Looking Back

Two days ago Obama was desperately preaching to the communist choir in Massachusetts on behalf of yet another lifeless Massachusetts liberal whom they had hoped would be taking over for yet another lifeless Massachusetts liberal and his ridiculous “legacy”.. (AKA; “status quo”) I find it to be a genetic miracle generations in the making that the feet of the liberal genus seems to fit so perfectly into their mouths.. Due to their proclivity for placing said extremities into said orifices, the physical pain to them is nowhere near as pronounced as the political pain of their words. When the liberals speak, it is important to look back through the minefield of their words and deeds from the past..

As Obama was clucking away, lost within the aromatic ambiance and simultaneously hypnotized by the noxious fumes emanating from his own words, he said, “Her opponent’s got Wall Streets back.. Bankers don’t need another vote in the United States Senate. They’ve got plenty. Where’s yours?” The humor that always comes from the words of the typical liberal are almost always interlarded with the patented “progressive projection” or the liberal thought that “a good offense is better than a good defense”..

As is always the case, the left must portray themselves as the “protectors of the ‘little guy’”. More often than not, the “little guy” is actually the “BIG GUY”, someone that when they are begging for votes PRIOR to an election is portrayed as the virulent enemy of the nation and of the liberal special interests.. AFTER the votes (real or imagined) are counted, the interests of the interests take precedence over the whims and concerns of the individual voter that put the liberal into office. Once the lofty liberal is in office, the roars of the crowd are but a whisper and the whispers of the “big guys” become a roar..

There has always been an uncomfortable umbilicus between “Big Guy” Goldman Sachs and the federal government. Under the moderate Bush, former Goldman CEO Henry Paulson ran Treasury. Former Goldman boss Robert Rubin ran Treasury under the liberal Clinton. Obama ran interference for former Goldman boss Jon Corzine before he lost his comfy seats in both the U.S. Senate and as the governor of New Jersey. Another Goldman former employee/lobbyist Mark Patterson, is Chief of Staff to Obama Treasury nutbag “Turbo” Tim Geithner.

The Obama administration has gone over and above to take care of Goldman relative to all of the TARP and other assorted “bailouts”. While breaking yet another campaign “promise” of ending the “influence of lobbyists in his administration” with Patterson, according to the liberal Wikipedia, “During 2008 Goldman Sachs came under criticism for an apparent revolving-door relationship in which its employees and consultants have moved in and out of powerful US Government positions, where there may exist a potential for a conflict of interest..” This “criticism” has apparently died on the vine since a liberal Democrat, protector of the “little guy” is now in Washington..

The limousine liberals do not “hate” money. They hate the idea that anyone other than their “Big Guy” friends and associates has any. Those who effective chew the communist cud in public are “speaking to power” and their billions therefore have a “progressive protection” about them. Liberal spokesweasels like Bono or George Clooney have wealth far beyond the reach of what is usually cast as the “evil capitalist investor” or the CEO of the average business but their failure to toe the liberal line casts them immediately as the “enemy”. The detail-less liberals cast the enemy as “evil capitalist investors” in order to sufficiently rankle their lowest class which survives on the meat and potatoes of “class separatism”. If they were forced to detail who these “evil capitalists” are, they would have to step on the toes of those that they have TARPed and “bailed” out..

With class separatism as their guide, when the “bailouts” were being bellowed for, the perfect opportunity for the liberal deconstructionists to level their wrecking ball at the “Big Guys” was in place. Lehman Brothers (1850-2008) was allowed to crumble but CIT, a company ten times smaller than Lehman was “bailed out”. If Goldman was “too big to fail”, what was Lehman? The question therefore becomes exactly how many liberal politicians and their “friends” were deeply invested in CIT at the time that it was going to collapse?

Obama has bailed out the “evil capitalists” from Lehman, CIT, Fannie and Freddie for a reason. “Her opponent’s got Wall Streets back.. Bankers don’t need another vote in the United States Senate. They’ve got plenty. Where’s yours?” The “bankers” and “Wall Street” could have all one hundred of the votes in the Senate and that wouldn’t matter anywhere near as much as the fact that they have the vote of Barack Hussein Obama.

In “A Tale of Two Bailouts” (online dot wsj dot com 07/16/2009) said, “Goldman’s traders profited in the second quarter from taking advantage of spreads left wide by the disappearance of some competitors (Lehman, Bear Sterns) and the risk aversion of others (Morgan Stanley).. One policy response to the incentives created by last fall’s bailout is simply to restrict the proprietary trading done by the subsidiaries of bank holding companies that enjoy both FDIC deposit insurance and an implicit government subsidy on their cost of capital. That is what Paul Volcker proposed, only to be overruled by Tim Geithner and Larry Summers..” Just one more time for emphasis, “”Her opponent’s got Wall Streets back.. Bankers don’t need another vote in the United States Senate. They’ve got plenty. Where’s yours?”

