As what’s left of Irene trundles up the East Coast, the nattering knuckleheads of the “globaloney warming” hilarity have found this to be the perfect opportunity to revive that which should have been dead long ago.. Since a “major” hurricane hasn’t hit the U.S. in years, the opportunity for the inherent over-exaggeration that accompanies EVERYTHING near and dear to the liberals black hearts is an opportunity that should not be missed out upon from their perverted perspective.. Nor was it..
Leading the charge is America’s favorite fish wrapping otherwise known as the New York Times. The “headline reads, “Seeing Irene as Harbinger of a Change in Climate”. Within the very first paragraph of this poppycock, we read that Irene is “reviving an old question”.. THEIR “question is, “are hurricanes getting worse because of human-induced climate change?” MY “question” is “when are the liberal “scientists” and their collectivist collaborators going to admit to their REAL motives behind their faux “science”?
Have no fear, the liberals and their “scientists” have NO answers but, just as OWEbama allegedly has his “jobs creation” plans and schemes, they are “working on it”.. “The short answer from scientists is that they are still trying to figure it out..” “Figure it out” simply means that the liberal “scientists” are trying to find a BETTER way to cover their tracks as opposed to emailing each other when it comes to being “found out” as frauds..
These “scientists”, involved in a COMPLETE cover up of their shenanigans through a coordinated email campaign, contained more proven collusion and more proven subterfuge than the entire Watergate “scandal” and these “scientists” are still being taken seriously because they continue to chant the “correct” enviro-mantras..
These “researchers” have come to “differing conclusions about whether that increase (in hurricanes and their strength) can be attributed to human activities..” Those who actually HAVE “differing conclusions” are never heard from and within THIS “scientific” community, they are treated as lepers.. The “science” of the “disbelievers” is consistently debased because it does not jibe with the “science” of “globaloney warming”.. For those not up to speed on the liberal nomenclature, “human activities” is another way of saying, “capitalists” or more specifically, AMERICANS.
The “climate change” claptrap always ends at the shores of the United States, as the OBVIOUS polluters in China, India and Brazil are strangely immune from the collectivist caterwauling of the enviro-nazis. The liberals are at least intelligent enough to keep their socialist side show within locations where they know that they WON’T be thrown in jail or worse.. All that it took was one three million dollar “anti-whaling” boat full of Bolsheviks to get an unplanned visit to Davy Jones’ locker at the hands of the Japanese and the liberals knew that their hogwash would play out better and much more safely here in America..
With the liberals and their “science”, the more vague, the more exciting it is to their followers and the more effective that it will end up being to these simple saps.. “The evidence for a connection between Atlantic hurricanes and global climate change is fairly compelling..” So says “an expert on the issue”, one Kerry Emnauel.. Why would the reporter call Emanuel merely “an expert” when in truth he is a professor of meteorology at MIT.. I am not sure where the intrepid Times reporter retrieved his quote from the professor because back in March of 2008, Emanuel announced that he was rethinking his previous conclusion that global warming increases the threat of more hurricane activity than normal..” (Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society)
Who can find the “crack” in this, a crack that allows all of the necessary liberal wiggle room? The liberals will claim that Emanuel changed his position when “global warming” was the rage, now that the left has pivoted to “climate change”, which is an even more vague postulation similar to “racism” morphing into “institutional racism”, the left has probably reeled the wandering “expert” back into the fold..
In order to find someone who “disagrees”, the Times located Thomas R. Knutson of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Lab in Princeton N.J. When the “impartial” media wants to be “fair”, they always seem to find someone who allegedly disagrees with the liberal “science” but in the end, they always end up agreeing with those that they allegedly disagree with.. “Knutson said essentially that Dr. Emanuel’s conclusion is premature, though he adds that evidence for a human impact on hurricanes could eventually be established..”
Again, the “vaguery” flourishes with the liberal “science”. “Scientists do not have great confidence in their ability to project the magnitude of that increase..” Nonsense, liberal “scientists” DO NOT concern themselves with CORRECTLY “projecting the magnitude” of ANYTHING, their every pronouncement regardless of how idiotic it is, is greeted with warm slaps on the back as long as it supports the established liberal line.. As a matter of fact, the more outlandish and un-provable, the better.. Knutson’s “group” has said that “the annual number of the most intense storms will double over the course of the 21st century but what proportion would hit land is another murky issue..” The liberal “science” of “globaloney warming” or “climate change” is ALL ABOUT being a “murky issue”.
