It seems like just yesterday that the communist confetti was being washed from the grimy streets of Chicago.. Just a short time ago the Bolshevik bunting was being removed from the grandstands where the wrinkled relics of the left all tried to sidle up near as they could to the aura and flatulence emanating from the progressive potentate.. Those then became the heady halcyon days of liberal “supermajorities”, takeovers and bailouts..
As of late, the Soros administration has been in mourning after they had their steatopygic backsides handed to them in November past.. Now it has become time to re-inflate the lacerated ego of the Marxist marionette. Enter the agreeable automatons of the “impartial” media as they begin to “impartially” prop up, perfume and powder the collectivist clod.. Yes, the left needs to “repackage” and “reinvent” the Kenyan King. Everyone on the “Dork Side” is warming up to start the “second term samba” or as it should be known, “the dance of the devious, the centrist deception”..
The left has to pretend to be looking to the future because everyone else is looking not so fondly to the not so distant past. “Number one priorities” by the bushel basket full created a permanent ten percent unemployment, staggering deficits that may not be erased until liberalism is and too many “takeovers” of once capitalist enterprises.. Only the liberals seem surprised at all of this which is the outcome that always occurs whenever anyone forcibly applies socialism to the capitalist template.. Obama and the left spent (literally and figuratively..) two years jamming their square heads into the round hole of capitalism.. After all, in his own arrogant words, “I won”.. The pressure is on and the liberals have to do what they do best.. Lie. The bigger, the better. What else would you expect from a group that spends considerable time trying to hide their scaly red bifurcated tails from the public’s view..
Leave it to “Time Magazine”, which proudly boasts beneath the “Time” logo, “in partnership with CNN”, (which in reality means “two strikes and you’re out”..) to submit an article entitled, “The Role Model: What Obama Sees in Reagan”. (01/27/2011) What better way to grease the rails of fiction than to try to create a correlation between the worst American president and the best..
Here we learn that “Obama and Reagan share a number of gifts but virtually no priorities”.. This “gift” has to be the backhanded liberal “compliment” calling Reagan “the great communicator”. The left will never understand that it isn’t HOW you say things, its WHAT you say and DO that makes a difference.. It is the courage of your convictions and as well to follow through on your promises.. (Just one Obama example of missing this point entirely: Guantanamo Bay is still up and running..) Obama childishly claims in public that the only reason that the left was trounced in November was because he didn’t “communicate the message better..” The MESSAGE came through loud and clear, THAT is why they lost.. All of the tall tales told from teleprompters made no difference, nor will they in the future.. By the way, about the “priorities”, there is no “virtually” about it..
“Obama was clearly impressed by the way that Reagan had transformed Americans’ attitude about government.” Obama was so “impressed” that he took a stance diametrically opposed to Reagan and he now wonders why he and his “policies” are such resounding failures.. Obama has effectively reinforced America’s attitude towards Reagan’s way of thinking.. Reagan was right.
The slobbering socialists from Time continued to make idiotic references to this imaginary Obama/Reagan symbiosis. “He (Obama) proposed a freeze in discretionary spending and federal salaries, a push to simplify the tax code and billions in cuts to the defense budget..” Wow, how “Reaganesque”.. Try CUTTING spending and ELIMINATING several federal salaries, try CUTTING taxes and try INCREASING the defense budget. THAT would be Reaganesque..
“It’s hard to imagine a president who has less in common with Reagan than the Ivy League lawyer from Hawaii (allegedly) who seeks larger federal investments, a bigger social safety net..” “Federal investments” could and do, mean anything when it comes to the ridiculous Obama “spendathon”. “Investments” is the term the liberal media apologists use when referring to the Obama tax and spend economic black hole.. “Investments” has recently become the left’s ingeniously deceptive way of saying “taxes”, “higher taxes” and or “more and more taxes”.. Raising taxes discourages individual spending and the creation of actual jobs. The only “jobs” ever created by “a bigger social safety net” are those governmental positions that deal with the liberal “adult day care” concept of governing. Lets just call them “repulsive redistributors” for the sake of brevity.. By the way, it isn’t hard to imagine at all..
