasted when this person’s name would do.. There is still so much anonymity within this “transparent” administration..
Lets suppose just to quiet the liberal zombies, that the previous typically anonymous statement is true, which is nothing more than just another wordier version of “we inherited this mess” as Obama and the excuse machine likes to say. I have a few points that I would like to bring up..
Firstly, as everyone knows, the liberals are all geniuses of the highest caliber. Their intellectual insight and mental power is far superior to that of other mortal beings. With such perspicacity always at the ready, why haven’t they done something to actually cure this problem other than to say that they “inherited” it? (Actually, wouldn’t it be a refreshing “change” for them to admit that they have significantly worsened the problem?)
Secondly, since the left is as averse to honesty as they are to hygiene, would it be in bad taste to point out to them that they have “inherited” this problem from themselves? They have “inherited” this from years of a liberally controlled House and Senate, the faux “economy” of Clinton and the meddling of Bathhouse Barney..
The same wizards who now have had to RAISE their ten year deficit projection will now “lower its deficit forecast for this fiscal year to 1.58 trillion from 1.84 trillion..” The same simpletons who are seeding the fiscal clouds with imaginary numbers are now telling us that there is a socialist silver lining right around the corner.. Rules to live by: you wouldn’t have left your daughter with the last liberal to invade the Oval Office, this time around I wouldn’t advise you to leave your checkbook or credit cards near the White House..
Reality isn’t of consequence to the liberals. “Obama, who has promised to halve the deficit by the end of his four-year term and likes to remind constituents he inherited a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit..” Again, lets assume that the liberal is correct in this statement that he so often repeats. How can he explain away his personal works that have taken that deficit and made it nearly ten times bigger?
When he says that he will “halve” the deficit, will that be the “half” of the Bush deficit or “half” of HIS OWN? If the Obama “creative mathematicians” amazingly “discover” that the deficit is somehow half a trillion dollars smaller, will he claim that he has “halved the Bush deficit” even though HIS total deficit is still at least five times larger than his predecessor’s? Those who swoon as they inhale the Obama communist cologne will not be concerned with these “inconvenient truths”..
“Many economists think it unlikely the government can curtail spending which means taxes would have to go up..” A liberal raising taxes? Who has ever heard of such a thing.. Brace yourselves, the “fog and phony” show will again be gussied up and perfumed for the gullible. Here we have the political equivalent of a television series “re-run” which was first made famous by the First Philanderer. At that time, the ceiling of “$200,000 a year” quickly fell to “140,000”, then to”115,000″, then to “40,000”.. These lies are being replicated by Obama LIE that he will “not raise taxes on Americans making less than $250,000 a year”, at which time the liberal “creative counting” will again come into play..
The Bush deficits, nearly ten times smaller than the Obama deficits, used to bring down howls of derision from the unwashed asses of the left. How about just a few choice quotes from Obama hack Rahm Emanuel relative to the deficits of the previous administration..
“Bush squandered a $236 billion dollar surplus, ran up record deficits and added nearly $4 trillion to the national debt. Mr. President, we will be forever in your debt..” (“Countdown to Crawford” latimes 06/28/2008) “The deficit is going to be a symbol of their credibility problem, and the budget is going to be the document we use..” (“Democrats will use deficits to attack Bush, GOP credibility” USAToday 02/21/2004) Shouldn’t Rahm have a better understanding of his own history and complicity in these crimes since he was not only a member of the House Budget Committee but he was also a “political aide” to Clinton and now he is the Chief of Staff to Obama?
Nancy Pelosi called the Bush budget and deficit “a hoax on the American people”. (“Congressional Democrats Criticize Bush Budget” VOANews 02/07/2005) As one of the 2009 “perpi-traitors” of “a hoax on the American people” that is TEN TIMES LARGER, where do you place yourself in this “Hall of Shame”, Madame Speaker?
When confronted by the stark realities of the uprisings that were taking place at the town hall forums that were supposed to grease the rails for the Obama “takeover” of health care, Democratic doppelganger Harry Reid held up some plastic grass and said, “I want you to see what Astroturf is.. This is not grassroots..” When it comes to the bogus Bolshevik, Obama and his artificial reality, I find it to be nothing more than “Afroturf”..