Those who disagree with the liberal “science” may be making just as “murky” a series of projections about something as volatile as the pattern of hurricanes, but THEIR prognostications aren’t being used as a sledgehammer to formulate both opinion and politics. The guesses of the PROPERLY liberal “scientists” are the only ones receiving the ink from the “impartial” media. These glorified “guesses” are then transformed into a blanket condemnation of “human activities” or the “human impact” and soon there are windmills killing too many birds, your car (sort of) runs on bizarre overly subsidized and therefore over priced faux fuels and your “government” begins to demand the type of light bulbs you are allowed to have in the “privacy of your own home”..
Both proselytism and profit drive the liberal’s “science” as well as their politics.. They have a need to herd those who are weak and they do not have an aversion to money, they just don’t like it when those who disagree with them have it.. The liberals REFUSE to claim that they are “guessing”, theirs is a “science”.. Lets look at a few collateral issues, shall we?
Even relative to Irene we have, “If Storm Center moves over land, ‘could be slightly weaker than predicted’” (NHC) As well just a bit later the HNC said, “Storm Weakens, max sustained winds drop..” Now we have liberals like Bloomberg who DEMAND that people “evacuate” reinforcing the liberal need to herd the weak. In order for liberal politics and or their “science” to thrive, there must be chaos, panic or a “crisis”. Something as inexact as a hurricane fits in rather neatly.
The “crisis” is always enhanced by today’s “24 hour” news and weather formats. The “impartial” media likes to MAKE the news, the liberals make their “science” fit their Marxist misinformation. Keep in mind that ANY and ALL information, up to the second, should be utilized in relation to things like hurricanes and no one should take ANY “hurricane” lightly, but the idea of “choice” leaves the liberal lexicon when a kind-of “crisis” looms.. When a GENUINE “crisis” looms, say OWEbama’s attacks upon capitalism or even something like Hurricane Katrina, the Democrats are all mute.
As Katrina crossed the entire Gulf of Mexico, approaching New Orleans at about eight miles an hour, Democrats Knucklehead Nagin and “Cryin’” Kathleen all had no idea what to do for a city whose residents also didn’t seem to know what to do in an alarming number of cases.. AFTER the fact, BOTH Bolsheviks blamed the FEDERAL government because it was headed by a Republican..
Keep in mind that the liberals believe that the ENTIRE universe was created by chance, by mere luck. A hurricane, created by nature and guided by mere chance, is nothing more than the evil machinations of capitalism through greenhouse gases and the like according to the liberals.. That exact same “luck and chance” that assembles a hurricane is written off by “scientists” as “human activities”..
“The ocean has been getting warmer for decades and most climate scientists say it is because greenhouse gases are trapping extra heat..” Note the key word, “most”.. Note that the Times couldn’t locate even ONE of those “scientists” who REALLY disagree with such politically based “science” before this article went to press.. Might I add, which “ocean” is being discussed? What are the temperature readings from ALL of the OTHER oceans during this time frame? The Atlantic appears to be the only ocean that manages to prop up the agitprop of the leftist “scientists” and their fascist friends..
“Damage from hurricanes has skyrocketed in recent decades but most experts agree that is mainly due to excessive development along vulnerable coastlines..” There goes those damned capitalists again.. These “scientists” “pleaded for a reassessment of policies that subsidize coastal development..” Why would “scientists” be concerned with “subsidized” development? Isn’t the “development” the issue or is it the fact that these “subsidies” AREN’T therefore going to these “scientists” to continue their “research”..
These “scientists” find that “large hurricanes” like Irene (some will more than beg to differ on this “large” descriptor” but no one ever seems to hear from them..) are a “harbinger”. I find that the histrionics and the hysteria driven by the liberals and their “science” to be the “harbinger” of the fact that their politics, not the facts, drives their “science”..
“We are optimistic that continued research will eventually resolve much of the current controversy over the effect of climate change on hurricanes..” “Continued research” by liberal “scientists” is ALWAYS SUBSIDIZED.. “But the more urgent problem of our lemming-like march to the sea requires immediate and sustained attention..” Not quite, professor.. I find that the liberals and their “lemming-like” attraction to the profits and propaganda of their “climate change” and the requisite hysteria and hoopla that has enveloped their pseudo-“science” is what actually “requires immediate attention”..