The liberal ruse of being the progressive protector of the “little guy” has gone on long enough. When an Obama asks, “Where’s yours?” in relation to a vote in the Senate, he is just hoodwinking the easily hoodwinked. The liberal base just wants to be “bought off” or “bailed out” with the monies taken from their superiors. All of this heady talk of “Wall Street” and the “Bankers” is just for show. The liberal base has no knowledge or concern with any of that, they just want a “raise” properly redistributed from the hard work of others..

These liberal images and shibboleths of “enemies” just paints a large and amorphous image of a faceless and nameless bugaboo that needs to be vanquished by their liberal leaders.. The proletarians aren’t concerned whether the liberal leaders do any of the “vanquishing” that they have promised, they just want to be lovingly told that they will and they will “believe”..

As Obama continues to fill the rarified air with the progressive pettifoggerie of populist promises perfumed for the noses and tuned for the ears of the imbecilic, the “legacy” of the Teddy’s will continue (only in the black hearts and the empty minds of the leftists as they LOST a seat held for far too long by the uber-kooks..) along with the Kerry’s and the Frank’s.. They will all be marching “lockstep” into the abyss, forever tilting at windmills..

Advertisements

42 responses to “Looking Back

  1. Family,

    I knew Brown would win and I said so here..

    Sing it loud and sing it proud..

    “2010: Never give in, never give up and never again!!

    Lets get to work while there is still enough of America left to salvage.

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  2. wow
    he did it in mass
    SOME COMMENTS
    THE SCOTT HEARD ROUND THE WORLD

    BEAM ME UP SCOTTIE

    MIRACLE IN MASS

    UNDERGROUND FOR BROWN

    LARRY YOU CDAN TELL I AM EXCITED

    KILL OBAMACARE NOW

    CAP AND TRADE NEXT

  3. “2010: Never give in, never give up and never again!!

  4. JR,

    Be exicted. You never gave up, excitement is your just reward.

    If any Republican like Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins “flips” on this health care scam, they will be next..

    CPAC is going to rock! I hope that Rush shows up there again.

    Say hi to the Mrs.

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  5. Family,

    What I wouldn’t give to see a record number of hits and comments on both sites tomorrow..

    Lets get to work! That battle cry alone is enough to scare the loafing liberals away..

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  6. Ladies and gentlemen,

    Massachusetts brought the “M” back!!

    Who called it?

    Great work by the Bay State!

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  7. I’m wondering if Chris “doesn’t matter” Matthews is getting a “tingling in his ass” after the Democrats got their bolshevik butts kicked in MA today??

    STTICH!

  8. hmm, 542 “fans” of NLTZ on facebook, but I invited my 1732 friends to join the group…

    STITCH!

    PS – does anyone know, is Michael Jackson still dead??

  9. “Happy Days are here again!” OK, so it’s the Dems’ song – but we can steal it now, can’t we? And why should those libtards get to keep such an American song all to their evil little selves anyway?!!?

  10. Stitch’s comment about inviting a gazillion friends to join NLTZ reminds me to send a similar invitation to my FB pals, too! Onward & upward!!

  11. Arthur Nankervis

    NLTZ family.

    I’m sure there are many who would be worthy of praise and thanks for helping Senator Scott Brown over the line. Following, is a partial list of those worthy of a special thank you:

    President … Barak Hussein Obama: for going to Massachusetts, saying nothing and helping Senate candidate Brown at a crucial time;
    Slick … William Jefferson Clinton … dittos as above, plus his “all about me” style,
    David Richmond Gergen … for setting up the perfect response from Senate candidate Brown on just whose ‘Senate Seat’ he was running for;
    Martha Coakley … for being the perfect Democrat opponent for Senate candidate Brown to run against: … cold, clammy, rapid heartbeat and shallow breathing – almost dead;
    Keith Theodore Olbermann … for being nasty as always and who might just find himself being a respondent in a lawsuit “Watch your fingers Keith’ … Clang!; and
    Most Democrat lawmakers and their partners in crime … the Main Stream Media who assisted greatly with their vociferous, well timed comments which alienated those who were undecided at that time.

    The list is endless really, and I’m sure that family members could think up a more appropriate cast of characters.

    Arthur

  12. According to Nasty Nancy, Brown’s victory is insignificant – she and dirty Harry will get their healthscare passed !

    Now we will see just how ‘stupidly’ they will act . Could there be another big “bribery” deal in the works for some spineless legislator? Or, is there yet another way that these libs can defie our Constitution ? Stay tuned.

  13. get (or print) a Brown poster and send it to a Democrat.
    No words, just the poster.

    STITCH!

    unless that Demo is up for re-election in 2010, then right on the back of the poster, “You’re Next”.

