Far Reaching Results

Being that the liberal animal must exist within a heightened state of hysteria, today’s headline from Yahoo News seems a bit understated, even by their silly standards.. “Global Warming: Dire Prediction for the Year 3000..” (01/14/2011) You have to admire the tenacity of the liberals, then again relative to the globaloney warming fiction and fables, you would have to admire their “ten-ASS-ity”..

 

Never ones to give up on a good fairy tale, even after almost every one of the so called “scientists” who daringly dangled their weenie within this collectivist campfire has since been singed by the dancing embers of fact, they still trot the same nonsense based upon nothingness out to their more than willing audience.. The easy way around this most recent detour of details is to take your “science” and just claim that the results of your “study” won’t effect the world for another thousand years or so..

Here are a group of “scientists” who cannot tell you with any accuracy what the weather will be like tomorrow but since that have again referred to their “Al Gore Magic Ouija board”, they now know to a certainty what the weather will be like in a another thousand years or so.. The accompanying pie charts and bar graphs may be pretty for the liberals to drool over but since their “scientists” have been caught fudging their “facts”, since they were caught asking others within their progressive pantheon to “overlook” their lack of “facts” and since they haven’t the courage to admit that they are professional liars for profit, it’s nothing more than liberal lunacy..

“Even if humans stop producing excess carbon dioxide in 2100, the lingering effects of global warming could span the next millennia. By the year 3000, global warming could be more than a hot topic..” Using the same “scientific” research as the liberals, I will “predict” that in the year 4976, everything will be adjusting from another Ice Age.. Note the liberal disdain, “even if humans..” Never mind that every volcanic eruption, every hot spring and geyser sends CO2 everywhere.. Maybe the Democratic Deity should stop polluting the precious environment with the all of the flights needed for all of his weekly vacations..

“Using a computer model, researchers looked at two scenarios..” Who programmed this “computer model”? If the programmer had say, an “agenda”, and he or she programmed the software to respond in a particular way, would anyone in their right mind call the results “valid” or even “scientific”? The answer? The liberals. “Two scenarios”? Regardless if the “researchers” looked at a thousand scenarios, if they were based upon the typically bogus “computer model” that nearly every globaloney-ist utilizes, it means absolutely nothing. Besides, if the results don’t jibe with the preconceived notions that surround globaloney warming, they will all just cover things up..

“Even if humans were to stop emitting excess carbon dioxide the effects of global warming would continue to accumulate..” Alright then, it’s too late, so get off of our backs.. “Even if humans stop emitting excess carbon dioxide” EVERY plant on the planet would continue to do so..

“That’s because previously emitted carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere..” It “lingers”.. How convenient. So carbon dioxide is the equivalent of what the bus smells like an hour after the last liberal gets off at the Methadone clinic.. Since it has been “lingering” for centuries, the “source” HAS to be HUMAN..

“The study focused on carbon dioxide because it is the principal greenhouse gas and it can linger in the atmosphere for centuries..” Alright, lets run with this..

The largest source of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has to be the burning of coal. Coal “is the largest source of energy for the generation of electricity worldwide..” (Wikipedia) If the liberals REALLY wanted to lower the “lingering” effects of carbon dioxide they would stand firmly behind the actual “science” of nuclear power. Even if the liberals managed to have everyone ride their bicycles, the effects of all of that huffing and puffing would be an increase in “human” carbon dioxide..

“The model showed these waters would warm very little by 2100 but by 3000 they’d likely increase by 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit in parts..” Please make note of the most crucial word in all of that piffle, “likely”. Not “definitely”, just “likely”. If it turns out otherwise well, the sun was in the “researchers” eyes or the dog ate the “scientists” homework.. They meant well as all liberals do, so their little “errors of enthusiasm” are to be dismissed without consequences or giggles..

This “study” spoke of “intensified winds” as well, winds that can only be matched by the “wind” created by these “scientists” and “researchers” who are doing nothing more than singing for their supper. With all of these government grants and all of the research funding floating about, the only thing that seems to matter is “results”. Not VARIFIED results, just “results” and they had better be scary.. When your “results” are sufficiently frightening, you will need more “funding” in order to do more “research”..

Even when they are found to have the steeple sticking from their backsides it doesn’t matter as the “gravity” of the “epidemic” that they are studying is more important than a few miscues by almost EVERY “researcher” or “scientist” connected to this con job..

Just to cover themselves or just to confuse any reader, they claim that “the changes, some of them will reverse partially” or “the Arctic Sea ice has recovered from its losses by 3000” or “these waters would warm very little by 2100”.. This is nothing more than “scientific spit-balling” and the fact that it is underwritten by colleges, universities and most disgustingly, the taxpayers makes it the REAL “epidemic” surrounding this Marxist moonshine..

“It would be really important to see this in some climate models to see if they find the same result, because every model has its own set of uncertainties..” The whole of the “science” surrounding globaloney warming is nothing but “uncertainties”.. They even took the risk of claiming that “the drying predicted for North Africa could continue even after emissions are stopped in 2100..” There is “drying” in North Africa? Where is the Sahara Desert? It is actually ALL of North Africa, its 3,630,000 square miles covers almost the entirety of this region already and has since well before the evil “humans” and their automobiles took to joyriding in the United States.. “Drying” in North Africa.. Wow, what a scientific discovery..

