Throughout history, those who have lost conflicts invariably did so because they didn’t honestly size up their adversaries, nor did they properly gauge the severity of the struggle. As well they didn’t consider the type of war that they were engaged in.
For example, if you fight an unconventional war in a conventional manner, you will lose. This is what I feel has befallen the conservative movement, a movement within the Republican Party and a Party that seems to be sending the Tea Party out to sea..
Those who do not or will not concede the fact that the left has declared war on America have not honestly sized up their adversaries and they definitely do not understand the severity of the struggle. The left has declared war. Period. Now, go back to watching American Idol..
Today as OWEbama’s debt takes its toll upon the life savings of the middle class, OWEbama and the liberal lemmings are ALL saying that ALL of THEIR responsibilities in this matter are the responsibilities of .. The Tea Party.. This certainly qualifies as “unconventional” warfare as the idea of removing common sense from daily discourse is at least unconventional.. However, with the left and the rest of the docile within the country, it has become effective, so they return to the template continually, getting a bit more outlandish each time that they return to the perverted plan..
Therefore, it is necessary to fight back using ANY methods necessary, unconventional or otherwise.. The whole Marquis of Queensbury stuff is out the window.
Ignore their claptrap. Present the facts again and again and again. For example, just a moment ago, I watched for only three minutes what passes as the “news” and another of the OWEbama excuse makers was doing their best to deflect the deserved Democratic blame. This person used the words (allegedly) of a conservative commentator and said “it is nice to finally hear a voice of reason”.. The liberals will call you a “voice of reason” either if you agree with their polluted positions or if you haven’t yet managed to reveal their Marxist machinations.
This “voice of reason” comment almost stopped the show.. Had I been there I would have said, “Can you explain your sudden embrace of the whole ‘voice of reason” business? As just one example, how did the left respond to the ‘voice of reason’ that was Joe Liebermann when it came to Iraq? Didn’t the Democrats remove him from his committees and then didn’t the Party back another Democrat to run for his seat? Didn’t Liebermann have to become and independent candidate in order for the voters to return him to his seat? Nice try..
When it comes to “thinking unconventionally”, an unconventional thought comes to mind. This entire “debt ceiling/Dow sell off” is planned. You heard me. Planned.
Some may consider this to be similar to the liberals and their “conspiracy theories” but if the idiots of the left can believe that George Bush placed explosives in both the Trade Center and the levees in New Orleans, then we can have our fun too..
As properly predicted here, the “debt debate” literally ran until the last second. This prompted already nervous “investors”, justifiably nervous since the OWEbama caliphate slithered into Washington, (As well a group that used to soil themselves whenever Alan Greenspan would wiggle his eyebrows..) and at the prompting of the S&P, held a little Bolshevik bonfire that became today’s sell off. Panic filled the air. Panic is nothing more than the liberal aphrodisiac, or since this is OWEbama, wouldn’t that be an “Afro-disiac”?
As with sell offs in years past and when you look at the charts based upon the lowering of Japan’s status a few years back, one sees a steady comeback based upon the availability and the relative inexpensiveness of stocks. These return rallies usually take anywhere from twelve to eighteen months to fully mature. Is there anything of consequence happening in about that timeframe? Say in the area of November of 2012?
Timing is everything and you have to wonder why the S&P would get around to devaluing debt from the United States just recently since OWEbama has been spending and spending and spending like Barney Frank at a Lane Bryant BOGO sale for far too long.. The S&P basically said with the timing of their devaluation that it was merely the DEBATE over the debt, not the debt ITSELF that caused their change of heart relative to America’s solvency.. If exorbitant debt were truly the issue, the S&P would have devalued American credit back after the first imbecilic “Scamulous”..
Therefore I have to ask, “what did OWEbama know and when did he know it”? How long were his negotiations with the S&P so that they would DELAY their devaluation until OWEbama needed them to?
I say to those who are willing to listen, think unconventionally. Most importantly, just “think”.. You have EVERYTHING to lose and if you aren’t willing to fight for it, the liberals will gladly take it from you..