Two of the OWEbama administration’s groups of socialist simians, the “impartial” media and the so-called “protesters”, are trying their level best to deflect attention away from the OWEbama failures. November 2012 is a long way away, these urchins certainly don’t have the staying power to be an “issue” as the election nears. However, their “aroma” will certainly have the “staying power” that will perplex those who will invariably have to clean up after the liberal infants..
Yes, the liberals are upset with the “rich”. They aren’t upset with ALL of the “rich”, they are only upset with CERTAIN of the “rich”.. When looking at the list of certified liberals who deserve their place on this imaginary “list” of the “rich”, one has to determine that their exclusion from any of these “protests” has everything to do with the Bolshevik blinders that have been placed upon these protesters by the OWEbama administration.. It would appear that the left and all of its sub-cretins have an allergy to not only deodorant but to their own inherent hypocrisy as well..
As the humorous threats of “millionaires marches” loom, I wonder if Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Tim Robbins, Oprah, Alex Baldwin, etc, etc, will be targeted for inclusion. Nahh.. If the Democratic dimwits are considering a march on Michael Moore’s mansion, I will help them in their travel plans as this is the only mansion in America with both a Dunkin Donuts and McDonalds within the gated walls of the property..
As we ponder the list of liberal “rich celebrities” who have been fascinatingly omitted from the shrieks and howls of the unwashed, we should wonder if ANY of the “Wall Street” executives who laid large donations upon the OWEbama alter in 2008 will be seeing any vituperative visitors.. Nahh..
Topping the list of hypocrites would have to be the liberal “politicians” themselves. As they bellow and coo to the socialist savages, their “richness” is either conveniently forgotten or it is carefully hidden away from view.. Not ALL of the liberals are as enterprising and stealthy as Louisiana’s William Jefferson.. At or near the top of this list would have to be Miss “God bless” herself, Nancy Pelosi..
According to the Washington Times (“Pelosi’s disclosure belated in husband’s land deal” 10/10/11) the Botox Bolshevik’s husband is a “real estate developer and investment banker.” What is it about “real estate” that has posed such a problem for the liberals? We have the godfather of the shady land deal, Nevada’s crime boss Harry Reid, we have the Clinton-McDougal shenanigans and of course, the OWEbama-Tony Rezko embarrassments.. Thank the Lord that NONE of these liberals are “rich” or else they might have to have their indentured servants take time away from preparing their meals or washing their limousines for them in order to pick up fascist feces from their front yards once the trolls depart..
Paul Pelosi has blessed the left with yet ANOTHER Whitewater, this one entitled, “Russell Ranch”. His “investment” is said to be worth “at least $5 million and possibly as much as $25 million..” Isn’t it fascinating that in this day and age of the OWEbama destruction of the real estate market, (one among many “markets” targeted by the totalitarian..) the liberals invariably seem to instinctively KNOW which real estate schemes to “invest” in.. I obviously need the help of the brilliant liberals like Pelosi as my “assessed” real estate value, assessed for the purposes of stealing TAXES and/or REVENUES, assessed by a “politician”, keeps going ever higher when the REALITY of real estate prices keeps going through the floor.. Isn’t just a little ironic that there is such a VAST difference in the ASSESSED value of our homes and the REALITY of what they would sell for in the OWEbama decimated real estate market.. This “reality” only effects those not as “rich” as the nation’s Pelosi’s.. Again, no protests at any Pelosi palace..
The Pelosi “investment” was “initially between $1 million and $5 million nearly a dozen years ago..” It would seem that Pelosi needs to proffer the advise of Rodham who managed to turn a measly hundred thousand into millions literally over night.. It would appear that “cattle futures” are more quickly lucrative than real estate.. The Pelosi’s MUST be MUCH “richer” than the Clinton’s if they can have their disposable income laying in wait for that many years before it mysteriously “matures”..
This Pelosi scam was orchestrated by one Angelo Tsakopoulous and all that managed to happen, other than the “riches” the Pelosi’s landed, was Angelo’s daughter was made the ambassador to Hungary.. The “Swamp Thing” doesn’t understand the whole “change” thing or is it just that the rules that are forcefully applied to the rest of the nation are NEVER “equally” applied to the RICH liberals? Seems silly to ponder, doesn’t it..