After all of this silly so-called “science” with its daring predictions of African drying and melting ice, the dark tone takes a darker turn as all of this “science” will have some “far reaching results”. Even after almost all of the imbecile “science” surrounding globaloney warming, climate change or any other pontificating for profit has been publicly disproved, all that we have here is some more “far reaching” passed off as “results”..

Advertisements

20 responses to “Far Reaching Results

  1. They worry about what the climate will be like 989 years in the future, long after they will be gone, but the fact that future generations will be paying for the debt that they are running up is no problem. Thanks Larry, For all you do.

  2. Family,

    THIS is why I need comments..

    PapaBear, I wish that I had made the correlation.

    The liberals “imagine” that carbon dioxide will be here for a thousand years yet the REALITY of their debt will be here longer..

    Thanks my friend,

    Larry

  3. Oxymoron of the day – ” Globalwarming scientists “

  4. How do these globalwarming ‘ scientists’ explain the end of the ice age ?

  5. Margaret in CT

    I just took a break from shoveling three and a half feet of snow off my deck and caught your article. I don’t conlcude anything fron the latest onslaught of the white stuff, but if they hadn’t shot their wads on the global-warming fraud, I have to wonder whether they would have resurected “The Coming Ice Age” that made the cover of Time Magazine in 1972. It is pure hypocrisy to gasp at the record heat waves in the summer and say barely anything about the snows that have blanketed the southern U.S. this winter–in some places, the first in recorded weather history (which goes back only to the 19th century). As I have said in this space before: We have dinosaur footprints in Connecticut, and we have remnants of the glacier in Connecticut (it’s called Long Island Sound). For much of time that those events were occurring, humans didn’t exist, or at least weren’t driving SUVs. Thanks for continuing to point out their folly, Larry.

  6. I don’t know why we should worry about how the world will be affected in the year 3000 AD. In all likelyhood, there won’t be a human race left to deal with it by then.

  7. Thanks Larry for a great article. I particularly like the part about not being able to predict the weather with any degree of accuracy. When I studied meteorology 50 years ago in grad school we could predict weather with greater accuracy without all the so called high tech gear they have today. Incidentally, if you merely predict that tomorrow’s weather will be the same as today’s and do it consistently you will be 50% correct….which is about where we are today with all the sophisticated technology now available. I’ll take lo-tech and no lying anyday!!!!

  8. The only way to save this rock is for ALL Liberals to remove themselves from it. Since a great many of them are dopers they have access to everything they need. Can you imagine the reduced footprint by 3000. I could think of thousands of things to predict for the year 300, but common sense for libs would not be one of them. Great article Larry.

  9. Missed a 0 in 3000. Not 300.

  10. Margaret in CT: This might help you:

    A cartoon showed a heaping pile of snow in a front yard with a huge sign that said: “Unassembled snowmen for sale: CHEAP!

  11. JD,

    Spot on, the old ways were much more reliable.

    Actually, the old ways are pretty much more reliable regardless of the topic..

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  12. JR NOT OF DALLAS

    LARRY Where do you find the time to read all this BS
    and then write your proper analysis.
    I always said the weather reporters say a 80 % CHANCE OF RAIN
    and I looki out and see it is raining How super smart
    Will anyone reading and forecasting this BS be alive in the year 3000
    WHO CARES
    Keep us informed THANKS

  13. I had seen the headline about the year 3000 before I saw your article. My first thought was “Who gives a flying leap?” Then I asked myself “Who paid for this malarky and why?” Larry, your Wordsmithing was exceptional in this post! Loved the ten-ASS-ity and dancing embers of fact. And Graywolf, you are so right. It all boils down to “results”. Doesn’t matter what the results are as long as there are results. My dad, a farmer, could predict the weather better than any TV weatherman, so he was ahead of other farmers when they didn’t heed the weather. I’m going to attach an E-mail which goes hand in hand with this article and the TOTD:

    Understanding Derivatives -A Primer
    Heidi is the proprietor of a bar in Detroit .

    She realizes that virtually all of her customers are unemployed alcoholics and, as such, can no longer afford to patronize her bar.

    To solve this problem, she comes up with a new marketing plan that allows her customers to drink now, but pay later.

    Heidi keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby granting the customers’ loans).

    Word gets around about Heidi’s “drink now, pay later” marketing strategy and, as a result, increasing numbers of customers flood into Heidi’s bar. Soon she has the largest sales volume for any bar in Detroit .

    By providing her customers freedom from immediate payment demands, Heidi gets no resistance when, at regular intervals, she substantially increases her prices for wine and beer, the most consumed beverages.

    Consequently, Heidi’s gross sales volume increases massively.

    A young and dynamic vice-president at the local bank recognizes that these customer debts constitute valuable future assets and increases Heidi’s borrowing limit.

    He sees no reason for any undue concern, since he has the debts of the unemployed alcoholics as collateral!!!

