Please read the following quotes made yesterday by the Secretary of Statists..
“Associates have been reaching out to their contacts worldwide to see how they can ‘get out of this’”.. “We’ve heard about people close to him reaching out to people that they know around the world-Africa, the Middle East, Europe, North America and beyond-saying what can we do? How do we get out of this? What happens next?”
“I’m not aware that he personally has reached out, but I do know that people allegedly on his behalf have been reaching out..”
“Some of it is theatre. Some of it is, you know, shall we say game playing, to try to do one message to one group, another message to somebody else..”
A lot of that is just the way he behaves. It’s somewhat unpredictable. But some of it, we think, is exploring. You know, what are my options, where could I go. And we would encourage that..” (All quotes from news theage dot com dot au 03/22/2011)
The question is, based upon what we have seen and heard, exactly WHO is Rodham talking about, Qadaffi or Obama?
It seems that this “military action” is more closely resembling a game of “hot potato” with Obama and the other members of this “coalition”.. Again we have more from Rodham. “The United States will transfer the lead for the military operations to some other authority within days..” “Some other authority”, what does that mean? Obama himself promised “a swift transfer of command with NATO coordination..” (U.S. France Reach Compromise on Coalition Structure Fox News 03/22/2011) In this same article, a “State Department official” said that this will all be given to a “NATO-backed entity..” No one seems to be mentioning WHO this “transfer” will be handed to..
Obama seems to be looking for something else to place upon his ridiculous resume come 2012. He wants to be able to “take the credit” if things seem to go well. If things fall apart as they very well may do since NO ONE involved wants to actually take charge, Obama wants a cast of characters and banana republics to point his fascist finger at.. That is no way to “lead”. “Some other authority” seems to mean that Obama wants to be able to scrub his fingerprints from this “action” in the eyes of the world while boldly placing Distinguished Service medals upon his collectivist chest when his reelection shampaign starts revving up.. This sounds like Rodham’s “message to one group, another message to somebody else” and it seems to paint a crystal clear picture of Obama the Nobel Peace Prize winner..
Obama, between trips to the beach said, “when this transition takes place, it is not going to be our planes that are maintaining the no-fly zone. It is not going to be our ships that are necessarily enforcing the arms embargo. That’s precisely what the other nations are going to do..” (Fox News dot com 03/22/2011) Trying to please everyone when it comes to the business of war is a tragic mistake that we had to see coming from a person who had no business occupying higher office in the first place.
Even though Obama wants to hide in the impressive military shadow of France, he still sees this as an opportunity to do what he truly does best. “This is something that we can build into our budget..” After spending two years spending and spending, after producing deficits of a “historic” nature, after vacating the capitol BECAUSE of the budget mess that he has created and as he watches (vacations..) from the distance as those left behind try to keep the government running, he still feels that he can “build into” a budget that he has systematically dismantled and destroyed..
The “Democratic Dance of Deception” seems to be sweeping the world or at least the “coalition”.. The French Prime Minister said, “We are not at war”. (France24 dot com 03/22/2011) The Germans have pulled their forces out of NATO. (dailymail dot co dot uk 03/23/2011) The French want a “political steering committee” to oversee the no-fly zone.” (uk dot news dot yahoo dot com 03/23/2011) “A senior State Department official said ‘using that in a broader coalition that doesn’t have a big, fat NATO flag on it, for obvious reasons..” (Fox news dot com 03/22/2011) From the perspective of those actually involved in this “action”, it would be nice if SOMEONE was “steering”..
“The agreed upon arrangement will be ‘something of a hybrid’”. “France, which had been out in front of the crisis, had been making a play for political leadership of the mission and Turkey had objected to NATO taking control..” “The U.S. and France have effectively reached an agreement in their dispute over who will assume command of the U.N.-backed military campaign in Libya..” Wow.. Did Obama and Sarkosy play a game of “rock, paper, scissors”? A collectivist coin toss perhaps?
Back to Rodham again.. “NATO will definitely be involved because we do have a lot of NATO members who are committed to this process.” Well, now we know what the Obama liberals are calling this. It is a “process”.. How sterile. “Tag, you’re it”, isn’t that way this needs to be done. Obama may feel that this is a progressive paintball game and he may be feeling that as he lays in the sun in places like Brazil but EVERYONE else sees it differently..
Obama mentioned what has to be the “mission statement” that has been hardwired into every intrusive governmental “action” ever taken by the left, political, military or otherwise.. “The American people are going to feel satisfied that lives were saved and people were helped..” The quandary for Obama is that he isn’t making any friends and he is alienating the only friends that he had before he became involved in this “process”.
The right knew what was in store for America while the 2008 shampaign was being scripted and read from totalitarian teleprompters. The “independents” felt that heat of betrayal as the takeovers and scamuli were inflicted without restraint. The left, the lunatics so proud of Obama’s stance relative to the war in Iraq, the “please don’t draft me” cowards, now feel what everyone else in the country feels. It is the bitter aftertaste that comes from imbibing the socialist sacraments disseminated by our nation’s narcissist, the perilous and polished progressive..
Here is just one quote from one the members of the inflamed and betrayed left on this kind of “process”.. “The reason I made the comment is a warning. The president has no Constitutional authority. I would move to impeach him. I will lead an effort to impeach him..” Wait a minute, this firebrand fascist is none other than “Stoli” Joe Biden and he made the comments to Christabelle Matthews in 2007.. Has Biden’s perspective changed since his buddy is now “in charge”? Maybe this “process” will end up being one of the things Obama gives to Biden to “fix” like the Scamulous and the budget “process”..
Have no fear, the rudderless reactionary is on his way home as “the White House said Tuesday that Obama would be cutting his visit to Latin America short by a few hours to return earlier to the U.S. on Wednesday..” Based upon his marvelous two year track record of Democratic demolition, Obama can do significant damage in that “few hours” time..
Obama wanted to be “in” when it came to this “military action”, this “attitude readjustment”, this “process” or whatever those who have placed military lives and personnel directly in harms way want to call it. (The fact that no one involved has any idea what to call whatever it is that they are doing is another sign that more than just a little is wrong here..) Allowing others to “take the lead” so that the inevitable “blow back” will be absorbed by others is cowardice. Being “in” and being a “leader” are two altogether different things. Since the fellow travelers are forever looking at the work of the military as nothing more than “war games”, I don’t want them “in”, I would prefer that the liberals be “left out”..