“He signed a surprise $858 billion tax cut (Formerly known as the BUSH tax cuts. The ones OBAMA wanted to let expire.. The ones the “impartial” media have now made the OBAMA tax cuts.. You’re getting very sleepy..) that would have made Reagan weep with joy..” Here is the WHOLE story: The “surprise” was the “Waterloo Walloping” that the left took in November, similar to the one that they took in 1994 when the last liberal was sullying the White House. Uber leftist Obama had about as much choice in the matter when it came to signing his surrender as the Japanese Foreign Minister had relative to his surrender being signed on the deck of the U.S.S. Missouri in September of 1945..
“In the years that followed, Reagan would come to epitomize all that Obama opposed..” Actually, it is the other way around. According to the article, Obama even regarded the Reagan missile defense shield “ill conceived”.. Hmm.. Imagine Obama at Reykjavik.. “Mr. Obama, we won’t continue unless you agree to end your smart missile defense shield.” “Mr. Gorbachev, you can have anything, just please sign this document for the press back home? Pretty please and can we get some pictures, too?” Reagan WALKED OUT at the mere suggestion. The Soviet Union soon collapsed and that is something that “Obama opposed” as well I am sure..
“Community organizer” Obama said “change in the White House, where Reagan and his minions were carrying on their dirty deeds..” Of course, this was said from the safety and sanctuary of some college, probably on the tax payers dime, “debating” gibberish that could have only been managed with the help of his teleprompter crutch.. These words coming from such a soiled socialist is typical of the blasphemy vomited from the “Target America First” crowd..
Proving that detachment from reality is mandatory with the left, Obama said that his election “would spell an end to the knee-jerk reaction toward the New Deal and Big Government..” In a bizarre way, this is true. Obama has gone all “historic” on the New Deal and Big Government.. He has gone beyond the realistic parameters that anyone would have set for a liberal politician, he will undoubtedly prove to be histories most carcinogenic president. No one let out a bigger sigh of relief than Cornpone Carter did when Obama, the SEIU and ACORN pilfered the 2008 election..
“Unlike Reagan’s, Obama’s central theme remains somewhat mysterious..” “Somewhat?” “Mysterious”?? There is no “mystery” at all.. It started as soft boiled socialism and once the liberals skulking in the Obama shadow unpacked their greasy suitcases in Washington it was “Katie bar the door”.. Here the “impartial” media is trying to soften the low blows of Obamanomics.. Good luck with that..
As they try desperately to Velcro Obama to Reagan, it all falls down like a house of collectivist cards. “He (Obama) wants to reset the public’s attitude toward government, usher in a new era in which government solutions are again seen as part of the answer to the nation’s ills..” Obama’s “government” is RESPONSIBLE for “the nation’s ills”.. Liberal government has ALWAYS been the “problem”, it will NEVER be the “solution”..
The ruse was even extended to Nancy Reagan and a futile attempt to connect her with the failed project of the morphing of Michelle O into Jackie O.. While Obama was signing legislation celebrating the upcoming Reagan centennial, Mrs. Reagan coyly said as Obama took the pen, “You’re a lefty”.. His reply? “I am a lefty..” Finally, the truth.. The “Michelle” project proves that as of late, Democratic First Ladies and even near First Ladies (Theresa Heinz Kerry..) can’t hold a candle to the likes of Nancy, Barbara and Laura Bush. Only Rosalynn Carter had the dignity and decorum the position demanded..
So the liberals think that they can magically create a bond between a man whose visage should adorn Mount Rushmore and a man that makes America say, “any chance that I can change my vote to McCain?” Well, if I may borrow from Obama himself, that is the audacity of a dope..