    At the bank’s corporate headquarters, expert traders figure a way to make huge commissions, and transform these customer loans into DRINKBONDS.

    These “securities” then are bundled and traded on international securities markets.

    Naive investors don’t really understand that the securities being sold to them as “AA” “Secured Bonds” really are debts of unemployed alcoholics. Nevertheless, the bond prices continuously climb!!!, and the securities soon become the hottest-selling items for some of the nation’s leading brokerage houses.

    One day, even though the bond prices still are climbing, a risk manager at the original local bank decides that the time has come to demand payment on the debts incurred by the drinkers at Heidi’s bar. He so informs Heidi.

    Heidi then demands payment from her alcoholic patrons, but being unemployed alcoholics they cannot pay back their drinking debts.

    Since Heidi cannot fulfill her loan obligations she is forced into bankruptcy. The bar closes and Heidi’s 11 employees lose their jobs.

    Overnight, DRINKBOND prices drop by 90%.

    The collapsed bond asset value destroys the bank’s liquidity and prevents it from issuing new loans, thus freezing credit and economic activity in the community.

    The suppliers of Heidi’s bar had granted her generous payment extensions and had invested their firms’ pension funds in the BOND securities.

    They find they are now faced with having to write off her bad debt and with losing over 90% of the presumed value of the bonds.

    Her wine supplier also claims bankruptcy, closing the doors on a family business that had endured for three generations, her beer supplier is taken over by a competitor, who immediately closes the local plant and lays off 150 workers.

    Fortunately though, the bank, the brokerage houses and their respective executives are saved and bailed out by a multibillion dollar no-strings attached cash infusion from the government.

    The funds required for this bailout are obtained by new taxes levied on employed, middle-class, nondrinkers who have never been in Heidi’s bar.

    Now do you understand?

  14. JR,

    Since you asked, here is how the “process” works..

    I will hit one of the news collection sites, mostly Breitbart, occasionally Drudge.

    The articles that become the “ammunition” usually aren’t that long, liberals have since the beginning of time twisted each and every word that they use. It’s easy to then “read between the lies” so to speak.

    I go line by line and disassemble the liberal lunacy. This normally takes about two hours. If I typed better, the time would be less.. Bang, boom 1,300 to 2,000 words later, the next NLTZ article. Rocket science, no.

    I usually try to do a quick proof read (This last article unfortunately has three miscues because I didn’t have time to do the proof.. I hate being in a hurry, sorry to those who caught them.) and I submit it.

    If I can do it anybody can..

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  15. “If I can do it anybody can..” You are so wrong on this one Larry. No one… and I mean NO ONE.. can take apart the writings of the liberal lunacy, and make the case of the sane and patrotic as you do my friend. ( I must admit..sometimes I have to refer to a friend, Daniel Webster, to keep up with you) Please keep up what you do. I hope you know how much you are appreciated.
    As for the article…right on spot again my friend. One thing I have wondered about..How do the liberals get along, when they know that all that comes from a liberals mouth is a lie. How can they trust each other? Or is it that they are so stupid, that they actually believe the crap they spew. Just a thought.
    Never Give Up Never Give In…Never Again

  16. Larry
    Glad to help where I can.

  17. Frankie,

    They all “get along” because when theyre in power, they all think that they can “get over” on each other.

    They all tell each other that they will “share the power” while they tell us to “share the wealth”.

    We all know that they share NOTHING, even with each other..

    They DO NOT trust each other. They are at least honest enough with themselves that they know that their every waking moment is devoted to deception.

    That’s my theory.

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  18. btw. I have noticed that they started keeping temperature records around the 1870’s to 1880’s. Shortly after the Little Ice Age ended. I am not a scientist but I have observed a few things.
    1. Earths average temperature would have been rising after 1850, when the little ice age is said to have ended.
    2. At this time, glaciers were probably at maximum size and have been
    shrinking ever since due to the naturally occurring rise in temps.
    3. The earth has been warmer than what it is now during the middle
    ages, about 600 to 800A.D. with no dire consequences. They have
    found vineyards in Greenland and vegetation under the icecap in
    Antarctica.
    I would like them to answer one question. Why is global warming bad for the earth? Look at the benefits. Longer growing season and ability to grow crops at higher latitudes. ( for you Lib’s, further north.) Better health, the cold and flu season would be shorter. And less storms which are caused by the temp difference between the equator and the poles. These to name a few.
    I’m sure glad I don’t have to make up BS theories and predictions to obtain grants that justify my job. I could not sleep at night.

  19. JR NOT OF DALLAS

    Larry Thanks for your response and giving us some insight of how you
    operate. I agree with Frankie you are unique and clever and we are fortunate to have this site to help keep our sanity.
    Richard Great story about Heidi bar.
    My local newspaper is a Democrat poop sheet I only read it for ob’s and
    local news . All the editorials speak of compromise
    Like Obama said we won so November was our turn
    Stick the compromise where the sun don’t shine
    NEVER AGAIN NEVER GIVE UP NEVER GIVE IN

  20. I agree… not “anybody” can do it… and most certainly ‘they’ cannot do it with anywhere near the flair that Larry exhibits!
    Thanks, Larry.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s