  14. It was like the Super Bowl yesterday. Like Rush said “Today is the first official day of saving the United States.” The M is back Larry. Here are some highlights of MSNBC the night of the victory.

    “The same guy runs over and over and every once in a while a nerd comes along and wins,” thrill up my leg Matthews.

    “I think he ran a dirty campaign” and “He’s a liar he says he wants to cut taxes and reduce the deficit but, he’s against healthcare. Healthcare reduces taxes and the deficit.” That came from the handsome Ray Maddow. From now on when a Republican wins I’m flipping on MSNBC for comic relief. My friend and I were watching MSNBC. I think with just the two of they had a 200 percent jump in ratings.

  15. I was just reading in THE WHISLTE BLOWER how the left creates and uses crisis for their gain and it was very eye opening and informative. I can see much clearer today and reading your column today is another joy. Thanks Larry!

  16. I found this online and had to share it!!!

    see more Epic Fails

  17. Family,

    Check out:

    http://noleftturnztotd.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/how-could-this-happen/

    Hot off of the TOTD presses.

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  18. Friend on another conservative website has asked me to spread the below letter and hope you do the same. The man is a retired Constitutional lawyer and instructor/professor from law school in Texas.

    Here it goes:

    The Truth About the Health Care Bills – Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

    Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

    To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

    The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government..

    However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

    The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

    The irony is that the Congress doesn’t have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

    This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

    If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However, that doesn’t work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

    So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn’t stop there though.

    The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

    The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

    I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to “be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution.” If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

    For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

    Michael Connelly
    Retired attorney,
    Constitutional Law Instructor
    Carrollton , Texas

  19. Enjoy you site, subscribe to it, I’m think the term you were looking for was an cranial anal extraction.
    Not likely to happen with the far left, but certainly with the moderate Dems. Jim

  20. Scott Brown’s win yesterday is the realization of one of the great recent political ironies. Ted Kennedy, rather than retiring from the Senate in 2008 when he was diagnosed, stayed in to fight for his beloved health care reform. Had he retired in 2008, surely a Democrat would have been elected to fill his seat, given the mood of the electorate then, and we would not have cause to celebrate today. But, by staying in to the bitter end, he allowed for the public to get a sense of this health care deform, which led to what happened last night. Classic.

  21. tccesq,

    Spot on.

    Another imbecile in light of recent “happenings” would be Arlen “the ferret” Specter.

    His ability to see into the future shall spell his demise as well.. Democrat Specter is done.

    Teee heee..

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  22. I believe the message from Mass. is quite simple: “Progressives beware”. Too bad Harry Reid is too dense to understand this simple truth. We’re not mad at the bankers, we’re mad at the liberal loons whom have been trying to steal our country from us.

    However, we must understand that while we might stop Cap and Tax and Obamacare here, the Progressives will find other ways to ram it through anyway. We must understand, as Micheal Moore told the world, the Progressives are prepared to devour the Democrat party if that is what must be done to achieve their ends. They’ve been at this for nearly one hundred years, since the reign of President Wilson, they are nothing if not patient.

  23. tccesq –
    “His hands worketh in mysterious ways…”
    Mine on the other hand are fairly predictable….
    🙂

    What other event could have driven us off our couches and out into the public square more than this fight to preserve our very nation?
    The Republic is in the balance, and we few, have become many, indeed are now a torrent, and we see with our own eyes that no weapon formed against us, indeed no political machine, will prosper.
    There is a hand, a wind, a Spirit, that is guiding every single word, every single candidate, and every single vote.
    A party lost power, but a nation stood up.
    And nothing, on this earth, can stop us now.
    The world is on notice…
    …The Americans are Coming.

    STITCH!

  24. Family,

    I just can’t stop.. Neither can Obama.

    https://noleftturnz.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/moving-forward-2/#comment-11070

    It’s a hot one..

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  25. G.,
    How appropriate that Moore would talk about “devouring” the Demokratic Party..

    The words of the “Buffet Buster”..

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  26. I’ve always said the the liberals arrogance, narcissism and ego would take them down. This is but the 4th mistake by Obama and the Democrats. They always think the liberal areas of the Country would stick with them, many realized they are looking out for them, they only care about themselves.

    I’ve been promoting this site on the web, trying to find public email distribution sites to spread the love further. Hope it’s helping.

  27. What I think the Democrats will do, will be to bribe a Republican, one that already said they won’t seek re-election. That little private summit in the Oval Office with Senator George Voinovich, was to see if he’d sign up for the Healthcare Reform and throw his constituents under the bus. Judging by the look on his face, he didn’t cave to the pressure. There was a bit of smugness on his face. It must have felt good to say up your Obama.

    G,

    As for Moore he is just a boil on Obama ass, once its been identified, incised and drained, your good as new.

