Not Winning

The socialist centrifuge otherwise known as the Obama spin machine has been leaking oil of late.. I find it more than just a little humorous that Obama now is trying to spin his FORCED cuts to his bloated Bolshevik budget to now be a “spending battle” or even better, a “deficit reduction strategy”.. There is but one reason for this “Democratic Definitional Inversion”, the liberal “base” of moochers and mendicants are angry with mercurial Marxist..

In reading an article about this topic at The Hill (“Left’s angst grows over Obama’s shift to the political center” 04/13/2011) we discover that “Obama’s shift to the political center is threatening to alienate the White House’s liberal base..” There is actually quite a lot for the liberal lunatics to be upset about.

First, it might be possible that the liberal base is finally understanding that they are only of importance to the Democrats every four years to the day and not a moment sooner.. The Democrats have always taken the “who else are you going to vote for?” attitude with their chattel and the indentured servants have childishly hitched their “benefits” wagon to the liberal gravy train.. Thus addicted to the liberal handout mentality, they have allowed themselves to be manacled to the “adult day care center” that is the typical liberal Behemoth government.. This is the liberal “compassion” that morphed from the old Al Gore Sr. Democratic liberalism of baseball bats and fire hoses.. The buffoons worked so hard to remove the Democratic manacles only to voluntarily place them back upon themselves.. I would be upset too..

“As Obama prepares to outline his deficit reduction strategy, liberals worry he’ll embrace Medicare and Medicaid cuts..” The stunning thing is the intentional placing of the TRUE liberal priorities in their actual reverse order relative to their importance to the liberals. It should be “Medicaid and Medicare”. Medicare effect seniors, whom the liberals do not really “care” about. They REALLY “care” about Medicaid which is another in the long list of liberal permanent underclass “benefits”. Again, Obama CREATES an “historic” deficit and now he starts planning a “deficit reduction strategy”.. That’s the same as Mary Mallon claiming that she developed a cure for typhoid..

“Liberal lawmakers already were irked with Obama’s decision to support upper-income tax cuts he campaigned against and to launch military operations in the Middle east without congressional approval..” This whole “upper- income tax cut” is the biggest of ALL of the reactionary ruses. Remember when Clinton was trying to appease the knuckle draggers of the left with his tax on those earning “$250,000”. When it was all said and done, that “upper-income” consisted of EVERYONE earning a mere $40,000 or more..

The liberals don’t understand job creation, so their ire at their superiors causes them to demand that the actual “job creators” be punished and the alms then redistributed to the lowest class.. By the way, this idiotic claim of the left being livid with Obama’s “process” in Libya as Rodham indelicately called it, is nonsense. Name the location of those liberals marching and protesting Obama’s Libya “process”.. All that you hear are crickets..

“Rep. Peter (Pan) DeFazio (L-Ore.) this week said Obama should start acting like a Democrat..” Pray tell, what does this mean? This sounds like “Progressive Profiling”.. Which “Democrat” is Peter Pansy talking about? The limousine liberals with their well hidden and well padded bank accounts or the usual urchins who demand that others reward their individual sloth? There is nothing that I love more than laughing at the liberals but they are too stupid to realize that their “friends” in the Democratic party are laughing even harder at them..

The article claims that Obama “is trying to lead from the center without alienating his political base..” Hooey.. The last liberal to sully the White House was also FORCED to the center by a mid-term slap across the face. Another liberal is FORCED to do the same thing for the same reason and they laughingly claim that they are trying to “lead from the center”.. Obama’s “liberal base” will have forgotten about all of this once the liberals get around to buying television time in order to remind the barnacles of who wants to cut their beloved “benefits”..

This whole” lead from the center” ruse is nothing more than their SECOND attempt to fool the “independents”. The “liberal base” hasn’t the intelligence to vote against their “benefits” as someone else in office will expect them to work, so they will vote as they are told like good children would. The independents are the intangible and Obama has lost them through his “historic” deficits, unemployment and spending that have placed a burden upon this nation that will not be erased anytime in the near future. This “change” will NOT come without DRASTIC cuts to the Obama economic nightmares and the liberals are only concerned with their “benefits”, not with the overall good for the entire nation. When the liberals can effectively explain how handing out “benefits” creates a SINGLE job OUTSIDE of the liberal government, then I will believe that they have the best interests of the nation at heart.. I will not hold my breath..

In order to woo the weasels, Obama is also, depending upon whom he is speaking to or at, working on a “spending bill” but unfortunately, “liberal groups have criticized” it.. The ONLY “spending” bill criticized by liberals are the ones that don’t redistribute enough from the EARNERS to the vagrants. It’s another certified case of “crass envy” from the left..

In talking about the 38.5 billion “cut” form Obama’s Bolshevik budget, “programs long supported by Democrats” were “cut”.. This PROVES that all the liberals want to do is spend money. This 38.5 billion represents less than ONE WEEK of Obama spending.. These sacred cows of the liberal left will figure out how to struggle through the other fifty-one weeks of the year..

