I hope that you are sitting down as what I am about to say may shock you.. The liberals lie..
I know, I know, it’s hard to believe, isn’t it? The liberals are actually addicted to lying, anywhere from little bitty ones to gigantic whoppers. They will never get over this collectivist curse for a number of reasons..
The first and foremost reason for the liberal habit of lying is that it forms the fascist fulcrum of liberal politics. Simultaneously, the lowly urchins of the liberal left do not have any compulsion towards the truth. The limousine liberals have learned from their earliest incarnations that their chattel will believe ANYTHING that they utter in public.
Supporting this psychosis is the fact that “facts” or “the truth” have no place whatsoever within the liberal nonsensical nomenclature. All that needs to transpire is for one of the Marxist members of the progressive pantheon to make a statement and those who depend upon the left for their sustenance unequivocally ingest it as socialist scripture.. Over the years, the most effective of the liberal gibberish has been just large enough to fit upon a bumper sticker and nothing more.. Or it becomes the childish poetry of certified imbeciles like Jack$on or $harpton..
In all honesty, the larger and more ridiculous the statement, the more easily that it is not only swallowed by the Bolshevik bottom feeders, but the more quickly that it is then trumpeted by the liberal political partners in slime, the slugs of the “impartial” media..
The moment that the “1%-er” liberals discovered that the “lie” was more effective to their cows and bovines was the moment that the liberal political paradigm changed entirely. Gone were the “Democrats” like JFK and Moynahan.. Once the realization that the “facts” had no significance to the liberal voting base and once that realization was properly reinforced at the ballot box, all bets were off.. Let’s take a quick look at one of the earliest moments where the collectivist compulsion for lying began, with the so called “War on Poverty”..
At this “historic” moment, the Democratic slavery was undergoing a visceral transformation. The generations of slaves who had previously been corralled through the Democrat’s fire hoses, baseball bats and lynchings needed to be brought back into the Democratic fold before they wandered into the Republican camp. After all, the Republican Party was founded based upon the desire to END the slavery that the Democrats were so fond of.. They needed a trick, something that would be less visually offensive to the world as their old Democratic habits of fractured skulls and burning crosses, so they settled upon the intellectual slavery of “benefits”.. The faux collectivist compassion of the “War on Poverty” could not have fit the bill any better.
This “War”, from which there is no Democratic “exit plan”, one that has cost countless lives and has cost the nation uncounted trillions in treasure, was to be “fought” by Lyndon Baines Johnson. Was it his “compassion” for the poor that drove him? Was it his need to “level the playing field” for those who weren’t as fortunate as the typical “1%” liberal Democratic politician? No, his motives, if you will pardon the pun, were much darker..
According to Ronald Kessler (“Inside the White House”) Johnson revealed the TRUE Democratic motivation for all of their sudden diametrical Democratic “compassion”. According to Kessler, while bragging about his “efforts” on Air Force One, Johnson said, “I’ll have those n****** voting Democratic for the next 200 years..”
Take away all of the Bolshevik bombast, dry all of the faux tears of “compassion” and all that you are left with is the same Democratic Party with the same motives and the same goals as they have had for hundreds of years.. They’ve just tweaked it for the unobservant.. They’ve fine tuned it so that their halos will always be at the proper angle so that they will radiate the proper amount of “compassion and caring” for the cameras and microphones of the “impartial” media..
The subtlety of re-enslaving the poor while sanctimoniously fighting a “war” on poverty on their behalf was stunning in both its efficiency and its effectiveness.. The liberals themselves HAD to be flabbergasted by the ease and simplicity of the transformation of the gullible. Almost effortlessly, they were redirected back to the SAME people who just a few moments before were engaged in a DIFFERENT, more “hands on” sort of “war on poverty”.. Over time, this “war” on poverty became the cornerstone for their new and improved “War on the Rich” which was empowered by their instinctive “class separation” psychosis.
Now that generations have been securely indentured, the reactionary ruse needed to be realigned to a war on the “rich”. They HAD to properly enflame the “have-nots” who skulk and slither at the bottom of the Democratic gene (cess)pool.. As with EVERY liberal scheme before and since, there is no consistency to what it is that they are doing. It is a war on CERTAIN “rich”. Those “rich” from Microsoft, Facebook, Apple and so many others are properly exempt from the bellicose Bolsheviks and their collectivist cries for the entirety of their bank accounts to be sequestered for righteous redistribution..
The “lie” of the war on the “rich” also masks the GENUINE liberal war on the “NOT-SO RICH”. The middle class must be ensnared within the liberal fight plan because they have proven to be more than compliant over the entire course of the sixty-year liberal “war”.. Besides, there are only a few “rich”, there are millions of members of the middle class and bleeding them whilst claiming loudly to be targeting the “rich” has proven to be just as easy for the liberals as the reinstallation of the manacles of slavery to the liberal’s beloved lowest class..
The left has done this by simply changing the definition of what actually constitutes the “rich”. Under Billy Bob Clinton, the “rich” were those making $250,000.00 at the onset, when push came to shove, the Clintonian “rich” were those making $40,000.00.. Amazingly at the same time, the liberals were also changing the definition of the “poor”..
When the puling progressives begin to snivel, snort and honk about the “poor”, they try to assemble dusty old mental images of the “Dust Bowl” settlers with their clapboard carriages and their starving progeny.. The “reality” of the liberals “poor” have multiple color televisions, cellular telephones, automobiles, air conditioning and that is before we get into the listing of ALL of the “benefits” that the liberals have accrued for their “deprived” voting base..
The fact that the liberals lie with such frequency and ferocity, their “lies of any size” plan, is not a surprise to the cognizant or even the mildly observant. This progressive pogrom has been in place for well over sixty years. The fact that so many of the REST of us do not recognize and identify this Democratic deviousness and the fact that these same repeatedly return these thieves to political power is what I find so surprising..