  28. I saw this in the Ft. Worth (TX) Star-Telegram Jan. 18th newspaper:

    “New York–A man returning from Haiti who set off an alarm that led to the evacuation of a terminal at John F. Kennedy Airport “just walked through the wrong door,” his attorney, Scott Dufault, said Sunday.

    Saturday afternoon’s security breach delayed dozens of flights and caused headaches for hundreds of travelers who had to exit the terminal and wait for hours while police swept through the building.

    The incident is the third evacuation in five months at airports that serve New York City.

    Jules Paul Boulette, 57, was arraigned Sunday on charges including first-degree criminal tampering and third-degree criminal trespass, said Helen Peterson, a spokeswoman for the Queens district attorney.

    He didn’t enter a plea and was released without bail. He faces up to seven years in prison if convicted on the most serious charge.”

    Seven years for going through the wrong door?!!
    But, as Stitch inferred, a Moosleem can carry on board a bomb without so much as a ne’er-do-well!

    Ahh, your friendly neighborhood FAA hard at work! (Can’t smash a grape TOO hard with a sledgehammer, you know.)

  29. Also seen in the same Jan. 18th newspaper in a letter to the editor:

    “I wonder which planet the writers of the Monday column ‘Preparing Texans for climate change’ are living on. It can’t be planet Earth, now experiencing one of the coldest winters on record. The writers believe human activity caused global warming, which now causes all weather extremes. This unproven phenomenon of climate change is the pseudoscience of ‘this is my opinion, so don’t confuse me with the facts.’

    There has been no significant warming of planet Earth since 1998. The opposite is occurring. According to research conducted by Don Easterbrook at Western Washington University, oceans and global temperatures are correlated. He says, “The Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO) cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling.

    Also, CO2 generated by human activity is only .0012 percent of Earth’s atmosphere. Even if man stopped producing CO2, how could this miniscule amount affect weather patterns?

    The writers say computers can predict future weather patterns. Computer modeling is what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change uses to continually tweak its programming. Something unforeseen always occurs that, when added to the variables of input, changes the outcome.The weatherman cannot predict the weather accurately more than two days ahead, so it’s arrogant to claim the ability to predict weather patterns years in the future.

    We must continue to be good stewards of the home God created for us, but we don’t need another bureaucracy making plans for how our children and grandchildren should live.
    Pat Carlson
    Ft. Worth

  30. Seen above a urinal in the college 4th-floor restroom at UTA in Arlington, Texas this afternoon–a sign that said:

    “Do not throw pappars in the uranual.”

    Ahhh, the results of our wonderful NEA (No Education Allowed) at work in the USA!

    And the beat goes on…..

  31. Eileen,

    Thank you!!

    Your continued research, and at this paticular point in time, the comments of retired Constitustional Lawyer Michae Connelly. I will save and use these notations in support of a state senator’s amendment to our state constitution that one shoud not have to pay for citizenship. Also included, and foremost, I will use the points brought out by Mr. Connelly against the liberal Sen. Ben Nelson who sold out his constituents in favor of party-line money. I warned Nelson before. He did not listen. He will never listen again as I will do everythinging within my powers to have him replaced.

  32. The current Healthcare bill is dead but the “Progressives” live on. They will continue their assault on our private lives and continue to live by their dreaded motto “no one shall be able to consume more than they produce” and that takes care of us Seniors. Of course we don’t produce much since we have retired from our productive jobs and therefore we are expendable. That was the purpose of the medicare cuts for those on that medicare they forced on us to begin with. There is a sign in the very liberal town I live in which says “If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem”. It scares me every time I drive past it.

    Vote them all out and let’s get term limits…fast!

  33. Pingback: UK Boosts Terror Alert Level « Dancing Czars

  34. Pingback: ACORN’s Spectacularly Brazen Fraud In California « Dancing Czars

  35. Pingback: Daily Kos Founder Says ‘Teabaggers’ and Republicans ‘Who Hate Brown People’ Will Put the Brakes on Immigration Bill « Dancing Czars

  36. Pingback: To Be Filed Under Birds of a Feather are Predators Together « Dancing Czars

  37. Pingback: Isn’t it particularly interesting to hear Wayne Rathke, founder of ACORN and running SEIU Comment on the 2010 Elections? « Dancing Czars

  38. Pingback: A New Operation and Great Site: Special Ops « Dancing Czars

  39. Pingback: Are you a racist? African Stereotypes: Chicken & Watermelon « Dancing Czars

  40. Pingback: Berry: Obama said “big difference” between ‘10 and ‘94 is “me” « Dancing Czars

  41. Pingback: Pelosi Says Jobs ‘Permeated’ Congressional Actions in Year of 10 Percent Unemployment « Dancing Czars

  42. Pingback: Dancing Czars

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s