Uber Liberales

I have recently begun to wonder why the liberals refuse to debate the issues honestly. When the liberals sanctimoniously claim they want an “open and fair” debate, what that means is that they want you to immediately concede your point due to their intellectual superiority. Why won’t they honestly debate? 1) Their first gambit is to always categorize the opposition as blithering idiots. This was the locus of their attacks on Ronald Reagan who inherited the presidency from the typical liberal “genius”, Jimmy Carter, freeing him up to continue his career as the American who most enthusiastically wanted to destroy America. 2) The second failure rests with the uniquely liberal concept of the personal attack as the fulcrum for their debate. It involves the liberal calling you a “fascist” or a “racist.” They then stand there with their arms crossed, marinating in their noxious liberal juices, vile subversive thoughts percolating behind their sinister eyes. Let’s just call it “argumentative minimalism.” It used to work. The recipient of this rhetorical rabbit punch would have to immediately go off message in order to “prove” they aren’t a “nazi,” because once that stink bomb is detonated, your superior points are lost in the cloud of self imposed liberal moral superiority. The left never forwards an alternative plan, they just simply do not like yours. Why? Two reasons. 1) Over the years, the simplification of the liberal thought process has atrophied their argumentative abilities. 2) The liberals are morally bankrupt. They have also heaved all of their intellectual baggage overboard, they are without scruples or standards and their core constituency is a dystrophic mob of pimply college cowards, middle aged pony tailed failures and senile old “yellow dog” Democrats. With this group as your “base,” there is no need to intellectually refine your arguments. A series of obtuse grunts and snorts will do just fine.