Every Methadone clinic on the planet must have been empty as every sort of Marxist moron came out from under their rocks to line up and sound off against Obama. The “Progressive Change Campaign Committee”, the Congressional Progressive Caucus” and even the “Congressional Black Caucus”.. They were all concerned about “entitlements”, something which doesn’t exist anywhere except within the parched progressive terra infirma of the liberal mind.. The “PCCC petition collected more than 40,000 signatures in just over two hours..” Mickey and Minnie Mouse could not be reached for comment as to their respective 20,000 signatures each..

DeFazio said, “that’s what the House did wrong in the last Congress, no matter how wrong he was or off-base he was, we never pushed back..” The last “Congress” did EVERYTHING wrong. This was the “House” with a solid DEMOCRATIC majority. They were literally unopposed. Obama has been “off-base” since January of 2009 and the liberals are just now getting around to calling him out about it.. The only “pushing back” that was done at that time was the scratch fights taking place as the liberals in Congress all stood in line outside of the Oval Office in order to sell their votes to the highest bidder..

“Behind closed doors, Democratic leaders are frustrated that Obama hasn’t been more involved, including the spending battle..” The problem is that even though Obama has traveled, golfed and partied more than any other president, the fact that he was “involved” in the Scamulous, the Health Scare nonsense, the bailouts and the takeovers, ALL with these liberals enthusiastic endorsements, has led to the destruction of the economy that hasn’t even been mildly addressed with the $38.5 billion in cuts.. “Behind closed doors” is where you would expect to find the cowardly liberals and their “frustrations”..

“A spokeswoman for the Congressional Black Caucus (Still waiting to hear from the spokesperson from the Congressional White Caucus..) said, ‘we’re not winning’”.. You ain’t alone, sister. Since Obama became the Democratic Dictator, with your ringing endorsement and that of the “liberal base”, NO ONE is “winning”..

Advertisements

18 responses to “Not Winning

  1. Family,

    Here is the latest from TOTD:

    http://noleftturnztotd.wordpress.com/2011/04/14/first-layer-of-the-onion/

    Obama: One and DONE

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  2. You are so right, “No one is winning…” And the truth you pointed out regarding the liberals only complaining when they are not getting enough of the redistribution benefits. We really have our work cut out for us for the next eighteen months or so.

  3. JR NOT OF DALLAS

    WINNING THE FUTURE solgan
    how correct WTF

  4. The regime claimed that approx. 117,00 new jobs were created last month, by companies that ” may or may not ” exist. You read it right – ” may or may not exist ” !! Unbelievable. Therefore, is it OK to say that the fraud in the WH “may or may not” be a US citizen ?

  5. We can be pretty sure now that President Obama will likely have to face a primary challenger of some sort. Even the most dedicated of Kool-Aid drinkers are starting to figure out what they hitched their hopes to, and as Obama’s popularity plummets, and the base gets madder and madder at him, even his staunch supporters will have figured out they have figuratively shackled themselves to an equally figurative corpse.

    We’ll know something’s up when George Soros and Move Along. org choose not to back the Annoited One. We’ve already seen the Spooky Dude keeping his wallet shut during the 2010 elections, and no doubt he’ll be looking for another puppet whom will prove to be a better return for his money. I can see the Progressives draft Hillary Clinton (despite her public protestations), and she could win in 2012, especially if the Republicans are unable to muster anyone better than the milquetoasts which are testing the waters now. In an election between Hillary versus a Mitt Romney or a Mike Huckabee, the Clinton mystique will triumph.

    While the fraud in the White House is likely a citizen (but not a Natural Born one as our forefathers would define one), the fraud ongoing in this regime is very real and breathtakingly brazen and virulent. Mendacity is the order of the day. If any private company committed such acts, their officers would be facing criminal charges, and the FBI would be auditting their books. It is pathetic how accountability is not required from our leaders.

  6. G. Nichols you are so right that the Republicans have no real compelling entries as of yet. And I know he is a ex- local talk show host but I can promise you that in a debate Herman Cain would destroy any libtard that dared challenge him. He is a true conservative and that’s to bad because the Elephant people don’t like those kind of candidate’s. They like to “reach across the aisle and find that middle ground”. Which means that we give in to the Libtards and then they call it a “compromise and doing the people’s business”. Well they sure as hell are not doing my business. We had better hold on because it is going to be a bumpy ride untl Nov. 2012

    Larry as always a great read. JJ – How is the weather in Portland? Spring has sprung here in Atlanta. Looking forward to your visit in Aug.
    Go Dawgs!!

  7. Mickey and Minnie, 20,000 signatures, cracked my ACORN’s up!
    This so-called “historic budget cut” is more of a historic budget scam. The CBO says that the $38.5 billion in cuts will only reduce federal outlays by $352 MILLION below 2010 spending. This “budget cut” if emergency spending is included is actually $3.3 billion more than the 2010 budget. According to the CBO, this is this the result of several factors; increases of spending, particularly at the Defense Department, (which I have no trouble with) decisions to draw over half the savings from recisions; and cuts to reserve funds and money for mandatory-spending programs that might have never been spent!
    Feeling the need for the K-Y Gel yet?
    Obama claims success, pats himself on his back and anywhere else on his pompous ass he pleases, but while he attempts to make war on the rich in class warfare, he can never escape the fact that he is nothing more than a tax and spend socialist, a fact that is becoming more evident to the working and poor and it will drive him into the ground.

