No one really likes a pop quiz but here goes.. Who is Floyd Corkins? Floyd Lee Corkins? Don’t know? You’re not alone and there are a number of very good reasons for that..
This Corkins is the LIBERAL gay rights activist who opened fire at the Family Research Council in Washington. I would also quiz you as to whether the coverage of this event by the “impartial” media were in any way “biased”, if there had been ANY coverage by them at all..
Don’t believe me? Go ahead and type “Family Research Council shooting” into a browser and note the DEARTH of “news” available.. Imagine the amount of puling coverage this type of incident would have received if the recipient of this hate had been any of the nation’s friendly abortion abattoirs. The suspect would have been immediately branded a “conservative” and its open season from that moment on..
As well take note that when events allegedly “happen” and the alleged “victims” are obviously liberal, the media immediately identifies the suspect as a conservative or better yet, a “right winger”.. When it turns out that these “incidents” were actually perpetrated by the VICTIMS themselves, (which happens to be the case in almost ALL of these fictitious “hate crimes”) there are NO apologies or retractions from the “impartial” media.. The damage is done, they just move on, no harm, no foul..
Now the “impartial” media just ignore the “news” if they can’t figure out a way to use it to further the liberal cause.. This phenomenon has come about since the media now considers it to be their mission statement to MAKE or SHAPE the news rather than “reporting” it. This seemed to start with the uber-paleo-liberal Cronkite.
When America didn’t kick or snort when fed the communist line by “America’s most trusted newsman”, the rest of the media midgets began to follow suit and pile on.. The heyday for “coming out of the ‘impartial’ news closet” seemed to be the Tet offensive. Now the “impartial” media all proudly boasts about carrying the flag bearing the hammer and sickle, not unlike the nation’s pedagogues and all of the members of the Democratic Party..
Lets take a gander at the DEARTH of coverage by trying to find ANY coverage.. I found ONE outside of Fox News from the “impartial” folks at CNN.. Their “coverage” devoted as much space to clucking about an alleged thousand-dollar donation by Don Cathy of Chic Fil A to the FRC. Their “story”, ALLEGEDLY about the SHOOTING at the FRC, even included Cathy’s quote that originally sparked the “uproar” that blew up in the faces of the “compassionate until you disagree with us” lefties..
Where are the usual liberal howls about “injustice”? Where are the collectivist caterwauls about how horrible “guns” are? Since the criminal was a gay rights “activist”, the non-actions of the “impartial” media appear to be a tacit approval of the criminals actions.. “Appear to be”? No, they ARE..
The Washington Post considered Corkin’s typically demented liberal thought pattern to be nothing more than “a disagreement” with the FRC.. When someone “disagrees” in a manner similar to this and a liberal or a liberal organization is the TARGET, not the SUSPECT, is the “impartial” media coverage as sparse and unfocused as it was in the most recent case in Washington? Seems silly to ask, doesn’t it..
Who can forget, as just ONE of the hundreds of verifiable tall tales told without repercussions, the fictitious fabrication that was woven by Tawana Brawley.. With NO proof of ANY kind and with the wispy-haired windbag $harpton ever at the ready, the “impartial” media rushed to the scene and broadcast each and every out and out LIE by both Brawley and $harpton.
As each moment passed, the “story” became more sinister and diabolical as the horror of yet another “hate crime” became the “impartial” media’s opportunity to pick up ratings and therefore sell more commercial space.. The “impartial” media NEVER spent even a single moment delving into this lunacy in order to “tell the truth” to the American public. It was all about hysteria. It was all about the sale.. The idea of “media integrity” is as shallow and meaningless as an OWEbama political “promise”..
From Tawana we now move to the FRC shooting. There was definitive proof corroborated by numerous verifiable witnesses and a genuine “victim” of a shooting by a typically deranged liberal. Based upon the statements made by the liberal suspect, this is at least a hate crime as well as a case of domestic terrorism. Yet the “impartial” media appears to be too busy following the OWEbama “deflect and distract” shampaign over Romney’s tax returns to have properly covered a true news story that had another of the liberal urchins and underlings as the culprit..
Corkin’s also had 15 Chic Fil A sandwiches in his backpack proving that the left has more than ONE member of the Michael Moore Buffet Buster Club on their roster of ridiculous reactionaries.. At his first hearing, Corkin claimed to only have “$300 to his name..” I have to have a go with that..
First, Chic Fil A says “thanks for your business, tubby..” Second, $300.00 is about all ANY downtrodden, misunderstood liberal FAILURE would have “to his name” (as FAILURES, their desire to cling to the socialist Democratic anti-capitalist message is all the stronger..) and third, if you didn’t need fifteen sandwiches to feed yourself every six hours, you might have a bit more “to your name” than $300.00.. I guess Mommy Corkin won’t be getting her rent money for putting Floyd up in the basement for a while..
As well, refer back to the CNN “article” allegedly about this incident. The idea that Don Cathy would, at any time, donate $1,000.00 to the FRC is about as “news worthy” as announcing that George Clooney likes to sniff OWEbama’s progressive posterior.. (For a price, of course..)
This falls into the “impartial” media’s desire to create an excuse for every guilty liberal suspect. The constant Democratic drumbeat of “hate”, the liberal’s need to define their opposition as being driven by “hate” (as a distraction from the FACT that THEY are the ones consumed with “hate” for those who disagree.. Progressive projection..) creates a frenzy within the liberal bottom feeders like Corkins who are already are predisposed to mental instability simply by being a liberal..
As the cherubic gay rights activist’s plan was coming as unglued as he evidently is, he said, “I hate what the people in this building are doing, I don’t like your politics”.. Uh ohhh.. I’ve always been told that there is no place for “HATE” within the liberal lexicon.. Sorry, I just couldn’t resist.. I find that as humorous as the whole “religion of peace” piffle.. Within this statement made by a typically unhinged member of the left, ALL of the motives employed by the left are boldly on display..
“Hate”. The liberals “hate” deeper and more vehemently than ANYONE that they target as “haters”. Within their world, they are allowed to “hate” as they do so from the position of moral superiority, they “hate” all the right people, so its fine, get it?
As far as “politics” goes, we all know that politics are a sacred cornerstone within the church of liberalism and we are all very well aware of the fact that the members of the “impartial” media sit in those progressive pews and they have swallowed the Eucharist..
Isn’t it interesting that the media can actually claim to be non biased through the non-existent coverage of this shooting..