This land is going to shoot up in value because it is going to be “annexed” by the city of Folsom California. WHO “annexes” land? Other politicians. Who stands to gain a windfall profit, a windfall profit that WILL NOT be “fairly” taxed as it would if you or I were doing the “investing”? A politician who claimed that she would run “the most honest, most open, most ethical Congress in history..” and her husband.. Oops.. Then again, this chicanery is being orchestrated by the liberals, so the rest of the liberals, regardless of their unfamiliarity with a bathtub, will look the other way..
Even though this “investment” was made in “the late 1990’s”, “Ethical” Nancy “first listed the investment in May 2010..” This decade-long lapse of “disclosure” was done on “forms that are required annually and are supposed to identify assets she and her husband have that are worth more than $1,000.00..” This is a limousine liberal, so if each form was to denote a thousand in value, the paper alone would kill a thousand trees.. At least TEN of these forms were submitted WITHOUT mention of this “investment”.. That sounds about right for a hypocrite..
“Nadeam Elshami” (The proper spelling should be: Nadeam El-SHAM-ee) said that the Russell Ranch “investments” were absolutely OK because “it was held in the name of another company her husband owns, Forty-Five Belden Corp., which is a Subchapter S corporation..” Uh ohh, here comes the socialist shell game, watch carefully as things are going to get even more murky..
A “Subchapter S Corporation” pays NO federal income taxes. The alleged losses and dividends are divided up between the shareholders and they are obligated to report their income or losses on their individual income tax forms.. NOW we can understand the confusion on the liberals part as the WHOLE idea of THEM paying taxes of ANY kind is always forgotten, jettisoned or misplaced.. Or it could be some other type of mental malady, just ask Charlie Rangel.. Where are the “protesters” and why aren’t they camping out on ONE of the Pelosi porches? This is before we even get into all of the ILLEGALS that work in their vast vineyards..
Brace yourselves, “the House does not require such disclosures for Subchapter S Corporations”.. “Federal officials usually (usually??) have to list the underlying assets of their privately held companies that hold investments..” UNDERLYING is what this is all about and STILL the “protesters” of the “rich” can’t seem to locate ANY of the Pelosi residences..
The question has to therefore become, if she is not REQUIRED to list such shadowy “investments”, why is she doing so OVER ten years later? According to the aptly named Pelosi spokesweasel ElSHAMi, she “voluntarily decided to list it separately for clarity and transparency reasons..” Oh no, it gets better.. Making note of the OBVIOUS and ILLEGAL use of political power to place a “friend” into a cushy ambassadorship, having that “friend” increase the size of the liberal’s already impressive bank account for the ILLEGAL favor, well, Pelosi’s pontificator called “any such claim ‘ridiculous’ and ‘false’”.. These are the liberals, they have said it, therefore it is true..
Craig Holman, representative for “Public Citizen” a “Washington-based consumer advocacy group” said “I can’t imagine why a class of companies are exempt from disclosing their underlying assets..” I CAN imagine.. It just might be because EVERY Democrat or even EVERY politician in Washington has over one hundred of these “companies” in their stealthy portfolios..
Tsakopoulous also netted the Pelosi’s “between $1 and $9 million from four real estate investments” right about the time that this fellow’s daughter was itching to become an ambassador.. This is JUST a coincidence.. Pelosi glowingly said AFTER the daughter managed to land this post, that the new ambassador would “bring a spirit of entrepreneurial, democratic ways to her service to Hungary..” Based upon the underhanded ILLEGAL ways that this “ambassador” got her job, I will not take the sucker bet that this “ambassador” DOESN’T understand the “Democratic ways”.. I just wonder WHY the “rich” protestors don’t.. Who swore this ambassador in? Collectivist cattle future genius Rodham..
Old Man Pelosi said that “there is no story here”.. That is the problem, there is a HUGE “story” here and no one is going to tell it correctly. “My business dealings have nothing to do with my wife’s political career”.. That is ANOTHER problem, they SHOULD because they DO. There is “no connection..” And there is “no connection” between Twinkies and Oprah’s circular physique.. The bottom line, there is “no connection” between liberalism and reality..