The fact that the left gets SO upset at the mere mention of “religion” is still perplexing to anyone who is even mildly observant.. Liberalism itself is unquestionably a religion in the eyes of its “followers”.. They are “followers”, no they are travelers, make that “fellow travelers”.. That’s much better..
The left has often stomped and bellowed over the “separation of church and state”. This “concept” can ONLY be found within a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists Association in 1802 yet it, like SO many other imaginary concepts brought up through postulation alone, it is now considered sacrosanct within the liberal ethos for political expedience.. (This is also the perverted place where ACTIONS are deemed “speech” and abortion is to be discovered DEEP within the right of privacy..) To the left, the words written in this letter are then taken and written into stone within the liberal “religion” yet the words written in the Constitution are to be disregarded when they DO NOT fit within the progressive paradigm. This the moment when the whole “living document” business, so popular with the judicial activists of the left, bubbles to the surface..
I find this “separation” in relation to the liberal RELIGION to be another demented dichotomy that has become all to reflexive to concept of liberalism.
Lets also state that liberalism is without question a “religion” to its adherents in both thought and deed. Lets also state that the separation of church and state is a concept with VERY limited application within the liberal world. We should think of this as the left’s inherent “immoral absolutism”.. (Let us also state for the record that their exalted temple sits in Washington D.C., but a bit more on that later..)
The left would like you to believe that they think in terms of “grays” (in order to believe this, you must take at face value that the liberals have the capacity to “think” and I realize what an absolute stretch of logic this has to be..) but the left is ALL ABOUT thinking in terms of “black and white”.. With the left, this phrase takes on numerous meanings as the absolutism of “black and white” also crosses over into their political definition of “black and white” in terms of the left’s racial discrimination to be found within “quotas”..
The left’s unique Bolshevik blinders makes you understand why the left doesn’t question the LACK of a “separation” of both church and state within the Mooselim “world”. Why doesn’t this even cross the liberal’s highly tuned reactionary radar? The best explanation can be found within the fact that the liberal “religion” is quite similar the to Mooselim religion and the fact that BOTH seek an absolute FUSION of religion and state.
As well, the Mooselim “religion” is completely off the table when the denigration of religion is the topic at hand. Christianity and Judaism are the ONLY “religions” that will be found within the collectivist crosshairs as they pose the biggest threat to the religion of liberalism.. Even MORE shocking to those of us functioning with our eyes OPEN is the absolute FACT that literally EVERYTHING that the left stands for within “their religion” (drug use, pornography passed off as “entertainment”, gay rights, gay marriage, religious aversion, THEIR free speech, their right to protest etc., etc..) would ALL immediately be outlawed under the penalty of death if the liberal’s buddies were to take over the world..
It must be a shock to a liberal when they are confronted with the overwhelming evidence that liberalism IS a “religion” and it’s a “religion” that they fervently practice. Then again, “proof” always brings about a severe allergic reaction from the apostles of the left with outbursts similar to Tourette’s Syndrome.. “Proof” is the wooden stake through the heart of liberalism and when it is presented to those who have properly swallowed and digested the Eucharist of liberalism, its denunciation must be done at the highest of decibels..
Can we logically call liberalism a “religion”? They certainly PREACH about liberalism and its many benefits in order to convert you to their “religion”. They believe in “god”, however their “god” looks an awful like each of the liberals themselves and as “gods” within their own pantheon, their thoughts and deeds are both “pure” and above reproach.. The air of omnipotence surrounds the liberals every thought and deed not unlike a powerful but polluted perfume..
The liberal’s sanctimony therefore springs from this self-imposed “purity”. If you ask them, they bear no malice, they bear no hate, and therefore there is a purity that permeates the entirety of the liberal “religion”. This reminds me of the “thoughts” of the crackpot General Jack Ripper from “Dr. Strangelove” where he spoke constantly of a “purity of essence”.. Purity of thought, purity of motive, purity of action, purity of essence..
They also lay claim to an unusual “inclusiveness”, they operate out of a “big tent of ideas” that allegedly EVERYONE has access to and where EVERYONE’S “ideas” are to be “tolerated”.. Again, the “purity” sniffishness exhaled by the liberals falls well short of the mark when you merely DISAGREE with them.. THEN the left goes all “Old Testament” on you.. Fire and brimstone, death by plague, you name it, its ALL descending down from the liberal Nirvana upon those who have done nothing more than to “disagree” with them..
The apostasy of “disagreement” within the liberal “religion/politics” gets one excommunicated in the most unattractive method possible. What happened to Joe Liebermann when he “disagreed” with the liberal “political/religious” line on the War in Iraq? If the left could have figured out a way to stone him to death outside of the Senate like their religious contemporaries from the Middle East do for such heresy, they would have dispatched Joe post haste and the “impartial” media would have danced and thrown candy in the streets..
The liberals cannot deny that there is a complete merging of their politics (the “state) and their “religion”. Within the liberal world, the government is another of their “gods”. The liberals would like nothing more than to transform the “government” into a Democratic deity run ONLY by the benevolent liberal gods themselves.. This is another of the reasons that the left targets actual “religion” for termination because when religious institutions are no longer available, everyone will HAVE to turn to the liberal “religion/god” of government for the “answers”.
If the liberals were at least honest about themselves, a public confession of their “religious” beliefs would go a long way towards explaining their bile towards “other religions”, but “honesty” is as foreign to them as intelligence and hygiene..