Never ones to give up on a good fairy tale, even after almost every one of the so called “scientists” who daringly dangled their weenie within this collectivist campfire has since been singed by the dancing embers of fact, they still trot the same nonsense based upon nothingness out to their more than willing audience.. The easy way around this most recent detour of details is to take your “science” and just claim that the results of your “study” won’t effect the world for another thousand years or so..
Here are a group of “scientists” who cannot tell you with any accuracy what the weather will be like tomorrow but since that have again referred to their “Al Gore Magic Ouija board”, they now know to a certainty what the weather will be like in a another thousand years or so.. The accompanying pie charts and bar graphs may be pretty for the liberals to drool over but since their “scientists” have been caught fudging their “facts”, since they were caught asking others within their progressive pantheon to “overlook” their lack of “facts” and since they haven’t the courage to admit that they are professional liars for profit, it’s nothing more than liberal lunacy..
“Even if humans stop producing excess carbon dioxide in 2100, the lingering effects of global warming could span the next millennia. By the year 3000, global warming could be more than a hot topic..” Using the same “scientific” research as the liberals, I will “predict” that in the year 4976, everything will be adjusting from another Ice Age.. Note the liberal disdain, “even if humans..” Never mind that every volcanic eruption, every hot spring and geyser sends CO2 everywhere.. Maybe the Democratic Deity should stop polluting the precious environment with the all of the flights needed for all of his weekly vacations..
“Using a computer model, researchers looked at two scenarios..” Who programmed this “computer model”? If the programmer had say, an “agenda”, and he or she programmed the software to respond in a particular way, would anyone in their right mind call the results “valid” or even “scientific”? The answer? The liberals. “Two scenarios”? Regardless if the “researchers” looked at a thousand scenarios, if they were based upon the typically bogus “computer model” that nearly every globaloney-ist utilizes, it means absolutely nothing. Besides, if the results don’t jibe with the preconceived notions that surround globaloney warming, they will all just cover things up..
“Even if humans were to stop emitting excess carbon dioxide the effects of global warming would continue to accumulate..” Alright then, it’s too late, so get off of our backs.. “Even if humans stop emitting excess carbon dioxide” EVERY plant on the planet would continue to do so..
“That’s because previously emitted carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere..” It “lingers”.. How convenient. So carbon dioxide is the equivalent of what the bus smells like an hour after the last liberal gets off at the Methadone clinic.. Since it has been “lingering” for centuries, the “source” HAS to be HUMAN..
“The study focused on carbon dioxide because it is the principal greenhouse gas and it can linger in the atmosphere for centuries..” Alright, lets run with this..
The largest source of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has to be the burning of coal. Coal “is the largest source of energy for the generation of electricity worldwide..” (Wikipedia) If the liberals REALLY wanted to lower the “lingering” effects of carbon dioxide they would stand firmly behind the actual “science” of nuclear power. Even if the liberals managed to have everyone ride their bicycles, the effects of all of that huffing and puffing would be an increase in “human” carbon dioxide..
“The model showed these waters would warm very little by 2100 but by 3000 they’d likely increase by 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit in parts..” Please make note of the most crucial word in all of that piffle, “likely”. Not “definitely”, just “likely”. If it turns out otherwise well, the sun was in the “researchers” eyes or the dog ate the “scientists” homework.. They meant well as all liberals do, so their little “errors of enthusiasm” are to be dismissed without consequences or giggles..
This “study” spoke of “intensified winds” as well, winds that can only be matched by the “wind” created by these “scientists” and “researchers” who are doing nothing more than singing for their supper. With all of these government grants and all of the research funding floating about, the only thing that seems to matter is “results”. Not VARIFIED results, just “results” and they had better be scary.. When your “results” are sufficiently frightening, you will need more “funding” in order to do more “research”..
Even when they are found to have the steeple sticking from their backsides it doesn’t matter as the “gravity” of the “epidemic” that they are studying is more important than a few miscues by almost EVERY “researcher” or “scientist” connected to this con job..
Just to cover themselves or just to confuse any reader, they claim that “the changes, some of them will reverse partially” or “the Arctic Sea ice has recovered from its losses by 3000” or “these waters would warm very little by 2100”.. This is nothing more than “scientific spit-balling” and the fact that it is underwritten by colleges, universities and most disgustingly, the taxpayers makes it the REAL “epidemic” surrounding this Marxist moonshine..
“It would be really important to see this in some climate models to see if they find the same result, because every model has its own set of uncertainties..” The whole of the “science” surrounding globaloney warming is nothing but “uncertainties”.. They even took the risk of claiming that “the drying predicted for North Africa could continue even after emissions are stopped in 2100..” There is “drying” in North Africa? Where is the Sahara Desert? It is actually ALL of North Africa, its 3,630,000 square miles covers almost the entirety of this region already and has since well before the evil “humans” and their automobiles took to joyriding in the United States.. “Drying” in North Africa.. Wow, what a scientific discovery..
After all of this silly so-called “science” with its daring predictions of African drying and melting ice, the dark tone takes a darker turn as all of this “science” will have some “far reaching results”. Even after almost all of the imbecile “science” surrounding globaloney warming, climate change or any other pontificating for profit has been publicly disproved, all that we have here is some more “far reaching” passed off as “results”..