Recently, I found myself within the proximity of a local progressive puler.. This has its positives and its negatives. The positive is that this oddball unleashed a new liberal “word” that I hadn’t heard before which has led to the writing of this article. The negative is due to the inherent liberal allergy to deodorant and bar soap, my olfactory senses are still reeling and may never truly recover from this assault..
Here is the very small but potent quote from the lunatic, “the poor live in underserved areas..” “Underserved”.. Lets dismantle this collectivist compassion..
“Under”. This syllable, also a “word” itself within the lunatic liberal lexicon, is highly toxic and it is a staple of their socialist sanctimony. In this case, when it is combined so closely with the syllable/word “served”, we must look into what has preceded it in order to determine who or what has been “underserved”. As always when this is bandied about by the liberals, the subject is the “poor” who have become a “four letter word” to those of us who DO NOT wish to have the money that WE have EARNED forcibly removed from us and redistributed by the compassionate collectivists..
“Under”.. Here “under” means that the “poor” just simply aren’t “getting enough”, fill in the blank.. Please keep in mind that when it comes to the left and their faux compassion for those identified as being in the “under” subclass, there will NEVER be “enough” GIVEN to them by the left. “Enough” CANNOT be limited to any one commodity. They can’t have “enough” free housing, health care, groceries, utilities, etc, etc.. For the sake of brevity, without the MONEY taken from others, NONE of these amenities that we WORK for could be GIVEN TO those in the “unders” class who have the arbiters of “fairness” as their masters/protectors/providers.
There will NEVER be enough money handed to these urchins which will spontaneously cause them to become middle class, responsible individuals. There will ALWAYS be another “problem” that the “unders” suffer through, (usually imaginary..) so the clarion call will again be sounded from the horns of heresy for another round of redistribution.. This “under” mentality always appears whenever the abject failure known as the public schools are mentioned. The “problem” is always the “fact” that they are “under-funded” and that is the ONLY problem..
Lets look within the last paragraph at a word that the liberals will facetiously tell you is their “goal” through their redistribution racket but using “definitional inversion”, as we MUST when listening to the left, we find the diametric OPPOSITE to be the truth.. “Responsible”..
This is the LAST thing that the left EVER wants from ANY of its indentured servants. The liberals have been rewarding them for generations simply BECAUSE they have been “irresponsible”.. By their actions, the left ENCOURAGES individual stupidity.. Those who act “responsibly” wouldn’t, for example, have children that they cannot possibly hope to support themselves WITHOUT the “help” of the liberal left via the tax dollars stolen from the RESPONSIBLE. The “responsible” DO NOT become VICTIMS and liberalism is ALWAYS in dire need of as many of these helpless individuals as they can acquire/create/retain..
The “unders” MUST become addicted to the liberal “idea” that the liberal government has the cures for all of their ills, real or imaginary.
“Served”. Here the liberals believe that these allegedly ambulatory humans need to be “served” by the liberal Behemoth government and its empathy.. Those who need to be “served” are not required to do anything more strenuous than standing in a line somewhere or barring that, stepping out to the mailbox.
When the left succeeds in convincing the “served” that they themselves are “responsible” for NOTHING (including their lot in life that is the direct responsibility of their individual sloth, not any imaginary “-ism” in the air..) very bad things happen. The liberal idea of government addiction led to the unnecessarily high loss of life due to Hurricane Katrina.. This is but ONE example of the left’s “compassion” and how it REALLY effects those they allegedly seek to “help”..
What good could possibly come from the idea of a large number of people being “served” (waited on..) by the left? By “serving” people, they are robbing them of the dignity that accompanies accomplishment. Once thoroughly robbed of self-respect, they easily conform to the idea that SOMEONE OWES them something. This “something” then becomes a RIGHT because the liberals say that it is, and when ANYTHING becomes a “right”, the government HAS to be involved in its “proper” dissemination..
The left NEVER wants those that they “help” to actually succeed. They want the impression to exist that they do and they hammer home the “idea” that the ONLY thing holding people back are the imaginary hobgoblins allegedly created by the hateful to stunt the “progress” of the poor..
After generations of failures (Allegedly.. I believe that these generations of the hapless and the helpless are actually a “success” from the liberal perverted perspective..) regarding the liberal’s “war on poverty” (a “war” that was actually on the middle class who HAD to pay for the liberals empathy..) after trillions of wasted taxpayer dollars, why haven’t the liberals tried something NEW if they ever really intended to END “poverty”?
The liberals know that if the poverty that they themselves are enabling were ever actually “cured” there would be no need for the millions of liberals who now pollute both the federal government and society in general. If the “underserved” became independent and self sufficient, what would there be left for the liberals to do? (I fully contend that if we could strip the “poor” of the right to vote, the left would drop them like a hot potato..)
THAT is why the left actually works TOWARDS the idea of endless poverty and the perpetuation of the lowest class, not AGAINST it. The left will work towards EVERY class and race separation device that they can find as the SEPARATION of Americans is the socialist’s seat of liberal power.. NO ONE demands an “unequal” society MORE than the liberal left.. The “underserved” are the “victims” of LIBERALISM and nothing else..
The “underserved” need Methadone to remove the addiction to maternal Marxism..