  8. Here is an article I received in my inbox……..ouch!

    I hope this isn’t true, but I tend to believe the guy who sent it to me.

    Guess we’ll just have to wait to find out.

    Old Soldiers Never Die, They Just Fade Away
    Gen McArthur

    No Matter What
    By Dr. Walter Williams

    Can President Obama be defeated in 2012? No. He can’t.
    I am going on record as saying that President Barak Obama will win a second term. The media won’t tell you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of millions (or in Obama’s case billions) of dollars to them in advertising. But the truth is, there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be defeated in 2012.
    The quality of the Republican candidate doesn’t matter. Obama gets reelected.
    Nine percent unemployment? No problem. Obama will win.
    Gas prices moving toward five dollars a gallon? He still wins.
    The economy soars or goes into the gutter. Obama wins.
    War in the Middle East? He wins a second term.
    America’s role as the leading Superpower disappears? Hurrah for Barak Obama!
    The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama’s extraordinary deficit spending? Obama wins handily.
    You are crazy Williams. Don’t you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining? Sure I do. And that’s why I know Obama will win.
    The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics. And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated. Even when Obama’s policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn’t his fault. After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office.
    Obama’s reelection is really a very, very simple math problem. Consider the following:
    1) Blacks will vote for Obama blindly. Period. Doesn’t matter what he does. It’s a race thing. He’s one of us,
    2) College educated women will vote for Obama. Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory. It’s really no more complex than that.
    3) Liberals will vote for Obama. He is their great hope,
    4) Democrats will vote for Obama. He is the leader of their party and his coattails will carry them to victory nationwide,
    5) Hispanics will vote for Obama. He is the path to citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic Party,
    6) Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama. He is their key to money and power in business, state and local politics,
    7) Big Business will support Obama. They already have. He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and is gaining more everyday. Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda,
    8) The media love him. They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him. After all, to not love him would be racist,
    9) Most other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him. Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won’t vote Republican. American Indians will support him. Obviously homosexuals tend to vote Democratic. And lastly,
    10) Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama. And he doesn’t need anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned. The President will win an overwhelming victory in 2012.

    — Dr. Walter E. Williams, George Mason University

  9. Richard – I just checked Walter Williams latest article and it is titled “Eating the Rich” and is dated 4/13/2011 it is posted on Townhall. I could not find an article titled “No maater what” so just maybe it is a fake??, boy I sure hope so.

  10. And I am praying it is not true. Isn’t it sad we embrace the negative and shun the positive? That is why this site is so exceptional — we are give tools from Larry to stop, look and listen, then think for ourselves. I am unfamiliar of other sites of this caliber.

  11. Richard,

    I received the same mail from a cousin and I couldn’t believe what I was reading…. and I still don’t. I think this Doctor (a.k.a. “Professor”) Williams was brought up on kool-aid and wearing rose colored glasses since grade school. As most college professors in our colleges today, he’s now teaching college students their versions of the socialist ideological doctrine. Overwhelming win? Obama’s already on the campaign trail, the only thing he is actually good at, I mean has he ever gotten off it since he was elected in 2008?

  12. William,
    I’m not in Portland, nor am I going to Atlanta — you have mistaken me for someone else !! In the past, there was a poster , jj ( lower case letters). Perhaps that is the answer .

  13. JJ – So sorry. We all know what happens when you assume.

  14. William,
    No problem 🙂

    Just curious, but did my comments seem to be coming from the “jj “that you know?

  15. David Dillon

    Joe is just plain ignorant when he criticizes Walter Williams as a socialist
    professor. Williams is a damned good economist who is clearly pro-free markets and pro-capitalism and a long term critic of Barack Obama and he has not been shy about expressing those beliefs. (Google his name and see what you get.) I agree that he is probably wrong but if the Republicans act as they usually and nominate some feckless RINO, he may turn out to be prophetic. Your challenge is to prove him wrong.

  16. Joe,

    Dr. Williams is a fine man and he is trying to make the point that without SERIOUS competition from the right, Obama might skulk back in.

    I may get some folks mad at me but by “serious” I mean not Trump and not Palin. I need to look further into Bachmann.

    Newt is who I would support from the get go.

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

  17. Dr. Williams is a premier guest host on Rush’s show and we always enjoy his dialog. I wish I had taken his classes. I don’t agree with him on this one but he has his facts right. Maybe we should consider his comments and work even harder for “Never Again”.
    Watch out for Trump, he could be truble for EVERYBODY!

  18. Dick,

    Spot on.. Perfect.

    Thanks as always,

    Larry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s