Since the aroma surrounding the heady days of the Obama beatification has wafted off into the ozone, the liberals have had to change their tactics relative to whatever the particular propaganda in question happens to be. Initially, the liberals needed only one “scare tactic” per “takeover”. After the “health scare” debacle, the liberals have concluded that they need to ramp up the rhetoric with possibly three or more lachrymose lies per lunacy.. Introducing: the soon to be epidemic du jour, the “new and improved” fallacy of “population growth”, co-starring “global warming”! and “ecological overload”! With the left, it is actually an “overload” of illogic and sophistry..
The liberal’s idea of “science” for the last sixty years or so, has been the nothing more than yelling “fire!” in a crowded theater. Hearing that word at 110 decibels, no one has the time to look at or for, the “supportive evidence”. There is no time to see if you smell smoke, there is no time to see if there are flames coming from under the doors, just take our word for it and RUN!! They have wanted to create a stampeded based upon fear, not upon evidence. Since this theory has failed to create the necessary genuflection to the leftist’s ideology, the next step in this demented dance is to start stacking “scare tactics”, one upon the other..
In “Population growth driving climate change, poverty, experts” (Breitbart) we read that “unchecked population growth is speeding climate change, damaging life-nurturing ecosystems and dooming many countries to poverty..” Keep in mind that this isn’t the first time that we have heard the core argument raised, but this is the first time that it has been colored with the kooky Crayons of climate change, ecosystems AND poverty..
It is possible to chart the liberal’s population obsession back to the late 1700’s to a British writer named Thomas Malthus. Malthus’ “work” (“guesses” actually.. and very poor guesses at that..) has been the fulcrum for many liberal evolutionary biologists, most notably Darwin, and their “theories” of “natural selection.” To the rest of the liberals without the typically overeducated leftist’s “scientific indoctrination”, the voltage of the overtones of the impending “epidemic” were the most powerful of aphrodisiacs. “Proof” is irrelevant to the true believers, volume and repetition are all that is necessary..
Totalitarian tag teaming is now the rage. It may be alright to ignore the “epidemic” of population growth, but only a callous capitalist cad could “ignore” the evidence of the population explosion’s influence upon global warming, energy supplies and environmental pollution.. Take the fatalistic words of “professor” Roger Short for example. “The inexorable increase in human numbers is exhausting conventional energy supplies, accelerating environmental pollution and global warming and providing an increased number of failed states where civil unrest prevails..” Try to find ANY of the liberal pet projects that Short forgot to mention within his screed. According to the “professor”, if we end the population explosion, through a contiguous causation similar to a domino principle, every liberal “problem” would simply go away leaving the numbskull Nirvana that every liberal control freak dreams of between hits from their wizard bong..
If the liberals aren’t merely piling on when it comes to their “scare tactics”, they will just adjust their nonsense by 180 degrees. In the seventies, with their “dire warnings” ever at the ready position, the liberals puled about the “impending Ice Age.” All sorts of “evidence” (not..) was presented with the inappropriate amount of both amplification and bawling added and their conclusions (06/24/1974 Time Magazine) were that soon the world would be again engulfed in ice..
At least back then, “Man, too may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend..” The liberals have since refined their “arguments”. The “somewhat” element has disappeared like the dinosaurs and now “man” (read: capitalism) is totally responsible. Please make note of yet another refinement within this “argument” from the seventies, “dust and other particles released into the atmosphere as a result of farming and fuel burning..” Farming has been dropped from the moronic mix. Now the “cap and trade” socialism type of “argument” based upon the fuel consumption of SOME people is the culprit. For example, Obama is polluting the environment not only with his traipsing about in Air Farce One but with the carcinogenic compost of his words as well and no one on the left seems to mind..
The “specialists” in everything from environmental science, economics and demography from the Royal Academy in Britain all spoke darkly of “voluntary family programs and easy access to contraceptives. “Much more emphasis need to be given to meeting the need for family planning-all women should be protected from unintended childbirth..” “Unintended”? All of this is nothing more than the Margaret Sanger song of “negative eugenics” or if you would prefer another term that more aptly describes the liberal Mengeles, “scientific racism”.
From their polluted perspectives, their “concern” for the planet’s population should be remedied through “family-planning” (abortion) and “contraception”. If not well, things will become “unsustainable”, etc., etc.. “Unchecked population growth is speeding climate change, damaging life-nurturing ecosystems and dooming many countries to poverty..” Everyone scrub up an lets begin the dissection..
“Climate change”. Theory, no evidence. Who is the most popular “scientist” hawking the globaloney warming gibberish? Al Gore. Their most famous scientist is a failed politician.. “Dooming many countries to poverty..” These “countries” might be doomed to poverty due to the demonic despots who lord over the land and its bounty. These “countries” may be doomed to poverty due to the obscene oligarchs and the communist cliques sitting upon their golden thrones.. Surely the liberals wouldn’t want to see these fellow travelers overthrown for the good of the citizens of these impoverished nations, would they?
The core liberal arguments are so weak that it has become necessary to use several of them in order to try to make one of them stick. However, each of these spindly legs hasn’t the strength to sufficiently aid the other. According to the “professors”, climate change is being sped by population growth. Obama sat upon his own throne at the U.N. just yesterday after banging out yet another out of tune number straight from the childish “climate change” songbook. Czech President Vaclav Klaus called the Obama U.N. display, “Sad, frustrating, propagandistic and undignified.” When the liberals start yelling “fire!”, block the exits with common sense and evidence..
Obama and the liberal caliphate are, in their own special way trying to make a “New World Order” that conforms to their perverted perspectives. All that they are actually creating is a New World Odor, altered over time in order to fit their noxious needs and they creating more pollution than they are alleviating..